Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler Formulated Using Co-Suspension Delivery Technology in Japanese Patients with COPD: A Subgroup Analysis of the KRONOS Study.

Background: KRONOS, a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study (NCT02497001) conducted in Canada, China, Japan, and the USA, assessed the efficacy and safety of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (BGF MDI), a triple fixed-dose combination therapy, relative to dual therapies in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. Here we present findings from the Japanese subgroup of KRONOS.
Methods: Patients received BGF MDI 320/18/9.6μg, glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF) MDI 18/9.6μg, budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BFF) MDI 320/9.6μg, or budesonide/formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler (BUD/FORM DPI) 400/12μg twice-daily for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) over Weeks 12-24. Symptoms, quality of life, exacerbations, and safety were also assessed.
Results: In total, 416 Japanese patients (21.9% of the global KRONOS population) were randomized and treated with BGF MDI (n=139), GFF MDI (n=138), BFF MDI (n=70), or BUD/FORM DPI (n=69). Nominally significant improvements in the change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 over Weeks 12-24 were observed for BGF MDI vs GFF MDI (least squares mean [LSM] difference 37 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3, 72; P=0.0337) and BFF MDI (67 mL; 95% CI 25, 109; P=0.0020). Treatment with BGF MDI led to a nominally significant reduction in the rate of moderate/severe exacerbations vs GFF MDI (rate ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.19, 0.83; P=0.0142). Compared with dual therapies, numerical improvements were observed with BGF MDI for Transition Dyspnea Index focal score and the change from baseline in Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD total score (P≤0.3899). All treatments were generally well tolerated.
Conclusion: BGF MDI nominally significantly improved lung function and numerically improved symptoms vs GFF MDI and BFF MDI. BGF MDI nominally significantly reduced exacerbations vs GFF MDI in Japanese patients with COPD. Efficacy and safety findings were generally comparable to those in the global KRONOS population.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes

Introduction

The Nippon COPD Epidemiology study, conducted in 2000, estimated that at least 8.6% of Japanese adults (aged ≥40 years) have airflow limitation indicative of COPD.1 In 2015, COPD was the tenth leading cause of death in Japan;2 however, public awareness of the disease is low, with fewer than 20% of adults reporting that they were aware of COPD in a 2012 survey.3 Japan has the highest percentage of adults over the age of 65 in the world,4 and thus the burden of COPD is expected to grow with the aging of the population.

Treatment of COPD is typically initiated with a single bronchodilator (long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LAMA] or long-acting β2-agonist [LABA]), with the addition of a second bronchodilator and/or an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), if necessary, to control symptoms and decrease the risk of exacerbations.5 Triple ICS/LAMA/LABA combinations are currently recommended by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) as a step-up treatment for patients who experience further exacerbations on dual therapy (with step-up from LAMA/LABA recommended particularly for those with blood eosinophil levels ≥100 cells/mm3), or have persistent breathlessness on ICS/LABA therapy.5 Notably, the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) only recommends ICS-containing therapies for patients with COPD who have features of asthma-COPD overlap (ACO),6 which include bronchodilator responsiveness >400 mL and elevated blood eosinophil levels (≥300 cells/mm3).7,8 In line with these recommendations, ICS use tends to be lower in Japanese patients with COPD compared to global patient populations, based on observations from international clinical trials.9,10

A greater benefit of triple therapies vs. dual therapies on lung function, symptoms, and exacerbations has been supported by several recent studies;11–15 however, triple therapy has not been extensively studied in Japanese patients with COPD, who may differ from Western patients in their demographics, clinical characteristics, and pharmacological treatment history.16–18 Budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (BGF MDI) is a triple fixed-dose combination of an ICS, a LAMA, and a LABA formulated using co-suspension delivery technology that is currently in global development for COPD. In a pivotal 24-week, Phase III, multicenter trial (KRONOS; NCT02497001), which included patients from Japan, BGF MDI showed benefits on lung function, symptoms, and exacerbations vs. corresponding LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA therapies, with a similar safety profile.15 Here we report findings from the Japanese subgroup of KRONOS to assess the effects of BGF MDI in Japanese patients with COPD and discuss these in the context of results from the global population.15

Materials and Methods

Study Design

Details of the study design have been previously published.15 Briefly, KRONOS was a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, Phase III randomized trial, conducted in Canada, China, Japan, and the USA. Patients were randomized 2:2:1:1 to receive BGF MDI 320/18/9.6 μg, glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF) MDI 18/9.6 μg, budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BFF) MDI 320/9.6 μg, or open-label budesonide/formoterol dry powder inhaler (BUD/FORM DPI; Symbicort Turbuhaler®) 400/12 μg twice-daily for 24 weeks. For all treatments, each dose was administered as two inhalations. BUD/FORM DPI 400/12 μg was administered as two inhalations of 200/6 μg (metered dose, corresponding to a total daily delivered dose of 320/9 μg). The 18 μg dose of glycopyrrolate and 9.6 μg dose of formoterol fumarate are equivalent to 14.4 µg and 10 µg, respectively, of glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate dihydrate (delivered doses).

