| Literature DB >> 31919641 |
Mohammad Hasanuzzaman Rani1,2,3, Qunen Liu1,2, Ning Yu1,2, Yingxin Zhang1,2, Beifang Wang1,2, Yongrun Cao1,2, Yue Zhang1,2, Md Anowerul Islam1,2, Workie Anley Zegeye1,2,4, Liyong Cao5,6, Shihua Cheng7,8.
Abstract
Leaf senescence, which affects plant growth and yield in <span class="Species">rice, is an ideal target for crop improvement and remarkable ad<span class="Chemical">vances have been made to identify the mechanism underlying this process. We have characterized an early senile mutant es5 (early leaf senescence 5) in rice exhibiting leaf yellowing phenotype after the 4-leaf stage. This phenotype was confirmed by the higher accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdehyde (MDA), the disintegration of chloroplasts, reduction in chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate and up-regulation of senescence-associated genes (SAGs) like Osh36, OsI57, and OsI85. Positional cloning revealed that the es5 phenotype is the result of one base substitution in ES5, encoding phosphatidylserine synthase (PSS) family protein, which is involved in the base-exchange type reaction to synthesize the minor membrane phospholipid phosphatidylserine. Functional complementation of ES5 in the es5 plants completely restored the wild-type phenotype. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) analysis showed that es5 plants had increased levels of phosphatidylserine (PS) and decreased level of phosphatidylcholine (PC). These results provide evidence about the role of PS in rice leaf senescence.Entities:
Keywords: Early leaf senescence 5; Phosphatidylserine; Phosphatidylserine synthase; Rice (Oryza sativa L.); Sags
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31919641 PMCID: PMC7026238 DOI: 10.1007/s11103-019-00961-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Mol Biol ISSN: 0167-4412 Impact factor: 4.076
Fig. 1Phenotypic characterization of es5 plants. a–e Phenotypes of the wild-type and es5 mutant seedlings at 3-leaf stage (a), seedlings at 21 days after sowing (b), plants at tillering stage (c), upper three leaves at tillering stage (d) and plants at maturity stage (e); scale bar = 3, 5, 30, 4 and 40 cm, respectively at the figures of a–e. f Relative expression of the senescence associated genes. Values are mean ± SD of three biological replicates; p ≤ 0.01; Student’s t test
Fig. 2Physiological characterization of es5 plants. a–d kinetic analysis of photosynthetic rate, Chla, Chlb and carotenoids. Photosynthetic rate was measured in the flag leaves and chlorophyll pigments in the upper second leaves. e–f Relative expression of photosynthesis related genes (rbcL and Cab1) and chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation related genes (CHLD, RCCR1 and SGR). g–j TEM of wild-type (g, h) and es5 mutant (i, j) leaves at tillering stage. Cp chloroplast, Cw cell wall, P plastoglobuli, G granum, Thy thylakoid, Sg sugar granule and N nucleus. Values are mean ± SD of three biological replicates; p ≤ 0.01; Student’s t test
Fig. 3ROS accumulation and its scavenging. a–b Histochemical detection of H2O2 accumulation by DAB staining (a) and dead cells by Evans blue staining (b); scale bars = 2 cm. c–f Time-course analysis of early senescence indicators- MDA, SOD, CAT and SP contents in the upper second leaves. The data represent the means ± SD of three biological replicates
Fig. 4Map-based cloning of ES5 gene. a Preliminary mapping of ES5 between the SSR markers RM 3486 and RM 3664 on the long arm of chromosome 5. bES5 gene was fine mapped to an interval of 37.57 kb region by 1437 mutant individuals. c Six putative ORFs were annotated in the 37.57 kb region, and gDNA sequencing revealed that ORF2 had one base substitution from G-to-A and creation of a premature stop codon (d, e)
Fig. 5Complementation and overexpression analysis of ES5 gene in es5 mutant. a. Phenotype of WT, es5 mutant, complementation and overexpression plants at tillering stage; scale bar = 30 cm. b. Sequencing analysis of the ES5 in T0 transgenic plants. c. The leaf color from each plant; scale bar = 5 cm. d. Photosynthetic pigment contents of leaf WT, es5, complementation and overexpression plants. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3). Letters in the figure indicate the result of multiple comparison test; a, b, c indicate the significant differences on 0.05 level
Fig. 6Expression analysis of ES5. a Transcriptional level of ES5 at different organs- leaf blade, leaf sheath, stem, panicle and root. Values are mean ± SD of three biological replications. b–f GUS analysis of ES5 expression in different parts of the plants. Scale bar = 1 cm
Fig. 7PSS content in WT, es5, complementation and overexpression lines in the flag leaves at flowering stage. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3). Letters in the figure indicate the result of multiple comparison test; a, b, c indicate the significant differences on 0.05 level
Fig. 8Phospholipids level of WT, es5, complementation and overexpression lines in the flag leaves at flowering stage. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3). Letters in the figure indicate the result of multiple comparison test; a, b, c indicate the significant differences on 0.05 level