Literature DB >> 31920241

Erratum: Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation.

.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article on p. 348 in vol. 35, PMID: 31543583.]. Copyright:
© 2019 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31920241      PMCID: PMC6939548          DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.189878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0970-9185


In the article titled “Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation”, published on pages 348-352, Issue 3, Volume 35 of Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology,[1] the name of the second author is written incorrectly as “Dalal G Priti” instead of “Priti G Dalal”. The “How to cite this article” section should read correctly as “Bruceta MA, Dalal PG, McAllister P, Prozesky J, Vaida SJ, Budde AO. Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2019;35:348-52”
  1 in total

1.  Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Melanio A Bruceta; Dalal G Priti; Paul McAllister; Jansie Prozesky; Sonia J Vaida; Arne O Budde
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.