The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice, including the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol and informed consent form were approved by appropriate institutional review boards (full details have been published).15 All patients provided written informed consent before screening.

Patients

Inclusion and exclusion criteria for KRONOS have been published.15 Briefly, patients were current or former smokers, 40–80 years of age, with an established clinical history of COPD, which for Japanese patients was defined according to the JRS guidelines19 and confirmed by the investigator. Patients had moderate-to-very severe COPD, defined as a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ≥25% and <80%, according to predicted normal values using reference norms for Japan.19,20 All patients were symptomatic (COPD Assessment Test [CAT] score ≥10) despite receiving two or more inhaled maintenance therapies for at least 6 weeks before screening. There was no requirement for a history of COPD exacerbations in the previous year. Exclusion criteria included, but were not limited to, a current diagnosis of asthma or any other respiratory disorder (other than COPD) which, in the opinion of the investigator, could influence the study results.

Study Endpoints

This manuscript reports findings according to the Japan/China regulatory approach, in which most endpoints were assessed over Weeks 12–24. Data for the global KRONOS study population are presented for comparison. Lung function endpoints were change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 over Weeks 12–24 (primary) and over 24 weeks (secondary). Post-dose spirometry measurements were not conducted in Japan, and therefore the additional secondary lung function endpoints from the Japan/China approach (FEV1 area under the curve from 0 to 4 hrs [AUC0–4] over Weeks 12–24 and peak change from baseline in FEV1 within 4 hrs post-dosing over Weeks 12–24) are not available in the Japanese population.

Secondary symptom and quality of life endpoints included Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score over Weeks 12–24, change from baseline in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score over Weeks 12–24, change from baseline in mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication over 24 weeks, and time to clinically important deterioration (CID; defined as one of the following: a ≥100 mL decrease from baseline in trough FEV1 OR a ≥4 point increase from baseline in SGRQ total score OR a TDI focal score of –1 point or less OR a treatment-emergent moderate or severe COPD exacerbation occurring up to Week 24). Other efficacy endpoints included the rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations over 24 weeks and change from baseline in mean daily Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) total score over Weeks 12–24. CID and moderate/severe exacerbations were defined in KRONOS, as reported by Ferguson et al.15

Safety was assessed via adverse event monitoring, 12-lead electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory testing, and vital sign measurements. Cases of pneumonia and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were adjudicated by an external clinical endpoint committee (CEC) to ensure that appropriate pre-defined and clinically consistent criteria were met for these outcomes. Safety data were reviewed by an external data monitoring committee.

Statistical Analysis

Although the Japanese subgroup analysis was pre-specified, no adjustments for multiplicity were made. Therefore, all P-values and statistical significance reported in this manuscript are nominal. The Japanese modified intent-to-treat (mITT) and safety populations were subsets of the KRONOS mITT and safety populations that included the patients enrolled at sites in Japan. The comparisons of interest for the Japan/China statistical approach were BGF MDI vs. BFF MDI and vs. GFF MDI (both for superiority) and BFF MDI vs. BUD/FORM DPI (for non-inferiority; assessed in the global population only).

The primary endpoint was analyzed using a linear repeated measures model which included the following covariates: baseline trough FEV1, % reversibility to albuterol, baseline eosinophil count, visit, treatment, treatment-by-visit interaction, and ICS use at screening. Analyses of secondary endpoints used similar models with their respective baseline measures as covariates. Time to CID was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model, and the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations was analyzed using a negative binomial model. A post hoc analysis of the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations according to baseline reversibility to albuterol was also performed in the Japanese population. Further details of the statistical analysis have been previously published.15

Results

Study Population

Of the 1902 patients who were randomized in the KRONOS study globally, a total of 416 (21.9%) were randomized and treated in Japan (Figure 1). All were included in the Japanese safety and mITT populations (mean age 69.5 years, 94.2% male, mean post-albuterol FEV1 51.9% of the predicted normal value; Table 1).

Figure 1

Patient disposition.

Abbreviations: BFF, budesonide/formoterol fumarate; BGF, budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; BUD/FORM DPI, budesonide/formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler; GFF, glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; MDI, metered dose inhaler; mITT, modified intent-to-treat.

