Literature DB >> 31917664

Phase-Contrast MRI: Physics, Techniques, and Clinical Applications.

David T Wymer1, Kunal P Patel1, William F Burke1, Vinay K Bhatia1.   

Abstract

With phase-contrast imaging, the MRI signal is used to visualize and quantify velocity. This imaging modality relies on phase data, which are intrinsic to all MRI signals. With use of bipolar gradients, degrees of phase shift are encoded and in turn correlated directly with the velocity of protons. The acquisition of diagnostic-quality images requires selection of the correct imaging plane to ensure accurate measurement and selection of the encoding velocity and thus prevent aliasing and achieve the highest signal-to-noise ratio. Multiple applications of phase-contrast imaging are actively used in clinical practice. One of the most common clinical uses is in cardiac valvular flow imaging, at which the data are used to assess the severity of valvular disease and quantify the shunt fraction. In neurologic imaging, phase-contrast imaging can be used to measure the flow of cerebrospinal fluid. This measurement can aid in the diagnosis and direct management of normal pressure hydrocephalus or be used to evaluate the severity of stenosis, such as that in Chiari I malformations. At vascular analysis, phase-contrast imaging can be used to visualize arterial and venous flow, and this application is used most commonly in the brain. Three-dimensional imaging can yield highly detailed flow data in a technique referred to as four-dimensional flow. A more recently identified application is in MR elastography. Shear waves created by using an impulse device can be velocity encoded, and this velocity is directly proportional to the stiffness of the organ, or the shear modulus. This imaging modality is most commonly used in the liver for evaluation of cirrhosis and steatosis, although research on the assessment of other organs is being performed. Phase-contrast imaging is an important tool in the arsenal of MRI examinations and has many applications. Proper use of phase-contrast imaging requires an understanding of the many practical and technical factors and unique physics principles underlying the technique.©RSNA, 2020.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31917664     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020190039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  11 in total

1.  Prognosis of ischemia recurrence in patients with moderate intracranial atherosclerotic disease using quantitative MRA measurements.

Authors:  Jeff Joseph; Benjamin Weppner; Nandor K Pinter; Mohammad Mahdi Shiraz Bhurwani; Andre Monteiro; Ammad Baig; Jason Davies; Adnan Siddiqui; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 2.  Pediatric magnetic resonance angiography: to contrast or not to contrast.

Authors:  Erin K Opfer; Nathan S Artz; Grace S Mitchell; Sherwin S Chan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-08-12

3.  Polymeric dual-modal imaging nanoprobe with two-photon aggregation-induced emission for fluorescence imaging and gadolinium-chelation for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Xueyang Xiao; Hao Cai; Qiaorong Huang; Bing Wang; Xiaoming Wang; Qiang Luo; Yinggang Li; Hu Zhang; Qiyong Gong; Xuelei Ma; Zhongwei Gu; Kui Luo
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-05-07

4.  Portal Vein Pulsatility Index as a Potential Risk of Venous Congestion Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Prospective Study on Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Osama Abou-Arab; Christophe Beyls; Mouhamed Djahoum Moussa; Pierre Huette; Elodie Beaudelot; Mathieu Guilbart; Bruno De Broca; Thierry Yzet; Hervé Dupont; Roger Bouzerar; Yazine Mahjoub
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Associations of intracranial artery length and branch number on non-contrast enhanced MRA with cognitive impairment in individuals with carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Zhensen Chen; Anders Gould; Duygu Baylam Geleri; Niranjan Balu; Li Chen; Baocheng Chu; Kristi Pimentel; Gador Canton; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Pearls and Pitfalls in the Magnetic Resonance Diagnosis of Dural Sinus Thrombosis: A Comprehensive Guide for the Trainee Radiologist.

Authors:  Vivek Pai; Iram Khan; Yih Yian Sitoh; Bela Purohit
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2020-11-28

Review 7.  The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Sanjay Sivalokanathan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26

Review 8.  Evaluation of low gradient severe aortic stenosis: should we change our outlook in the analysis of clinical data?

Authors:  Ivan Corazza; Margherita Zecchi; Romano Zannoli
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-10

Review 9.  Non-Invasive Evaluation of Cerebral Microvasculature Using Pre-Clinical MRI: Principles, Advantages and Limitations.

Authors:  Bram Callewaert; Elizabeth A V Jones; Uwe Himmelreich; Willy Gsell
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21

10.  Vessel length on SNAP MRA and TOF MRA is a potential imaging biomarker for brain blood flow.

Authors:  Anders Gould; Zhensen Chen; Duygu Baylam Geleri; Niranjan Balu; Zechen Zhou; Li Chen; Baocheng Chu; Kristi Pimentel; Gador Canton; Thomas Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.