Literature DB >> 31918229

Could 3D models of cancer enhance drug screening?

Virginia Brancato1, Joaquim Miguel Oliveira2, Vitor Manuel Correlo2, Rui Luis Reis2, Subhas C Kundu3.   

Abstract

Cancer is a multifaceted pathology, where cellular and acellular players interact to drive cancer progression and, in the worst-case, metastasis. The current methods to investigate the heterogeneous nature of cancer are inadequate, since they rely on 2D cell cultures and animal models. The cell line-based drug efficacy and toxicity assays are not able to predict the tumor response to anti-cancer agents and it is already widely discussed how molecular pathway are not recapitulated in vitro so called flat biology. On the other side, animal models often fail to detect the side-effects of drugs, mimic the metastatic progression or the interaction between cancer and immune system, due to biologic difference in human and animals. Moreover, ethical and regulatory issues limit animal experimentation. Every year pharma/biotech companies lose resources in drug discovery and testing processes that are successful only in 5% of the cases. There is an urgent need to validate accurate and predictive platforms in order to enhance drug-testing process taking into account the physiopathology of the tumor microenvironment. Three dimensional in vitro tumor models could enhance drug manufactures in developing effective drugs for cancer diseases. The 3D in vitro cancer models can improve the predictability of toxicity and drug sensitivity in cancer. Despite the demonstrated advantages of 3D in vitro disease systems when compared to 2D culture and animal models, they still do not reach the standardization required for preclinical trials. This review highlights in vitro models that may be used as preclinical models, accelerating the drug development process towards more precise and personalized standard of care for cancer patients. We describe the state-of-the art of 3D in vitro culture systems, with a focus on how these different approaches could be coupled in order to achieve a compromise between standardization and reliability in recapitulating tumor microenvironment and drug response.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D cancer models; Bioprinting; In vitro screening platform; Organoids; Preclinical trial; Tumor microenvironment; Tumor-on-chip

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31918229     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  33 in total

1.  Three dimensional engineered models to study hypoxia biology in breast cancer.

Authors:  Vaishali Aggarwal; Oshin Miranda; Paul A Johnston; Shilpa Sant
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 8.679

2.  Coupling Micro-Physiological Systems and Biosensors for Improving Cancer Biomarkers Detection.

Authors:  Virginia Brancato; Rui L Reis; Subhas C Kundu
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Patient-Derived Breast Cancer Tissue Cultures for Anti-Endocrine Drug Assays.

Authors:  Giacomo Domenici; Gonçalo Trindade; Marta F Estrada; Ana Luísa Cartaxo; Paula M Alves; Saudade André; Catarina Brito
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 4.  The Tumor Microenvironment: An Introduction to the Development of Microfluidic Devices.

Authors:  B Kundu; D Caballero; C M Abreu; R L Reis; S C Kundu
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 5.  The Dynamic Interaction between Extracellular Matrix Remodeling and Breast Tumor Progression.

Authors:  Jorge Martinez; Patricio C Smith
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Descriptive Proteome Analysis to Investigate Context-Dependent Treatment Responses to OXPHOS Inhibition in Colon Carcinoma Cells Grown as Monolayer and Multicellular Tumor Spheroids.

Authors:  Julia Steinmetz; Wojciech Senkowski; Johan Lengqvist; Jenny Rubin; Elena Ossipova; Stephanie Herman; Rolf Larsson; Per-Johan Jakobsson; Mårten Fryknäs; Kim Kultima
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-07-06

7.  Ex Vivo Analysis of Primary Tumor Specimens for Evaluation of Cancer Therapeutics.

Authors:  Cristina E Tognon; Rosalie C Sears; Gordon B Mills; Joe W Gray; Jeffrey W Tyner
Journal:  Annu Rev Cancer Biol       Date:  2020-12-08

8.  Recruitment, Infiltration, and Cytotoxicity of HLA-Independent Killer Lymphocytes in Three-Dimensional Melanoma Models.

Authors:  Ilenia Iaia; Loretta Gammaitoni; Giulia Cattaneo; Lidia Giraudo; Chiara Donini; Erika Fiorino; Luca Primo; Fabrizio Carnevale-Schianca; Massimo Aglietta; Alberto Puliafito; Dario Sangiolo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Horizontal transfer of the stemness-related markers EZH2 and GLI1 by neuroblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles in stromal cells.

Authors:  Aranzazu Villasante; Amandine Godier-Furnemont; Alberto Hernandez-Barranco; Johanne Le Coq; Jasminka Boskovic; Hector Peinado; Jaume Mora; Josep Samitier; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 10.171

10.  Recent advances in 3D models of tumor invasion.

Authors:  Della S Shin; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.