Table 1

Demographic and Baseline Disease Characteristics (Japanese Safety Population)

	BGF MDI 320/18/9.6 µg N=139	GFF MDI 18/9.6 µg N=138	BFF MDI 320/9.6 µg N=70	BUD/FORM DPI 400/12 µg N=69
Mean age, years (SD)	69.4 (7.1)	69.0 (6.1)	69.7 (6.1)	70.1 (6.8)
Male, n (%)	130 (93.5)	126 (91.3)	68 (97.1)	68 (98.6)
Mean body mass index, kg/m2 (SD)	22.7 (3.5)	22.5 (3.3)	23.1 (3.6)	23.0 (2.9)
Current smoker, n (%)	40 (28.8)	41 (29.7)	19 (27.1)	21 (30.4)
Median number of pack-years smokeda (range)	51.0 (10.0–186.1)	52.0 (10.0–135.0)	50.0 (11.5–192.0)	55.0 (12.5–180.0)
COPD severity, n (%)
Moderate	72 (51.8)	74 (53.6)	38 (54.3)	37 (53.6)
Severe	54 (38.8)	60 (43.5)	29 (41.4)	28 (40.6)
Very severe	13 (9.4)	4 (2.9)	3 (4.3)	4 (5.8)
Mean COPD duration, years (SD)	5.4 (3.9)	5.2 (4.4)	5.6 (5.0)	5.2 (3.7)
Moderate or severe COPD exacerbations in the past 12 months, n (%)
0	103 (74.1)	114 (82.6)	58 (82.9)	58 (84.1)
1	25 (18.0)	16 (11.6)	10 (14.3)	6 (8.7)
≥2	11 (7.9)	8 (5.8)	2 (2.9)	5 (7.2)
Moderate/severe exacerbation rate
Mean (SD)	0.4 (0.8)	0.2 (0.6)	0.2 (0.5)	0.2 (0.6)
Median (range)	0 (0–5)	0 (0–4)	0 (0–3)	0 (0–2)
Eosinophils
Median cells/mm3 (range)	150.0 (30–670)	162.5 (25–2465)	140.0 (30–920)	165.0 (40–1040)
≥150 cells/mm3, n (%)	70 (50.4)	75 (54.3)	34 (48.6)	39 (56.5)
≥300 cells/mm3, n (%)	18 (13.0)	22 (15.9)	8 (11.4)	7 (10.1)
Mean post-albuterol FEV1, % predicted (SD)	51.1 (14.4)	52.2 (13.1)	52.2 (14.8)	52.7 (14.5)
Reversibility to albuterol
Mean post-albuterol FEV1 – pre-albuterol FEV1, mL (SD)	179.9 (117.0)	174.1 (120.3)	170.5 (147.9)	162.1 (119.4)
Reversibleb, n (%)	55 (39.6)	51 (37.0)	24 (34.3)	26 (37.7)
Use of ICS at screening, n (%)	42 (30.2)	46 (33.3)	21 (30.0)	22 (31.9)
BDI focal score
N	133	126	64	64
Mean (SD)	7.5 (1.8)	7.5 (1.8)	7.7 (2.1)	7.6 (1.8)
SGRQ total score
N	133	126	65	64
Mean (SD)	35.6 (14.4)	37.0 (13.8)	32.7 (13.7)	34.2 (14.7)
Mean CAT total score (SD)	15.4 (4.9)	15.4 (4.6)	14.3 (4.0)	13.9 (3.9)
Rescue medication usec
N	139	138	70	68
Mean (SD)	0.8 (1.3)	0.7 (1.7)	0.5 (1.2)	0.5 (1.4)
Median (range), puffs/day	0.0 (0.0–6.6)	0.0 (0.0–12.1)	0.0 (0.0–6.9)	0.0 (0.0–8.0)

Notes: aNumber of pack-years smoked = (number of cigarettes each day/20) x number of years smoked. bReversible is defined as improvement in FEV1 post-albuterol administration compared with pre-albuterol of ≥12% and ≥200 mL. cAssessed during the last seven days of the screening period.

Abbreviations: BDI, Baseline Dyspnea Index; BFF, budesonide/formoterol fumarate; BGF, budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; BUD/FORM DPI, budesonide/formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler; CAT, COPD Assessment Test; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; GFF, glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; MDI, metered dose inhaler; SD, standard deviation; SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.

The most common COPD medication in the Japanese population at study entry was a LAMA plus a LABA (66.6%) followed by triple therapy consisting of an ICS, a LAMA, and a LABA (19.7%); in total, 31.5% of patients were receiving an ICS-containing therapy at screening. Approximately half of Japanese patients had a blood eosinophil count ≥150 cells/mm3 (52.4%) and a minority had counts ≥300 cells/mm3 (13.2%). Reversibility (defined as improvement in FEV1 of ≥12% and ≥200 mL following administration of albuterol) was observed in 37.5% of Japanese patients, and 3.6% of patients had reversibility ≥400 mL. Overall, most Japanese patients had no history of COPD exacerbations in the year prior to study entry (80.0%). The proportion of patients in the Japanese population who had experienced ≥1 exacerbation in the past 12 months was highest in the BGF MDI group (25.9%) and comparable across the dual therapy groups (range: 15.9–17.4%; Table 1).

