Literature DB >> 31919481

Differing, multiscale landscape effects on genetic diversity and differentiation in eastern chipmunks.

Elizabeth M Kierepka1, Sara J Anderson2, Robert K Swihart3, Olin E Rhodes4.   

Abstract

Understanding how habitat loss and fragmentation impact genetic variation is a major goal in landscape genetics, but to date, most studies have focused solely on the correlation between intervening matrix and genetic differentiation at a single spatial scale. Several caveats exist in these study designs, among them is the inability to include measures of genetic diversity in addition to differentiation. Both genetic metrics help predict population persistence, but are expected to function at differing spatial scales, which requires a multiscale investigation. In this study, we sampled two distinct spatial scales in 31 independent landscapes along a gradient of landscape context (i.e., forest amount, configuration, and types of intervening matrix) to investigate how landscape heterogeneity influences genetic diversity and differentiation in the forest-associated eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus). Overall, quality of intervening matrix was correlated with genetic differentiation at multiple spatial scales, whereas only configuration was associated with regional scale genetic diversity. Habitat amount, in contrast, did not influence genetic differentiation or diversity at either spatial scale. Based on our findings, landscape effects on genetic variation appears to differ based on spatial scale, the type of genetic response variable, and random variation among landscapes, making extrapolation of results from single scale, unreplicated studies difficult. We encourage landscape geneticists to utilize multiscale, replicated landscapes with both genetic diversity, and differentiation to gain a more comprehensive understanding of how habitat loss and fragmentation influence genetic variation.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31919481      PMCID: PMC7029014          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-020-0293-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  21 in total

1.  The relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population genetic variation in the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis).

Authors:  Douglas J Bruggeman; Thorsten Wiegand; Néstor Fernández
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 2.  Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation.

Authors:  Robert M Ewers; Raphael K Didham
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-12-01

3.  Thresholds in songbird occurrence in relation to landscape structure.

Authors:  Matthew G Betts; Graham J Forbes; Antony W Diamond
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Patchy reaction-diffusion and population abundance: the relative importance of habitat amount and arrangement.

Authors:  Curtis H Flather; Michael Bevers
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Contemporary and historic factors influence differently genetic differentiation and diversity in a tropical palm.

Authors:  C da Silva Carvalho; M C Ribeiro; M C Côrtes; M Galetti; R G Collevatti
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Determinants of population genetic structure in eastern Chipmunks (Tamias striatus): the role of landscape barriers and sex-biased dispersal.

Authors:  Jennifer L Chambers; Dany Garant
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Replicated landscape genetic and network analyses reveal wide variation in functional connectivity for American pikas.

Authors:  Jessica A Castillo; Clinton W Epps; Mackenzie R Jeffress; Chris Ray; Thomas J Rodhouse; Donelle Schwalm
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model.

Authors:  Lloyd J Edwards; Keith E Muller; Russell D Wolfinger; Bahjat F Qaqish; Oliver Schabenberger
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Assessing the permeability of landscape features to animal movement: using genetic structure to infer functional connectivity.

Authors:  Sara J Anderson; Elizabeth M Kierepka; Robert K Swihart; Emily K Latch; Olin E Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Matrix matters: differences of grand skink metapopulation parameters in native tussock grasslands and exotic pasture grasslands.

Authors:  Konstanze Gebauer; Katharine J M Dickinson; Peter A Whigham; Philip J Seddon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing the influence of the amount of reachable habitat on genetic structure using landscape and genetic graphs.

Authors:  Paul Savary; Jean-Christophe Foltête; Maarten J van Strien; Hervé Moal; Gilles Vuidel; Stéphane Garnier
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Multiscale patterns of isolation by ecology and fine-scale population structure in Texas bobcats.

Authors:  Imogene A Cancellare; Elizabeth M Kierepka; Jan Janecka; Byron Weckworth; Richard T Kazmaier; Rocky Ward
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.