Kalliopi Gourgouli1, Ioanna Gourgouli2, Georgios Tsaousis3, Sofia Spai2, Maria Niskopoulou4, Spiros Efthimiopoulos5, Klea Lamnissou6. 1. Division of Genetics and Biotechnology, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Ilissia, 15701, Athens, Greece. kgourgouli@gmail.com. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Sismanoglio General Hospital of Attica, Athens, Greece. 3. Division of Cell Biology and Biophysics, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 4. Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon, Agias Paraskevis 118, Chalandri, 15232, Athens, Greece. 5. Division of Animal and Human Physiology, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 6. Division of Genetics and Biotechnology, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Ilissia, 15701, Athens, Greece.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether gene polymorphisms which are associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) influence treatments' response and specifically the antioxidant supplementation in dry AMD patients, as well as the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in neovascular AMD patients. METHODS: A total of 170 patients with dry AMD and 52 neovascular AMD patients were genotyped for the following single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): rs1061170/Y402H in CFH gene, rs10490924/A69S in ARMS2 gene, rs9332739/E318D and rs547154/IVS10 in C2 gene, and rs4151667/L9H and rs2072633/IVS17 in CFB gene. Treatment response was evaluated by comparing visual acuity and optical coherence tomography between baseline and at the end of the treatment. RESULTS: Τhe CFH/Y402H variant was associated with the response to antioxidants in dry AMD patients. Carriers of one or two CFH risk alleles displayed a lower chance of responding compared to those with no risk allele. No association of antioxidants' response and ARMS2/A69S genotype was identified. The analysis of the C2 and CFB genetic variants (protective SNPs) revealed that antioxidant supplementation was much more effective in protective SNP carriers. In neovascular AMD patients, the analysis indicated that Y402H homozygous patients were less likely to respond to anti-VEGF therapy compared to heterozygous. Regarding the ARMS2/A69S genotype, carriers of the risk variant experienced significantly worse treatment outcome compared to wild-type patients. CONCLUSION: In AMD patients, the efficacy of the antioxidant supplementation and the anti-VEGF therapy appears to differ by genotype. The detection of genetic variants, associated with treatment responsiveness, could lead to improved visual outcomes through genotype-directed therapy.
PURPOSE: To determine whether gene polymorphisms which are associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) influence treatments' response and specifically the antioxidant supplementation in dry AMD patients, as well as the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in neovascular AMD patients. METHODS: A total of 170 patients with dry AMD and 52 neovascular AMD patients were genotyped for the following single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): rs1061170/Y402H in CFH gene, rs10490924/A69S in ARMS2 gene, rs9332739/E318D and rs547154/IVS10 in C2 gene, and rs4151667/L9H and rs2072633/IVS17 in CFB gene. Treatment response was evaluated by comparing visual acuity and optical coherence tomography between baseline and at the end of the treatment. RESULTS: Τhe CFH/Y402H variant was associated with the response to antioxidants in dry AMD patients. Carriers of one or two CFH risk alleles displayed a lower chance of responding compared to those with no risk allele. No association of antioxidants' response and ARMS2/A69S genotype was identified. The analysis of the C2 and CFB genetic variants (protective SNPs) revealed that antioxidant supplementation was much more effective in protective SNP carriers. In neovascular AMD patients, the analysis indicated that Y402H homozygous patients were less likely to respond to anti-VEGF therapy compared to heterozygous. Regarding the ARMS2/A69S genotype, carriers of the risk variant experienced significantly worse treatment outcome compared to wild-type patients. CONCLUSION: In AMD patients, the efficacy of the antioxidant supplementation and the anti-VEGF therapy appears to differ by genotype. The detection of genetic variants, associated with treatment responsiveness, could lead to improved visual outcomes through genotype-directed therapy.
Authors: Robert J Klein; Caroline Zeiss; Emily Y Chew; Jen-Yue Tsai; Richard S Sackler; Chad Haynes; Alice K Henning; John Paul SanGiovanni; Shrikant M Mane; Susan T Mayne; Michael B Bracken; Frederick L Ferris; Jurg Ott; Colin Barnstable; Josephine Hoh Journal: Science Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Melissa J Assel; Fan Li; Ying Wang; Andrew S Allen; Keith A Baggerly; Andrew J Vickers Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Nicolas Leveziel; Nathalie Puche; Florence Richard; John E A Somner; Jennyfer Zerbib; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin; Salomon Y Cohen; Jean-François Korobelnik; José Sahel; Gisèle Soubrane; Pascale Benlian; Eric H Souied Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-12-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Milam A Brantley; Amy M Fang; Jennifer M King; Asheesh Tewari; Steven M Kymes; Alan Shiels Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 12.079