Lung Function

For the primary endpoint of change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 over Weeks 12–24, nominally significant improvements for BGF MDI vs. GFF MDI (least squares mean [LSM] difference 37 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3, 72 mL; P=0.0337) and vs. BFF MDI (LSM difference 67 mL, 95% CI 25, 109 mL; P=0.0020; Table 2, Figure 2) were observed in Japanese patients. Similarly, in the global population, BGF MDI significantly improved morning pre-dose trough FEV1 over Weeks 12–24 compared to GFF MDI (LSM difference 20 mL, 95% CI 1, 39 mL; P=0.0424) and BFF MDI (LSM difference 77 mL, 95% CI 53, 100 mL; P<0.0001; Table 2). BFF MDI was non-inferior to BUD/FORM DPI for the change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 over Weeks 12–24 in the global per-protocol (LSM difference –11 mL, 95% CI –39, 17 mL) and mITT populations (LSM difference –15 mL, 95% CI –42, 12 mL), using a non-inferiority margin of –50 mL for the lower bound of the 95% CI. Similar treatment differences for BGF MDI vs. GFF MDI and BFF MDI were observed in both the Japanese and global populations for the secondary endpoint of change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 over 24 weeks (Table 2, Figure 2).

Table 2

Primary and Secondary Lung Function Endpoints (Efficacy Estimand; mITT Population)

	BGF MDI 320/18/9.6 µg	GFF MDI 18/9.6 µg	BFF MDI 320/9.6 µg	BUD/FORM DPI 400/12 µg
Primary Endpoint
Change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 (Weeks 12–24), mL
Japan
n LSM (SE)	134123 (12.6)	12685 (12.8)	6556 (17.7)	6587 (17.6)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
LSM (95% CI) P-value	NA	37 (3, 72)0.0337	67 (25, 109)0.0020	35 (–7, 77)0.0996
Global
n LSM (SE)	592138 (7.0)	559118 (7.1)	27861 (9.9)	28876 (9.8)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
LSM (95% CI) P-value	NA	20 (1, 39)0.0424	77 (53, 100)<0.0001	62 (38, 85)<0.0001
Secondary Endpoint
Change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 (over 24 weeks), mL
Japan
n LSM (SE)	137130 (11.7)	13496 (11.9)	6868 (16.4)	6897 (16.4)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
LSM (95% CI) P-value	NA	34 (2, 66)0.0368	62 (23, 101)0.0020	33 (–6, 72)0.1014
Globala
n LSM (SE)	622147 (6.5)	601125 (6.6)	30073 (9.2)	30188 (9.1)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
LSM (95% CI) P-value	NA	22 (4, 39)0.0139	74 (52, 95)<0.0001	59 (38, 80)<0.0001

Notes: aData from Ferguson et al.15

Abbreviations: BFF, budesonide/formoterol fumarate; BGF, budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; BUD/FORM DPI, budesonide/formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler; CI, confidence interval; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; GFF, glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; LSM, least squares mean; MDI, metered dose inhaler; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; NA, not applicable; SE, standard error.

Figure 2

Change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 over 24 weeks (efficacy estimand; Japanese mITT population).

Note: Error bars represent standard error.

Abbreviations: BFF, budesonide/formoterol fumarate; BGF, budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; BUD/FORM DPI, budesonide/formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; GFF, glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; LSM, least squares mean; MDI, metered dose inhaler; mITT, modified intent-to-treat.

While post-dose lung function assessments were not performed in the Japanese population, the secondary endpoints of FEV1 AUC0–4, and peak change from baseline in FEV1 within 4 hrs post-dosing over Weeks 12–24 were significantly larger for BGF MDI vs. BFF MDI (both P<0.0001) but not vs. GFF MDI in the global population ). For FEV1 AUC0–4, BFF MDI was non-inferior to BUD/FORM DPI using a margin of –75 mL in the global per-protocol (LSM difference –13 mL, 95% CI –50, 24 mL), and mITT (LSM difference –16 mL, 95% CI –52, 20 mL) populations.

Symptoms and Quality of Life Endpoints

In the PDF version of the article, the units are broken over the line from the figures. Please ensure that these are kept together.Overall, changes from baseline in symptoms and quality of life endpoints were smaller in the Japanese vs. the global population (Table 3). This reflected less severe symptom burden at baseline in Japanese patients, as evidenced by higher Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) scores, lower SGRQ and CAT total scores, and lower use of rescue medication compared to the overall population.15 In the Japanese population, treatment with BGF MDI numerically improved TDI focal scores over Weeks 12–24 vs. GFF MDI and BFF MDI (LSM differences 0.17 [95% CI –0.17, 0.50] and 0.22 [95% CI –0.18, 0.63], respectively; P≤0.3279; Table 3). Slightly smaller treatment differences in TDI focal score favoring BGF MDI vs. GFF MDI and BFF MDI were also seen in the global population (Table 3).

