Literature DB >> 31916929

In vitro activities of telithromycin against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms compared with azithromycin, clindamycin, vancomycin and daptomycin.

Jin-Xin Zheng1,2, Hao-Peng Tu1, Xiang Sun1, Guang-Jian Xu1, Jun-Wen Chen1, Qi-Wen Deng1, Zhi-Jian Yu1, Di Qu2.   

Abstract

Introduction. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms are difficult to treat and the effect of telithromycin treatment is still unclear.Aim. This study aimed to explore the effect of telithromycin against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms compared with azithromycin, clindamycin, vancomycin and daptomycin.Methodology. Eight methicillin-susceptible and eight methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates (MSSA and MRSA, respectively) were used for this study. Biofilm biomasses were detected by crystal violet staining and the adherent cells in the established biofilms were quantified by determination of colony-forming units (c.f.u.). The RNA levels of biofilm formation-related genes were determined by RT-qPCR.Results. Telithromycin [8× minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)] eradicated more established biofilms than azithromycin or clindamycin in the four MSSA isolates, and eliminated the established biofilms of six MRSA isolates more effectively than vancomycin or daptomycin. Telithromycin (8× MIC) killed more adherent cells in the established biofilms than azithromycin or clindamycin in the six MSSA isolates, and killed more adherent cells than vancomycin in all eight MRSA isolates. Daptomycin also showed an excellent effect on the adherent cells of MRSA isolates, with similarresults to telithromycin. The effect of a subinhibitory concentration of telithromycin (1/4× MIC) was significantly superior to that of azithromycin or clindamycin, inhibiting the biofilm formation of six MSSA isolates and seven MRSA isolates more effectively than vancomycin or daptomycin. The RNA levels of agrA, agrC, clfA, icaA and sigB decreased when treated with telithromycin (1/4× MIC).Conclusions. Telithromycin is more effective than azithromycin, clindamycin, vancomycin, or daptomycin against S. aureus biofilms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococcus aureus; adherent cells; biofilm; subinhibitory concentrations; telithromycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31916929     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.001122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  3 in total

1.  Clemastine Inhibits the Biofilm and Hemolytic of Staphylococcus aureus through the GdpP Protein.

Authors:  Yongpeng Shang; Jie Guo; Yuxi Zhao; Junwen Chen; Qingyin Meng; Di Qu; Jinxin Zheng; Zhijian Yu; Yang Wu; Qiwen Deng
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-03-02

2.  Lapatinib Acts against Biofilm Formation and the Hemolytic Activity of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Yansong Liu; Yiyi Shi; Hang Cheng; Junwen Chen; Zhanwen Wang; Qingyin Meng; Yuanyuan Tang; Zhijian Yu; Jinxin Zheng; Yongpeng Shang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-03-03

Review 3.  Virulence alterations in staphylococcus aureus upon treatment with the sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics.

Authors:  Juan Chen; Huyue Zhou; Jingbin Huang; Rong Zhang; Xiancai Rao
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 10.479

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.