Harmen D Vermeijden1, Jelle P van der List2, Robert O'Brien1, Gregory S DiFelice3. 1. Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, U.S.A. 2. Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3. Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, U.S.A.. Electronic address: difeliceg@hss.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the extent to which patients forget their operative knee joint on a daily basis following arthroscopic primary repair as compared with reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) at short- to mid-term follow-up. METHODS: For this retrospective study, all patients undergoing ACL surgery between May 2012 and May 2017 were identified. All patients were treated with the algorithm of undergoing arthroscopic primary repair for proximal tears and reconstruction for nonrepairable tears. Patients were contacted to complete the Forgotten Joint Score-12 questionnaire between 2 and 5 years following surgery. A greater score represents a more favorable outcome indicating the patient's ability to "forget" the joint in everyday life, whereas lower scores indicate a less-favorable outcome. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests and χ2 tests, and multiple linear regression analysis was performed to correct for potential confounders. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients completed the questionnaire (57%). Patients who underwent primary repair thought about their operated knee less when compared with those patients who underwent reconstruction (85.3 ± 14.2 vs 74.3 ± 23.3, P = .022). These differences were significantly greater in patients older than 30 years (85.3 ± 12.9 vs 62.6 ± 24.9, P = .007), male patients (85.0 ± 13.6 vs 72.5 ± 24.7, P = .037), and patients with a body mass index greater than 25 (85.9 ± 14.5 vs 64.7 ± 25.6, P = .009). After we corrected for potential confounders, the overall difference remained significant (P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the data in this study, patients undergoing arthroscopic primary ACL repair can expect to have less daily awareness of their operated knee at short- to mid-term follow-up as compared with patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, level III. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PURPOSE: To assess the extent to which patients forget their operative knee joint on a daily basis following arthroscopic primary repair as compared with reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) at short- to mid-term follow-up. METHODS: For this retrospective study, all patients undergoing ACL surgery between May 2012 and May 2017 were identified. All patients were treated with the algorithm of undergoing arthroscopic primary repair for proximal tears and reconstruction for nonrepairable tears. Patients were contacted to complete the Forgotten Joint Score-12 questionnaire between 2 and 5 years following surgery. A greater score represents a more favorable outcome indicating the patient's ability to "forget" the joint in everyday life, whereas lower scores indicate a less-favorable outcome. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests and χ2 tests, and multiple linear regression analysis was performed to correct for potential confounders. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients completed the questionnaire (57%). Patients who underwent primary repair thought about their operated knee less when compared with those patients who underwent reconstruction (85.3 ± 14.2 vs 74.3 ± 23.3, P = .022). These differences were significantly greater in patients older than 30 years (85.3 ± 12.9 vs 62.6 ± 24.9, P = .007), male patients (85.0 ± 13.6 vs 72.5 ± 24.7, P = .037), and patients with a body mass index greater than 25 (85.9 ± 14.5 vs 64.7 ± 25.6, P = .009). After we corrected for potential confounders, the overall difference remained significant (P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the data in this study, patients undergoing arthroscopic primary ACL repair can expect to have less daily awareness of their operated knee at short- to mid-term follow-up as compared with patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, level III. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Patrick G Robinson; Paul Gaston; Thomas R Williamson; Iain R Murray; Julian F Maempel; Conor S Rankin; Deborah J MacDonald; David F Hamilton Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-08-30
Authors: Harmen D Vermeijden; Edoardo Monaco; Fabio Marzilli; Xiuyi A Yang; Jelle P van der List; Andrea Ferretti; Gregory S DiFelice Journal: Adv Orthop Date: 2022-09-13
Authors: Mikołaj Wypych; Robert Lundqvist; Dariusz Witoński; Rafał Kęska; Anna Szmigielska; Przemysław T Paradowski Journal: Open Med (Wars) Date: 2021-05-29
Authors: Jelle P van der List; Harmen D Vermeijden; Inger N Sierevelt; Maarten V Rademakers; Mark L M Falke; Gijs T T Helmerhorst; Roy A G Hoogeslag; Wybren A van der Wal; Arthur van Noort; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 2.362