Intestinal Parasites in an Ottoman Period Latrine from Acre (Israel) Dating to the Early 1800s CE.

The aim of this study is to determine the species of parasites that affected the inhabitants of the city of Acre on the coast of the eastern Mediterranean during the Ottoman Period. This is the first archaeological study of parasites in the Ottoman Empire. We analysed sediment from a latrine dating to the early 1800s for the presence of helminth eggs and protozoan parasites which caused dysentery. The samples were examined using light microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. We found evidence for roundworm (Ascaris lumbricoides), whipworm (Trichuris trichiura), fish tapeworm (Dibothriocephalus sp.), Taenia tapeworm (Taenia sp.), lancet liver fluke (Dicrocoelium dendriticum), and the protozoa Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica. The parasite taxa recovered demonstrate the breadth of species present in this coastal city. We consider the effect of Ottoman Period diet, culture, trade and sanitation upon risk of parasitism in this community living 200 years ago.

INTRODUCTION

The coastal city of Acre (or Akko), located in Israel, has a long history, with the earliest evidence for settlement coming from the Bronze Age (3000 BCE). It fell under Ottoman control following the Ottoman-Mamluk War of 1516–1517 [1]. At its height, the Ottoman Empire controlled large parts of south eastern Europe, the Near East, and the coast of North Africa. Acre was historically an important city in the Ottoman Empire until the early 19th century, when Beirut and Haifa were also used as major ports [2]. Combined with decades of conflict starting with the siege of Napoleon in 1799, conquest by Egypt in 1831, and re-conquering of Acre by the Ottomans in 1840, this significantly affected the city’s prosperity in the early 19th century [3].

The Ottoman Empire was quite tolerant with respect to the practise of religion within its boundaries [4]. Even so, the majority of the population living in Acre during this period practised Islam, with a minority practising Christianity and Judaism [5]. Due to Acre’s importance as a port, a substantial amount of trade also occurred there. This trade in animal products could potentially have introduced certain parasites that were not previously endemic to the region. These factors might have impacted the variety of intestinal parasites harboured by the community in Acre.

Intestinal parasites have been found at other archaeological sites in the Middle East in the Roman, Byzantine and medieval periods in regions such as Turkey [6,7], Egypt [8-10], Israel [11-14], Bahrain [15], and Iran [16]. Species identified include roundworm, whipworm, Taenia sp. tapeworm, fish tapeworm, lancet liver fluke, Fasciola liver fluke, pinworm, and the protozoa Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica. However, at most sites only a limited number of these species were present. It is unknown how widespread these species might have been, or which species were most common, within Ottoman culture. In consequence, this study of an Ottoman latrine at Acre has important implications for our understanding of the intestinal diseases of those who lived in the Ottoman Empire.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cesspit was excavated by the Israel Antiquities Authority and is located in the old city of Acre (Fig. 1). It was 1.75 m in diameter at the base, and its opening had been closed off in the past (Fig. 1). The walls of the cesspit were constructed using unhewn stones. It was dated to the early 1800s based upon artefacts found within it, such as clay smoking pipes (Fig. 1, dated by Anastasia Shapiro of the Israel Antiquities Authority). Seven sediment samples were taken from different layers of the cesspit (samples 1–4, 7) and layers found underneath the cesspit floor (samples 5, 6).

Fig. 1

Map showing the location of Acre in the eastern Mediterranean, and the location of the cesspool in the old city (A); cross sectional plan of the cesspit (B); Ottoman pipe dating to the early 1800s, which enables us to date the contents of the cesspool (C).

The samples were analysed in the Ancient Parasites Laboratory at the University of Cambridge. From each sample a 0.2 g subsample was measured out for analysis. This quantity was used because it allows us to view about 20 slides for each sample, and the eggs per gram can be calculated by multiplying each egg count by a factor of 5. This 0.2 g sediment sample was then disaggregated (made into a suspension) using an aqueous solution of 0.5% trisodium phosphate, as per the protocol followed in published studies from our laboratory [6,17,18]. The suspension was then poured through 3 microsieves in sequence, with mesh sizes of 300, 160, and 20 μm, respectively. Intestinal helminth eggs most likely to be found in this region range from approximately 25 μm to 150 μm [19]. Therefore, all of the eggs present in each sample should be trapped on the 20 μm micro-sieve. In order to evaluate the sediment for evidence of protozoa that can cause dysentery, the material in the catchment container below the 20 μm micro-sieve (collected after passage through all 3 microsieves) was analysed using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. This separation is possible due to the small size of Entamoeba histolytica, Cryptosporidium spp., and Giardia duodenalis cysts and preserved antigens, which are all below 20 μm in diameter [19].