Table 3

Symptom and Quality of Life Endpoints (Efficacy Estimand; mITT Population)

	BGF MDI 320/18/9.6 µg	GFF MDI 18/9.6 µg	BFF MDI 320/9.6 µg	BUD/FORM DPI 400/12 µg
TDI focal score over Weeks 12–24
Japan
n LSM (SE)	1330.42 (0.12)	1260.25 (0.12)	640.19 (0.17)	640.07 (0.17)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
LSM (95% CI) P-value	NA	0.17 (–0.17, 0.50)0.3279	0.22 (–0.18, 0.63)0.2804	0.34 (–0.06, 0.75)0.0952
Global
n LSM (SE)	5851.21 (0.10)	5441.13 (0.10)	2741.06 (0.14)	2800.72 (0.14)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
LSM (95% CI) P-value	NA	0.07 (–0.20, 0.35)0.5928	0.15 (–0.18, 0.48)0.3729	0.49 (0.16, 0.82)0.0037
Change from baseline in SGRQ total score over Weeks 12–24
Japan
n LSM (SE)	133–4.1 (0.75)	126–2.6 (0.77)	65–4.3 (1.06)	64–3.4 (1.06)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
LSM (95% CI) P-value	NA	–1.52 (–3.60, 0.55)0.1495	0.20 (–2.33, 2.73)0.8766	–0.73 (–3.26, 1.81)0.5724
Global
n LSM (SE)	592–7.9 (0.50)	553–6.8 (0.51)	277–7.4 (0.67)	284–6.5 (0.67)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
LSM (95% CI) P-value	NA	–1.10 (–2.29, 0.10)0.0717	–0.52 (–1.99, 0.95)0.4893	–1.42 (–2.88, 0.04)0.0570
Change from baseline in E-RS total score over Weeks 12–24
Japan
n LSM (SE)	134–0.9 (0.35)	1270.0 (0.35)	65–0.4 (0.49)	66–0.3 (0.49)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
LSM (95% CI) P-value	NA	–0.89 (–1.86, 0.07)0.0701	–0.52 (–1.70, 0.66)0.3899	–0.60 (–1.78, 0.58)0.3204
Global
n LSM (SE)	596–1.1 (0.16)	560–0.8 (0.16)	278–1.0 (0.23)	292–0.9 (0.22)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
LSM (95% CI) P-value	NA	–0.29 (–0.72, 0.15)0.1965	–0.05 (–0.59, 0.48)0.8445	–0.16 (–0.69, 0.37)0.5538
Change from baseline in average daily rescue medication use over 24 weeks, puffs/day
Japan
n LSM (SE)	139–0.2 (0.07)	1380.0 (0.07)	70–0.1 (0.10)	68–0.3 (0.10)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
LSM (95% CI) P-value	NA	–0.13 (–0.32, 0.06)0.1831	–0.09 (–0.33, 0.14)0.4439	0.12 (–0.12, 0.35)0.3358
Global
n LSM (SE)	638–0.5 (0.06)	621–0.4 (0.06)	313–0.4 (0.08)	313–0.7 (0.08)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
LSM (95% CI) P-value	NA	–0.12 (–0.28, 0.04)0.1543	–0.14 (–0.34, 0.06)0.1793	0.16 (–0.04, 0.36)0.1198

Abbreviations: BFF, budesonide/formoterol fumarate; BGF, budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; BUD/FORM DPI, budesonide/formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler; CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; E-RS, Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD Total score; GFF, glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; LSM, least squares mean; MDI, metered dose inhaler; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; NA, not applicable; SE, standard error; SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; TDI, Transition Dyspnea Index.

BGF MDI numerically improved SGRQ total score over Weeks 12–24 vs. GFF MDI in both the Japanese (LSM difference –1.52, 95% CI –3.60, 0.55; P=0.1495) and global (LSM difference –1.10, 95% CI –2.29, 0.10; P=0.0717) populations (Table 3). A small numerical improvement for BGF MDI vs. BFF MDI in SGRQ total score was observed in the global population (LSM difference –0.52, 95% CI –1.99, 0.95; P=0.4893) but not in the Japanese population (LSM difference 0.20, 95% CI –2.33, 2.73; P=0.8766; Table 3).

