Jeffery C Powers1, Abdelkarim Sabri1, Dalia Al-Bataineh1, Dhruv Chotalia1, Xinji Guo1, Florence Tsipenyuk1, Remus Berretta1, Pavithra Kavitha1, Heramba Gopi1, Steven R Houser1, Mohsin Khan2, Emily J Tsai1,3, Fabio A Recchia1,4. 1. From the Cardiovascular Research Center (J.C.P, A.S., D.A.-B., D.C., X.G., F.T., R.B., P.K., H.G., S.R.H., F.A.R.), Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. 2. the Center for Translational Medicine (M.K.), Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York (E.J.T.). 4. Institute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa; and Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy (F.A.R.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The failing right ventricle (RV) does not respond like the left ventricle (LV) to guideline-directed medical therapy of heart failure, perhaps due to interventricular differences in their molecular pathophysiology. METHODS: Using the canine tachypacing-induced biventricular heart failure (HF) model, we tested the hypothesis that interventricular differences in microRNAs (miRs) expression distinguish failing RV from failing LV. RESULTS: Severe RV dysfunction was indicated by elevated end-diastolic pressure (11.3±2.5 versus 5.7±2.0 mm Hg; P<0.0001) and diminished fractional area change (24.9±7.1 versus 48.0±3.6%; P<0.0001) relative to prepacing baselines. Microarray analysis of ventricular tissue revealed that miR-21 and miR-221, 2 activators of profibrotic and proliferative processes, increased the most, at 4- and 2-fold, respectively, in RV-HF versus RV-Control. Neither miR-21 or miR-221 was statistically significantly different in LV-HF versus LV-Control. These changes were accompanied by more extensive fibrosis in RV-HF than LV-HF. To test whether miR-21 and miR-221 upregulation is specific to RV cellular response to mechanical and hormonal stimuli associated with HF, we subjected fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes isolated from normal canine RV and LV to cyclic overstretch and aldosterone. These 2 stressors markedly upregulated miR-21 and miR-221 in RV fibroblasts but not in LV fibroblasts nor cardiomyocytes of either ventricle. Furthermore, miR-21/221 knockdown significantly attenuated RV but not LV fibroblast proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a novel, biological difference between RV and LV fibroblasts that might underlie distinctions in pathological remodeling of the RV in biventricular HF.
BACKGROUND: The failing right ventricle (RV) does not respond like the left ventricle (LV) to guideline-directed medical therapy of heart failure, perhaps due to interventricular differences in their molecular pathophysiology. METHODS: Using the canine tachypacing-induced biventricular heart failure (HF) model, we tested the hypothesis that interventricular differences in microRNAs (miRs) expression distinguish failing RV from failing LV. RESULTS: Severe RV dysfunction was indicated by elevated end-diastolic pressure (11.3±2.5 versus 5.7±2.0 mm Hg; P<0.0001) and diminished fractional area change (24.9±7.1 versus 48.0±3.6%; P<0.0001) relative to prepacing baselines. Microarray analysis of ventricular tissue revealed that miR-21 and miR-221, 2 activators of profibrotic and proliferative processes, increased the most, at 4- and 2-fold, respectively, in RV-HF versus RV-Control. Neither miR-21 or miR-221 was statistically significantly different in LV-HF versus LV-Control. These changes were accompanied by more extensive fibrosis in RV-HF than LV-HF. To test whether miR-21 and miR-221 upregulation is specific to RV cellular response to mechanical and hormonal stimuli associated with HF, we subjected fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes isolated from normal canine RV and LV to cyclic overstretch and aldosterone. These 2 stressors markedly upregulated miR-21 and miR-221 in RV fibroblasts but not in LV fibroblasts nor cardiomyocytes of either ventricle. Furthermore, miR-21/221 knockdown significantly attenuated RV but not LV fibroblast proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a novel, biological difference between RV and LV fibroblasts that might underlie distinctions in pathological remodeling of the RV in biventricular HF.
Authors: Howard Y Chang; Jen-Tsan Chi; Sandrine Dudoit; Chanda Bondre; Matt van de Rijn; David Botstein; Patrick O Brown Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-09-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stephen H McKellar; Hadi Javan; Megan E Bowen; Xiaoquing Liu; Christin L Schaaf; Casey M Briggs; Huashan Zou; Arnold David Gomez; Osama M Abdullah; Ed W Hsu; Craig H Selzman Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-11-10 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Robin Verjans; Tim Peters; Francisco Javier Beaumont; Rick van Leeuwen; Tessa van Herwaarden; Wouter Verhesen; Chantal Munts; Mitchell Bijnen; Michiel Henkens; Javier Diez; Leon J de Windt; Frans A van Nieuwenhoven; Marc van Bilsen; Marie José Goumans; Stephane Heymans; Arantxa González; Blanche Schroen Journal: Hypertension Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Lena Bosch; Carolyn S P Lam; Lingli Gong; Siew Pang Chan; David Sim; Daniel Yeo; Fazlur Jaufeerally; Kui Toh Gerard Leong; Hean Yee Ong; Tze Pin Ng; Arthur Mark Richards; Fatih Arslan; Lieng H Ling Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Felix Woitek; Lorena Zentilin; Nicholas E Hoffman; Jeffery C Powers; Isabel Ottiger; Suraj Parikh; Anna M Kulczycki; Marykathryn Hurst; Nadja Ring; Tao Wang; Farah Shaikh; Polina Gross; Harinder Singh; Mikhail A Kolpakov; Axel Linke; Steven R Houser; Victor Rizzo; Abdelkarim Sabri; Muniswamy Madesh; Mauro Giacca; Fabio A Recchia Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Thomas Thum; Carina Gross; Jan Fiedler; Thomas Fischer; Stephan Kissler; Markus Bussen; Paolo Galuppo; Steffen Just; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Stefan Frantz; Mirco Castoldi; Jürgen Soutschek; Victor Koteliansky; Andreas Rosenwald; M Albert Basson; Jonathan D Licht; John T R Pena; Sara H Rouhanifard; Martina U Muckenthaler; Thomas Tuschl; Gail R Martin; Johann Bauersachs; Stefan Engelhardt Journal: Nature Date: 2008-11-30 Impact factor: 49.962