Katja Schlichtig1, Pauline Dürr, Frank Dörje, Martin F Fromm. 1. Chair of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology, Institute for Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen; Pharmacy, University Hospital Erlangen; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg (EMN), Erlangen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many oral anti-cancer drugs have come onto the market in the past 20 years. For example, kinase inhibitors, such as the BCR-ABL and BRAF inhibitors, have markedly improved the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and melanoma. In this review, we discuss the special challenges posed by poor adherence, drug-drug interactions with other substances, and side effects, among other problems, and the ways in which these challenges can be met. METHODS: A selective search was carried out in PubMed for original and review articles on the safety of new oral anti-cancer drugs. Guidelines and current Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPC) were also considered in the analysis. RESULTS: Review articles have pointed out numerous safety concerns with oral anti-cancer drugs. One of these is adherence, on which highly variable figures are available (with mean non-adherence rates ranging from 0 to 54%). The absorption of approximately half of these drugs is influenced by the patient's diet, and that of approximately 20% by gastric pH (Caution: proton-pump inhibitors may influence bioavailability). 70% of the active substances are metabolized primarily by CYP3A4, which means that their pharmacokinetics can be altered by grapefruit juice and CYP3A4 modulators. The prevention, detection, and treatment of side effects (which can be gastrointestinal, cutaneous, cardiovascular, or other) is a highly important matter. CONCLUSION: The increasing use of oral anti-cancer drugs confronts patients and treatment teams with special challenges. To optimize treatment outcomes, a multidisciplinary approach should be taken, involving physicians, pharmacists, and nurses. To improve medication safety, medication and side-effect management should be performed, and adherence should be regularly checked and systematically encouraged.
BACKGROUND: Many oral anti-cancer drugs have come onto the market in the past 20 years. For example, kinase inhibitors, such as the BCR-ABL and BRAF inhibitors, have markedly improved the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and melanoma. In this review, we discuss the special challenges posed by poor adherence, drug-drug interactions with other substances, and side effects, among other problems, and the ways in which these challenges can be met. METHODS: A selective search was carried out in PubMed for original and review articles on the safety of new oral anti-cancer drugs. Guidelines and current Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPC) were also considered in the analysis. RESULTS: Review articles have pointed out numerous safety concerns with oral anti-cancer drugs. One of these is adherence, on which highly variable figures are available (with mean non-adherence rates ranging from 0 to 54%). The absorption of approximately half of these drugs is influenced by the patient's diet, and that of approximately 20% by gastric pH (Caution: proton-pump inhibitors may influence bioavailability). 70% of the active substances are metabolized primarily by CYP3A4, which means that their pharmacokinetics can be altered by grapefruit juice and CYP3A4 modulators. The prevention, detection, and treatment of side effects (which can be gastrointestinal, cutaneous, cardiovascular, or other) is a highly important matter. CONCLUSION: The increasing use of oral anti-cancer drugs confronts patients and treatment teams with special challenges. To optimize treatment outcomes, a multidisciplinary approach should be taken, involving physicians, pharmacists, and nurses. To improve medication safety, medication and side-effect management should be performed, and adherence should be regularly checked and systematically encouraged.
Authors: Joseph A Greer; Nicole Amoyal; Lauren Nisotel; Joel N Fishbein; James MacDonald; Jamie Stagl; Inga Lennes; Jennifer S Temel; Steven A Safren; William F Pirl Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-02-26
Authors: Ronald J Maggiore; William Dale; Cary P Gross; Tao Feng; William P Tew; Supriya G Mohile; Cynthia Owusu; Heidi D Klepin; Stuart M Lichtman; Ajeet Gajra; Rupal Ramani; Vani Katheria; Laura Zavala; Arti Hurria Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lucien Noens; Marie-Anne van Lierde; Robrecht De Bock; Gregor Verhoef; Pierre Zachée; Zwi Berneman; Philippe Martiat; Philippe Mineur; Koen Van Eygen; Karen MacDonald; Sabina De Geest; Tara Albrecht; Ivo Abraham Journal: Blood Date: 2009-04-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Stephen G O'Brien; François Guilhot; Richard A Larson; Insa Gathmann; Michele Baccarani; Francisco Cervantes; Jan J Cornelissen; Thomas Fischer; Andreas Hochhaus; Timothy Hughes; Klaus Lechner; Johan L Nielsen; Philippe Rousselot; Josy Reiffers; Giuseppe Saglio; John Shepherd; Bengt Simonsson; Alois Gratwohl; John M Goldman; Hagop Kantarjian; Kerry Taylor; Gregor Verhoef; Ann E Bolton; Renaud Capdeville; Brian J Druker Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen J H Dobbin; Alan C Cameron; Mark C Petrie; Robert J Jones; Rhian M Touyz; Ninian N Lang Journal: Heart Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Brian I Rini; Darrel P Cohen; Dongrui R Lu; Isan Chen; Subramanian Hariharan; Martin E Gore; Robert A Figlin; Michael S Baum; Robert J Motzer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Madeleine Dennis; Aasha Haines; Marie Johnson; Jonathan Soggee; Selina Tong; Richard Parsons; Bruce Sunderland; Petra Czarniak Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2022-07-22 Impact factor: 1.771
Authors: Katja Schlichtig; Lisa Cuba; Pauline Dürr; Laura Bellut; Norbert Meidenbauer; Frank Kunath; Peter J Goebell; Andreas Mackensen; Frank Dörje; Martin F Fromm; Bernd Wullich Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 4.964