BGF MDI numerically decreased E-RS total scores in Japanese patients (indicating an improvement in symptoms) vs. GFF MDI (LSM difference –0.89, 95% CI –1.86, 0.07; P=0.0701) and vs. BFF MDI (LSM difference –0.52, 95% CI –1.70, 0.66; P=0.3899). There were also small numerical differences in E-RS scores in favor of BGF MDI vs. both dual comparators in the global population (Table 3).

Changes from baseline in daily rescue medication use over 24 weeks were small and similar across treatment groups in both the Japanese (range: 0.0 to –0.3 puffs/day) and global (range: –0.4 to –0.7 puffs/day) populations (P≤0.4439; Table 3).

CID and COPD Exacerbations

The percentage of Japanese patients experiencing a CID was comparable across the BGF MDI, GFF MDI, and BFF MDI groups (range: 66–69%), and slightly higher in the BUD/FORM DPI group (74%; Table 4). Hazard ratios for time to CID were 0.93, 0.89, and 0.81 for BGF MDI vs. GFF MDI, BFF MDI, and BUD/FORM DPI, respectively (Table 4).

Table 4

CIDa and COPD Exacerbations (Efficacy Estimand; Japanese mITT Population)

	BGF MDI 320/18/9.6 µg N=139	GFF MDI 18/9.6 µg N=138	BFF MDI 320/9.6 µg N=70	BUD/FORM DPI 400/12 µg N=69
Time to CIDa
Patients with CID, n (%)	91 (65.5)	92 (66.7)	48 (68.6)	51 (73.9)
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value	NA	0.93 (0.70, 1.25)0.6461	0.89 (0.63, 1.27)0.5348	0.81 (0.57, 1.14)0.2270
Rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations, model-estimated rate per year
Patients with exacerbations, n (%)Rate	20 (14.4)0.32	28 (20.3)0.82	7 (10.0)0.23	9 (13.0)0.28
Treatment difference for BGF MDI vs. comparators
Rate ratio (95% CI) P-value	NA	0.40 (0.19, 0.83)0.0142	1.39 (0.47, 4.13)0.5556	1.16 (0.43, 3.16)0.7644

Notes: aCID was defined as a ≥100 mL decrease from baseline in trough FEV1; a ≥4 point increase from baseline in SGRQ total score; a TDI focal score of –1 point or less; or a treatment-emergent moderate or severe COPD exacerbation occurring up to Week 24.

Abbreviations: BFF, budesonide/formoterol fumarate; BGF, budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; BUD/FORM DPI, budesonide/formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler; CI, confidence interval; CID, clinically important deterioration; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; GFF, glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; MDI, metered dose inhaler; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; NA, not applicable; SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; TDI, Transition Dyspnea Index.

Annualized rates of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations in Japanese patients over 24 weeks were 0.32, 0.82, 0.23, and 0.28 for BGF MDI, GFF MDI, BFF MDI, and BUD/FORM DPI, respectively (Table 4). BGF MDI nominally significantly reduced the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations vs. GFF MDI (rate ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.19, 0.83; P=0.0142) but not vs. BFF MDI (1.39, 95% CI 0.47, 4.13; P=0.5556). However, the number of subjects with exacerbations in the BFF MDI and BUD/FORM DPI groups was small (Table 4), and therefore no definitive conclusions can be derived from these comparisons. In a post hoc analysis of COPD exacerbations by reversibility at baseline, the lower rate of moderate or severe exacerbations for BGF MDI compared to GFF MDI was observed in both reversible (model-estimated rate 0.25 vs. 0.96 per year, respectively) and non-reversible (0.32 vs. 0.71, respectively) patients in the Japanese population.

Safety

The percentage of Japanese patients who experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) ranged from 59.4% in the BUD/FORM DPI group to 72.9% in the BFF MDI group (Table 5). Overall, the most commonly observed TEAEs in Japanese patients were nasopharyngitis (19.7%) and bronchitis (5.3%). The incidence of serious TEAEs was comparable across treatment groups (range: 7.9–10.1%; Table 5); the most frequent serious TEAEs in the Japanese population overall were COPD (2.9%) and pneumonia (1.0%). Eight patients in the Japan subgroup (1.9%) had confirmed pneumonia events, seven of which occurred in the BGF MDI group (5.0%); the incidence of confirmed pneumonia ranged from 0% to 0.7% across the other three treatment groups. Of the seven confirmed cases of pneumonia in the BGF MDI, only one was considered by the investigator to be treatment-related. A total of three Japanese patients (0.7%) had an event confirmed as MACE: two cases of non-fatal myocardial infarction (both in the BUD/FORM DPI group), and one cardiovascular death in the GFF MDI group. Neither of the two deaths in the Japan subgroup that resulted from TEAEs reported during the study were considered by the investigator to be related to study treatment (one each in the GFF MDI and BFF MDI groups resulting from cardio-respiratory arrest and squamous cell carcinoma, respectively). No clinically meaningful trends in clinical laboratory values, vital signs, or electrocardiogram parameters were observed in any of the treatment groups.

