| Literature DB >> 31918388 |
Kangyang Chen1, Hexia Chen2, Chuanlong Zhou2, Yichao Huang2, Xiangyang Qi1, Ruqin Shen3, Fengrui Liu4, Min Zuo5, Xinyi Zou1, Jinfeng Wang6, Yan Zhang6, Da Chen2, Xingguo Chen7, Yongfeng Deng8, Hongqiang Ren6.
Abstract
The water quality prediction performance of machine learning models may be not only dependent on the models, but also dependent on the parameters in data set chosen for training the learning models. Moreover, the key water parameters should also be identified by the learning models, in order to further reduce prediction costs and improve prediction efficiency. Here we endeavored for the first time to compare the water quality prediction performance of 10 learning models (7 traditional and 3 ensemble models) using big data (33,612 observations) from the major rivers and lakes in China from 2012 to 2018, based on the precision, recall, F1-score, weighted F1-score, and explore the potential key water parameters for future model prediction. Our results showed that the bigger data could improve the performance of learning models in prediction of water quality. Compared to other 7 models, decision tree (DT), random forest (RF) and deep cascade forest (DCF) trained by data sets of pH, DO, CODMn, and NH3-N had significantly better performance in prediction of all 6 Levels of water quality recommended by Chinese government. Moreover, two key water parameter sets (DO, CODMn, and NH3-N; CODMn, and NH3-N) were identified and validated by DT, RF and DCF to be high specificities for perdition water quality. Therefore, DT, RF and DCF with selected key water parameters could be prioritized for future water quality monitoring and providing timely water quality warning.Entities:
Keywords: Deep cascade forest; Ensemble methods; Machine learning models; The key water parameters; Water quality prediction
Year: 2019 PMID: 31918388 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Water Res ISSN: 0043-1354 Impact factor: 11.236