Literature DB >> 31919601

Efficacy of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy, in the short and long terms for patients with hemorrhoidal disease.

C Ferrandis1, D De Faucal2, J-M Fabreguette2, F Borie3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies comparing Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG HAL) with or without mucopexy with hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy techniques show no difference in short-term efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy of DG HAL with mucopexy (DG HAL+m) in the long term (beyond 5 years) for patients with hemorrhoidal disease.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients with symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease of any stage treated with DG HAL m at our outpatient colorectal surgery unit in April 2009-April 2013. Patients were followed clinically for 1 month and with a questionnaire until 5 years after surgery or until they underwent a second surgery for recurrent hemorrhoids.
RESULTS: Of 150 patients who underwent DG HALm during the study period 50 (33.3%) were lost to follow-up. A total of 100 patients (47 women, 53 men) were analysed. The average age was 50 (± 12) years. Twenty-six patients (17.3%) had had one or more prior procedures. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.2 days (median = 2 days; range = 1-8 days). No major complications were described. There were no deaths. At 5 years the mean bleeding, local discomfort and pain scores were significantly improved. Thirty-six patients (35.6%) had a recurrence during the follow-up period, and 20 (19.8%) of them underwent reoperation. The mean time between the operation and the second procedure was 36 months (median 27.4 months). The majority (61.4%) of patients were satisfied with the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low invasiveness of DG HALm the low morbidity associated with the procedure and the satisfactory functional outcomes, the long-term recurrence rate can be very high. However, only about half of the patients who experienced a recurrence needed a second operation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation; Efficacy; Hemorrhoidal disease

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31919601     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-02136-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  19 in total

Review 1.  Doppler-guided ligation of hemorrhoidal arteries with mucopexy: A technique for the future.

Authors:  C Ratto; V de Parades
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.043

2.  Cost-effectiveness of New Surgical Treatments for Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transanal Doppler-guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Mucopexy and Circular Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Paul A Lehur; Anne S Didnée; Jean-Luc Faucheron; Guillaume Meurette; Philippe Zerbib; Laurent Siproudhis; Béatrice Vinson-Bonnet; Anne Dubois; Christine Casa; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Long-term results and quality of life in patients treated with hemorrhoidectomy using two different techniques: Ligasure versus transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization.

Authors:  Nicola Zampieri; Roberto Castellani; Remo Andreoli; Andrea Geccherle
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair (HAL-RAR) for the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoids: long-term results in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Faucheron; Gilles Poncet; David Voirin; Bogdan Badic; Yves Gangner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation: nonexcisional surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  P P Dal Monte; C Tagariello; M Sarago; P Giordano; A Shafi; E Cudazzo; M Franzini
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal dearterialization/transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: Technical evolution and outcomes after 20 years.

Authors:  Marleny Novaes Figueiredo; Fábio Guilherme Campos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-27

7.  THD and mucopexy: Efficacy and controversy.

Authors:  Haytham Abudeeb; Ajogwu Ugwu; Jamshid Darabnia; Ahmed Hammad; Khurram Khan; Min Maung; Elizabeth McNulty; Abdul Latif Khan; Arijit Mukherjee
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-07-21

Review 8.  Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for hemorrhoidal disease: a single-center study on 1000 consecutive cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Carlo Ratto; Paola Campennì; Francesco Papeo; Lorenza Donisi; Francesco Litta; Angelo Parello
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus hemorrhoidectomy: 3-year follow-up assessment of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  P Denoya; J Tam; R Bergamaschi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Transanal dearterialization with targeted mucopexy is effective for advanced haemorrhoids.

Authors:  P Giordano; I Tomasi; A Pascariello; E Mills; S Elahi
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  1 in total

1.  Safety and effectiveness of hemorrhoidal artery ligation using the HAL-RAR technique for hemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  Konstantinos Karkalemis; Petros Loukas Chalkias; Anna Kasouli; Elina Chatzaki; Spilios Papanikolaou; Georgia Dedemadi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.445

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.