Table 5

Summary of Adverse Events (Japanese Safety Population)

	BGF MDI 320/18/9.6 µg N=139	GFF MDI 18/9.6 µg N=138	BFF MDI 320/9.6 µg N=70	BUD/FORM DPI 400/12 µg N=69
TEAEs, n (%)
Patients with ≥1 TEAE	93 (66.9)	92 (66.7)	51 (72.9)	41 (59.4)
Patients with TEAEs relateda to study treatment	29 (20.9)	11 (8.0)	12 (17.1)	4 (5.8)
Patients with serious TEAEs	11 (7.9)	14 (10.1)	7 (10.0)	6 (8.7)
Patients with serious TEAEs relateda to study treatment	1 (0.7)	4 (2.9)	0	0
Patients with TEAEs that led to early discontinuation	6 (4.3)	6 (4.3)	2 (2.9)	2 (2.9)
Patients with confirmedb MACE	0	1 (0.7)	0	2 (2.9)
Patients with confirmedb,c pneumonia	7 (5.0)	1 (0.7)	0	0
Deaths (all causes)	0	1 (0.7)	1 (1.4)	0
TEAEs occurring in ≥3% of patients in any treatment arm, preferred term, n (%)
Nasopharyngitis	29 (20.9)	23 (16.7)	14 (20.0)	16 (23.2)
Bronchitis	6 (4.3)	6 (4.3)	7 (10.0)	3 (4.3)
Dysphonia	9 (6.5)	1 (0.7)	8 (11.4)	3 (4.3)
Muscle spasms	12 (8.6)	2 (1.4)	5 (7.1)	2 (2.9)
Upper respiratory tract infection	7 (5.0)	5 (3.6)	1 (1.4)	1 (1.4)
Upper respiratory tract inflammation	4 (2.9)	6 (4.3)	3 (4.3)	0
COPDd	4 (2.9)	5 (3.6)	2 (2.9)	1 (1.4)
Influenza	1 (0.7)	4 (2.9)	1 (1.4)	4 (5.8)
Eczema	1 (0.7)	2 (1.4)	2 (2.9)	3 (4.3)
Pneumoniac,e	6 (4.3)	1 (0.7)	1 (1.4)	0

Notes: aPossibly, probably, or definitely related in the opinion of the investigator. bConfirmed by clinical endpoint committee. cOne confirmed case of pneumonia in the BGF MDI group was reported under the preferred term of interstitial lung disease, and therefore was not categorized as a TEAE of pneumonia. dWorsening of COPD. eSpontaneously reported as adverse events; not confirmed by clinical endpoint committee.

Abbreviations: BFF, budesonide/formoterol fumarate; BGF, budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; BUD/FORM DPI, budesonide/formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GFF, glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MDI, metered dose inhaler; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.

Discussion

The KRONOS study provided support for the use of triple therapy in a global population of symptomatic patients with COPD (CAT score ≥10 despite treatment with two or more inhaled maintenance therapies), the majority of whom had not experienced an exacerbation in the past year.15 Here, we present findings from a pre-specified analysis of the Japan subgroup of KRONOS, demonstrating that triple therapy improved lung function compared to both dual therapies in Japanese patients with COPD and also reduced exacerbations compared to LAMA/LABA therapy.

Overall, efficacy and safety findings were comparable between the Japanese and global populations, with the degree of variation expected given the smaller sample size of the Japan subgroup, especially in the BFF MDI and BUD/FORM DPI groups due to the 2:2:1:1 randomization ratio. While both the global and Japanese populations were similar in terms of airflow limitation, exacerbation history, and eosinophil count, the Japanese population was slightly older on average and had slightly higher mean BDI focal scores and lower SGRQ and CAT total scores at baseline, indicating a slightly lower symptom burden overall.15 In addition, use of ICS at baseline was lower in Japanese patients relative to the global population. These demographic differences are generally consistent with the results of other subgroup analyses of Japanese patients with COPD who participated in similar global Phase III clinical studies of LAMA/LABA therapies.10,21

For morning pre-dose trough FEV1, treatment comparisons showed larger improvements with BGF MDI compared to GFF MDI and BFF MDI, which were generally consistent between the Japan and global populations. BGF MDI also showed numerical benefits on symptoms endpoints vs. GFF MDI and BFF MDI in Japanese patients, with treatment differences similar to the global population. The variability in the magnitude of improvement from baseline in the Japanese population compared to the global population was consistent with the smaller sample size and the fact that Japanese patients reported less severe symptoms and higher quality of life at baseline compared to the overall patient population.15

