Literature DB >> 31919681

Efficacy and safety of ND:YAG 1064 nm lasers for photoepilation: a systematic review.

Débora Aparecida Oliveira Modena1,2,3,4, Ana Carolina Godoy Miranda5,6,7, Clovis Grecco5,6, Richard Eloin Liebano5,8, Raquel Cristina Tancsik Cordeiro9, Renata Michelini Guidi5,6,10.   

Abstract

Using light sources in phototherapy has presented promising results regarding several types of facial and body skin affections for centuries. The neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (ND:YAG) 1064 nm laser has become a standard treatment in dermatology for dermatological disturbances related to the pilous follicle and the structures surrounding it. Despite the reports of its clinical benefits, few scientific studies show its actual safety and efficacy. To substantiate the effects, benefits, and safety of applying an ND:YAG 1064 laser in the epilation process during esthetic treatment, a systematic review was carried out between October 2018 and January 2019, on studies published in the last 20 years. Randomized clinical trials in humans were considered that evaluated the efficacy, safety, and benefits of ND:YAG laser application at 1064 nm wavelengths for hair removal. A total of 198 articles were identified; 58 articles remained after their titles and abstracts were read; and 21 articles were selected after the removal of duplicates. After the integral reading, 13 of these articles were included in the systematic review (734 patients). The ND:YAG 1064 nm laser presents safety and promising, beneficial effects in epilation. However, further scientific studies with better methodologic quality are necessary to better standardize ND:YAG laser therapy and clarify its parameters for photoepilation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epilation; Laser; ND:YAG

Year:  2020        PMID: 31919681     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-019-02939-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  2 in total

Review 1.  Ozone Therapy for Dermatological Conditions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Débora Aparecida Oliveira Modena; Rafael de Castro Ferreira; Patricia Meyer Froes; Katya Cristina Rocha
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2022-05

2.  Comparison of submillisecond pulse (FRAC3) and long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser hair removal.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar Byalakere Shivanna; Chaithra Shenoy; Sree Lalitha; Priyanka Jaju; Anže Zorman
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 2.189

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.