Stephanie Chan1, Gerald N Glickman1, Karl F Woodmansey1, Jianing He2. 1. Department of Endodontics, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas. 2. Department of Endodontics, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: jhe@tamhsc.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the clinical and radiographic outcomes of root-end microsurgery in a postgraduate program in endodontics using modern techniques and calcium silicate-based root-end filling materials (ProRoot MTA; Dentsply International, Johnson City, TN, and EndoSequence Root Repair Material [ERRM]; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA) and to identify any potential prognostic factors that may have affected healing outcomes. METHODS: Clinical records and periapical radiographs were collected from patients who had undergone endodontic microsurgery between 2007 and 2018 in a postgraduate endodontic clinic with a minimum follow-up interval of 6 months. Either ProRoot MTA or ERRM was used as the root-end filling material. Outcomes were categorized into healed, healing, and nonhealing based on clinical and radiographic findings. Healed and healing cases were pooled and considered as successes, whereas nonhealing cases were considered as failures. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients with 142 teeth were included in the final analysis. Seventy-six cases were root-end filled with ProRoot MTA and 66 root-end filled with ERRM. The ProRoot MTA group had a success rate of 92.1%, and the ERRM group had a success rate of 92.4% with no significant difference between the groups (P > .05). Vertical root fracture was found to be the predominant cause of failure. No patient- or treatment-related factor was identified to have any significant impact on healing. CONCLUSIONS: High overall success can be achieved in a postgraduate endodontic program when either ProRoot MTA or ERRM is used as the root-end filling material.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the clinical and radiographic outcomes of root-end microsurgery in a postgraduate program in endodontics using modern techniques and calcium silicate-based root-end filling materials (ProRoot MTA; Dentsply International, Johnson City, TN, and EndoSequence Root Repair Material [ERRM]; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA) and to identify any potential prognostic factors that may have affected healing outcomes. METHODS: Clinical records and periapical radiographs were collected from patients who had undergone endodontic microsurgery between 2007 and 2018 in a postgraduate endodontic clinic with a minimum follow-up interval of 6 months. Either ProRoot MTA or ERRM was used as the root-end filling material. Outcomes were categorized into healed, healing, and nonhealing based on clinical and radiographic findings. Healed and healing cases were pooled and considered as successes, whereas nonhealing cases were considered as failures. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients with 142 teeth were included in the final analysis. Seventy-six cases were root-end filled with ProRoot MTA and 66 root-end filled with ERRM. The ProRoot MTA group had a success rate of 92.1%, and the ERRM group had a success rate of 92.4% with no significant difference between the groups (P > .05). Vertical root fracture was found to be the predominant cause of failure. No patient- or treatment-related factor was identified to have any significant impact on healing. CONCLUSIONS: High overall success can be achieved in a postgraduate endodontic program when either ProRoot MTA or ERRM is used as the root-end filling material.