Literature DB >> 31920206

Is precipitation a good metric for model performance?

Francisco J Tapiador1, Rémy Roca2, Anthony Del Genio3, Boris Dewitte2,4,5, Walt Petersen6, Fuqing Zhang7.   

Abstract

Precipitation has often been used to gauge the performances of numerical weather and climate models, sometimes together with other variables such as temperature, humidity, geopotential, and clouds. Precipitation, however, is singular in that it can present a high spatial variability and probably the sharpest gradients amongst all meteorological fields. Moreover, its quantitative measurement is plagued with difficulties and there are even notable differences among different reference datasets. Several additional issues have yield to sometimes question its usefulness in model validation. This essay discusses the use of precipitation for model verification and validation, and the crucial role of highly precise and reliable satellite estimates, such as those from the core observatory of NASA's Global Precipitation Mission (GPM).

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31920206      PMCID: PMC6951255          DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0218.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc        ISSN: 0003-0007            Impact factor:   8.766


  8 in total

1.  Robust twenty-first-century projections of El Niño and related precipitation variability.

Authors:  Scott Power; François Delage; Christine Chung; Greg Kociuba; Kevin Keay
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Increases in tropical rainfall driven by changes in frequency of organized deep convection.

Authors:  Jackson Tan; Christian Jakob; William B Rossow; George Tselioudis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  THE GLOBAL PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT (GPM) MISSION FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY.

Authors:  Gail Skofronick-Jackson; Walter A Petersen; Wesley Berg; Chris Kidd; Erich F Stocker; Dalia B Kirschbaum; Ramesh Kakar; Scott A Braun; George J Huffman; Toshio Iguchi; Pierre E Kirstetter; Christian Kummerow; Robert Meneghini; Riko Oki; William S Olson; Yukari N Takayabu; Kinji Furukawa; Thomas Wilheit
Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 8.766

4.  So, how much of the Earth's surface is covered by rain gauges?

Authors:  Chris Kidd; Andreas Becker; George J Huffman; Catherine L Muller; Paul Joe; Gail Skofronick-Jackson; Dalia B Kirschbaum
Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 8.766

5.  Practice and philosophy of climate model tuning across six U.S. modeling centers.

Authors:  Gavin A Schmidt; David Bader; Leo J Donner; Gregory S Elsaesser; Jean-Christophe Golaz; Cecile Hannay; Andrea Molod; Rich Neale; Suranjana Saha
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.135

6.  Observational constraints on mixed-phase clouds imply higher climate sensitivity.

Authors:  Ivy Tan; Trude Storelvmo; Mark D Zelinka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Diurnal cloud cycle biases in climate models.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Amilcare Porporato
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Humans have already increased the risk of major disruptions to Pacific rainfall.

Authors:  Scott B Power; François P D Delage; Christine T Y Chung; Hua Ye; Bradley F Murphy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Advancing Precipitation Estimation, Prediction, and Impact Studies.

Authors:  Efi Foufoula-Georgiou; Clement Guilloteau; Phu Nguyen; Amir Aghakouchak; Kuo-Lin Hsu; Antonio Busalacchi; F Joseph Turk; Christa Peters-Lidard; Taikan Oki; Qingyun Duan; Witold Krajewski; Remko Uijlenhoet; Ana Barros; Pierre Kirstetter; William Logan; Terri Hogue; Hoshin Gupta; Vincenzo Levizzani
Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 8.766

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.