Literature DB >> 31915959

Re-examining the 1-mm margin and submucosal depth of invasion: a review of 216 malignant colorectal polyps.

Kyra B Berg1, Jennifer J Telford2,3, Laura Gentile3, David F Schaeffer4,5,6.   

Abstract

Malignant colorectal polyps have a risk of lymph node metastases between 9 and 24%, but patients who are negative for certain histologic poor prognostic factors have the potential to be treated with polypectomy alone. Retrospective cohort of 216 malignant polyps from 213 patients identified through the British Columbia Colon Screening Program. Complete pathologic reporting (reporting of tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, margin status, and tumor budding) was present in only 43% of patients. Sixty-one patients had no poor prognostic factors on polypectomy, and 23 (37%) of those underwent surgery. A positive margin cutoff of tumor at cautery showed significantly increased rates of lymph node metastases (p = 0.04) compared to a margin of greater than 0 mm, and polyps with a margin of greater than 0 mm had no risk of residual carcinoma. A submucosal depth of ≥ 2000 μm had an increased rate of lymph node metastases compared to < 2000 μm (p = 0.01). Malignant polyps with either tumor at cautery or a submucosal depth of ≥ 2000 μm, compared to polyps without these risk factors, had a relative risk for lymph node metastases of 16.3. Adoption of submucosal depth and refinement of the cutoffs for positive margin and submucosal depth have the potential to identify high-risk patients and reduce the number of surgeries required in patients with malignant polyps, a group that continues to grow significantly in part due to the introduction of colon screening programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon screening; Malignant polyps; Margin; Submucosal depth; pT1

Year:  2020        PMID: 31915959     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-019-02711-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  3 in total

1.  Impact of ≥ 0.1-mm free resection margins on local intramural residual cancer after local excision of T1 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kim M Gijsbers; Lisa van der Schee; Tessa van Veen; Annemarie M van Berkel; Femke Boersma; Carolien M Bronkhorst; Paul D Didden; Krijn J C Haasnoot; Anne M Jonker; Koen Kessels; Nikki Knijn; Ineke van Lijnschoten; Clinton Mijnals; Anya N Milne; Freek C P Moll; Ruud W M Schrauwen; Ramon-Michel Schreuder; Tom J Seerden; Marcel B W M Spanier; Jochim S Terhaar Sive Droste; Emma Witteveen; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Frank P Vleggaar; Miangela M Laclé; Frank Ter Borg; Leon M G Moons
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-04-14

2.  Factors predicting occurrence and therapeutic choice in malignant colorectal polyps: a study of 13 years of colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  Sergiu Marian Cazacu; Adrian Săftoiu; Sevastiţa Iordache; Mirela Corina Ghiluşi; Claudia Valentina Georgescu; Vlad Florin Iovănescu; Carmen Daniela Neagoe; Liliana Streba; Mihaela Caliţa; Elena Daniela Burtea; Dan Cârţu; Polliana Mihaela Leru
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.833

Review 3.  Colorectal malignant polyps: a modern approach.

Authors:  Sofia Saraiva; Isadora Rosa; Ricardo Fonseca; António Dias Pereira
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.