All three ICS-containing treatments showed a marked effect on exacerbation rates vs. LAMA/LABA therapy in Japanese patients. This is notable as the current JRS guidelines only recommend ICS treatment for patients with evidence of ACO.6 However, patients with a current diagnosis of asthma were not permitted to enroll in KRONOS. Additionally, only a small proportion of the Japanese subpopulation showed characteristic features of ACO,7,8 with only 3.6% having reversibility to albuterol ≥400 mL, and 13.2% having a blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/mm3 at baseline. Moreover, the exacerbation findings were consistent across both reversible and non-reversible patients, suggesting that the response to ICS treatment in Japanese patients was not due to an asthma component. While no meaningful differences in exacerbation rates were observed between the triple and dual ICS-containing therapies in the Japan subgroup (in contrast to the numerical improvement seen with BGF MDI vs. BFF MDI in the global population), this may be a result of baseline differences in prior exacerbation history between the BGF MDI group and both ICS/LABA groups as well as the smaller sample size of the Japan population. Indeed, the small sample size and the relatively low number of exacerbation events in Japanese patients resulted in an estimate with high variability, and thus these findings should be interpreted with caution. The slightly lower overall rate of exacerbations in Japanese patients compared to the global population is consistent with other Japanese and Asian subgroup analyses in COPD,9,10,22 as well as the fact that 80% of the Japanese population had no history of exacerbation in the previous year. The reduction in exacerbations observed with ICS-containing therapies compared to GFF MDI suggests that many symptomatic patients in Japan could benefit from the addition of an ICS to their treatment regimen (regardless of exacerbation history), as only 31.5% were receiving ICS therapy at study entry (compared to 71.8% of the global population).

Overall, all treatments were generally well tolerated in Japanese patients, and the safety profile of BGF MDI was comparable to the results from the global population. These findings are in agreement with a previous Phase I study of BGF MDI, which found that exposure and tolerability were comparable between Western and Japanese healthy subjects.23 Although some numerical differences were observed in the adverse event profile between the Japanese and global KRONOS populations,15 the differences were generally small in magnitude and to be expected, based on the smaller sample size of the Japanese subgroup. With regard to pneumonia, an important safety outcome with ICS-containing therapies in COPD, the highest incidence of confirmed pneumonia was observed in the BGF MDI group (n=7; 5.0%), and the incidence was similar between the ICS/LABA and LAMA/LABA groups (n=0–1; 0–0.7%). This was most likely a chance finding based on several factors. Firstly, there was no clear trend for a higher incidence of pneumonia in the budesonide-containing treatment groups (BGF MDI, 5.0%; BFF MDI 0%; BUD/FORM DPI, 0%) compared to GFF MDI (0.7%). Secondly, there was an imbalance in the baseline exacerbation history across treatment groups that may have contributed to the imbalance in the incidence of pneumonia. Specifically, the percentage of patients who had experienced an exacerbation in the previous year was highest in the BGF MDI group (25.9%) vs. all three dual therapy groups (range: 15.9–17.4%), and a previous exacerbation is a risk factor for pneumonia in patients with COPD.24 Accordingly, five of the seven patients with confirmed pneumonia in the BGF MDI group had a history of exacerbation in the past 12 months, while the patient in the GFF MDI group who developed pneumonia did not have a prior history of exacerbation. Furthermore, the incidence of pneumonia in the global population was comparable for all treatments (range: 1.3–1.9%),15 and overall rates of pneumonia across groups were comparable between the Japanese (1.9%) and global (1.7%) populations. Finally, in an extension of the current study, which evaluated Japanese patients enrolled in KRONOS for an additional 28 weeks, the incidence of pneumonia during Weeks 24–52 of treatment was similar across the BGF MDI (4.3%) and dual therapy treatment groups (range: 2.9–5.7%).25 Across the 52-week study, five of the 13 patients in the BGF MDI group with confirmed pneumonia (and none of the 11 patients in the other three treatment groups) had experienced an exacerbation in the previous year.

A limitation of the study is the small sample size in the Japanese subgroup, requiring the conclusions to be interpreted with caution; however, this factor is somewhat mitigated by the generally similar results between the global and Japanese populations.

Conclusions

BGF MDI nominally significantly improved lung function and numerically improved symptoms compared with LAMA/LABA (GFF MDI) and ICS/LABA (BFF MDI) combination therapies. BGF MDI also nominally significantly reduced the rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations vs. GFF MDI in Japanese patients with COPD despite the fact that these patients did not meet criteria for asthma-COPD overlap. Efficacy and safety findings were generally comparable to the global KRONOS study population. These results suggest that triple therapy with BGF MDI is efficacious and well tolerated in Japanese patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD, and may be a useful treatment option for those who experience continued symptoms on dual therapy, regardless of exacerbation history and bronchodilator reversibility.