Literature DB >> 31915144

Fusobacterium nucleatum in the Colorectum and Its Association with Cancer Risk and Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Christian Gethings-Behncke1, Helen G Coleman1,2, Haydee W T Jordao1, Daniel B Longley2, Nyree Crawford2, Liam J Murray1, Andrew T Kunzmann3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome, in particular Fusobacterium nucleatum, has been reported to play a role in colorectal cancer development and in patient prognosis. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to assess the prevalence of F. nucleatum in colorectal tumors and evaluate the association between F. nucleatum and colorectal cancer development and prognosis.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies published until January 2019. Random effects meta-analyses were used to assess the prevalence of F. nucleatum in patients with colorectal cancer or tissues relative to controls and survival in F. nucleatum-positive versus -negative patients.
RESULTS: Forty-five relevant articles were identified. Meta-analyses indicated higher odds of F. nucleatum being present in colorectal tissue samples from patients with colorectal cancer [n = 6 studies, pooled OR = 10.06; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 4.48-22.58] and individuals with colorectal polyps (n = 5 studies, pooled OR = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.07-3.16) compared with healthy controls. Similar results were apparent in fecal samples, and when comparing tumor with adjacent normal tissue. Meta-analyses indicated poorer survival in patients with colorectal cancer with high versus low F. nucleatum abundance (n = 5 studies, pooled HR = 1.87; 95% CI, 1.12-3.11).
CONCLUSIONS: A consistent increase in the prevalence and/or abundance of F. nucleatum in colorectal cancer tissue and fecal samples compared with controls was apparent. High abundance of F. nucleatum in colorectal tumors was also associated with poorer overall survival. IMPACT: F. nucleatum could be useful as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for colorectal cancer or as a treatment target. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31915144     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  26 in total

1.  [Changes in the structure of intestinal mucosal flora in colorectal cancer patients].

Authors:  M Hu; K Chen; N Wang; Y Zhao; C Wei; L Meng; Y Tang; Y Teng; H Wang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2022-02-20

2.  Patients with mesenchymal tumours and high Fusobacteriales prevalence have worse prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC).

Authors:  Manuela Salvucci; Nyree Crawford; Katie Stott; Susan Bullman; Daniel B Longley; Jochen H M Prehn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 31.793

3.  Fusobacterium nucleatum and Clinicopathologic Features of Colorectal Cancer: Results From the ColoCare Study.

Authors:  Yannick Eisele; Patrick M Mallea; Biljana Gigic; W Zac Stephens; Christy A Warby; Kate Buhrke; Tengda Lin; Juergen Boehm; Petra Schrotz-King; Sheetal Hardikar; Lyen C Huang; T Bartley Pickron; Courtney L Scaife; Richard Viskochil; Torsten Koelsch; Anita R Peoples; Maria A Pletneva; Mary Bronner; Martin Schneider; Alexis B Ulrich; Eric A Swanson; Adetunji T Toriola; David Shibata; Christopher I Li; Erin M Siegel; Jane Figueiredo; Klaus-Peter Janssen; Hans Hauner; June Round; Cornelia M Ulrich; Andreana N Holowatyj; Jennifer Ose
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 4.  The pathogenic oral-gut-liver axis: new understandings and clinical implications.

Authors:  Jin Imai; Sho Kitamoto; Nobuhiko Kamada
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.124

Review 5.  Airway Microbiota as a Modulator of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Taichiro Goto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  From taxonomy to metabolic output: what factors define gut microbiome health?

Authors:  Tomasz Wilmanski; Noa Rappaport; Christian Diener; Sean M Gibbons; Nathan D Price
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

Review 7.  Catching a glimpse of the bacterial gut community of companion animals: a canine and feline perspective.

Authors:  Giulia Alessandri; Chiara Argentini; Christian Milani; Francesca Turroni; Maria Cristina Ossiprandi; Douwe van Sinderen; Marco Ventura
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 5.813

8.  Fusobacterium nucleatum infection correlates with two types of microsatellite alterations in colorectal cancer and triggers DNA damage.

Authors:  Yoshiki Okita; Minoru Koi; Koki Takeda; Ryan Ross; Bhramar Mukherjee; Erika Koeppe; Elena M Stoffel; Joseph A Galanko; Amber N McCoy; Temitope O Keku; Yoshinaga Okugawa; Takahito Kitajima; Yuji Toiyama; Eric Martens; John M Carethers
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.181

9.  Analysis of differentially expressed genes in oral epithelial cells infected with Fusobacterium nucleatum for revealing genes associated with oral cancer.

Authors:  Shuwei Zhang; Chen Li; Zhiying Zhang; Yuchao Li; Qian Li; Fengxue Geng; Junchao Liu; Yaping Pan
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 5.295

Review 10.  Physical activity, obesity and sedentary behavior in cancer etiology: epidemiologic evidence and biologic mechanisms.

Authors:  Christine M Friedenreich; Charlotte Ryder-Burbidge; Jessica McNeil
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 6.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.