The ELISA kits used were the E. histolytica IITM, Giardia IITM, and Cryptosporidium IITM kits produced by TECHLAB® (Blacksburg, Virginia, USA). Samples were analysed twice, on 2 separate days a month apart, and only considered positive if a positive result was present on both tests. A positive and negative control well were used on each ELISA plate, with the positive control being inactive antigen provided with the kits and the negative control being the diluent solution provided with the kits. The absorbance values for each well were measured using a BioTek Synergy HT Multi-Mode Microplate Reader. For the E. histolytica kit, the criterion for positive identification of a sample is an absorbance reading of at least 0.050 more than that of the negative control. For the Giardia and Cryptosporidium ELISA kits, a sample must yield a reading of at least 0.150 in order to be considered positive.

RESULTS

Intestinal helminth eggs were found in each subsample studied, but most samples only contained roundworm (Table 1). However, we will focus on the sediment from the base of the cesspool above the floor (sample 7) and adherent to the wall of the cesspool (sample 2) as they contained the best preserved parasites. Ascaris sp., Trichuris trichiura, Taenia sp. (beef/pork/asiatic tapeworm), Dibothriocephalus sp. (fish tapeworm) and Dicrocoelium dendriticum were found in the sediment analysed (Fig. 2). We have identified the Ascaris sp. as likely human roundworm (Ascaris lumbricoides, and not A. suum), notwithstanding the similarity in morphology between human and pig roundworm, because the eggs were found in a human latrine [20].

Table 1

Parasite taxa found in each sample with mean dimensions, standard deviations and egg concentrations (eggs per gram)

Parasite	Samples positive	Width (μm)	Length (μm)	Eggs/g
Ascaris lumbricoides	All	Mean: 45.8SD: 2.3	Mean: 61.8SD: 4.0	30–355
Trichuris trichiura	2, 7	Mean: 25.7SD: 2.1	Mean: 48.6SD: 2.9	5–25
Taenia sp.	7	32.1	35.4	5
Dibothriocephalus sp.	7	Mean: 39.7	Mean: 65.0	10
Dicrocoelium dendriticum	7	21.5	37.7	5
Entamoeba histolytica	2	-	-	-
Giardia duodenalis	7	-	-	-

Fig. 2

Parasite eggs found in the Ottoman latrine from Acre, Israel. (A) Ascaris lumbricoides egg (dimensions 64×51 μm); (B) Taenia sp. tapeworm egg (dimensions 35×32 μm); (C) Dibothriocephalus sp. egg (dimensions 66×38 μm); (D) Dicrocoelium dendriticum egg (dimensions 38×21 μm); (E) Trichuris trichiura egg (dimensions 52×24 μm). All black scale bars indicate 20 μm.

Regarding protozoan parasites, Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia duodenalis were detected by ELISA. We carried out the ELISA tests twice, one month apart using fresh samples, to minimise the risk of a false positive result. The Entamoeba histolytica ELISA test was positive in sample 2 for 7 out of the 8 wells on the first test, and for one of the 8 wells on the second test. The Giardia duodenalis ELISA test was positive in sample 7 for one of the 8 wells on the first test, and for 2 of the 8 wells on the second test. In both ELISAs, all of the cesspit sediment samples tested negative for Cryptosporidium spp. (Table 2).

Table 2

Positive absorbance readings for the ELISA analysis of samples 2 and 7. Eight subsamples were tested on each occasion

Parasite	Sample 2		Sample 7
	1st test	2nd test	1st test	2nd test
Entamoeba histolytica	0.681	0.088	−ve	not required
	0.460
	0.653
	0.485
	0.152
	0.614
	0.551
Giardia duodenalis	−ve	not required	0.544	0.474
				0.323
Cryptosporidium parvum	−ve	not required	−ve	not required

DISCUSSION

With the discovery of a range of intestinal helminth eggs and protozoa, we can begin to reconstruct a picture of intestinal health in this Ottoman city 200 years ago. The 2 helminth species found most commonly in the latrine sediment were roundworm and whipworm. This is what we would expect considering the previous studies in Israel dating from the Iron Age [21], Roman period [11,14,22], medieval period [13,23], and Mamluk period [18]. The finding of these 2 species in the cesspit sediment indicates that food and/or drinking water would have been contaminated with faeces.

We suspect the Taenia sp. is more likely to represent Taenia saginata (beef tapeworm) than T. solium or T. asiatica, due to the dietary restrictions against pork followed by the Muslims and Jews living in Acre at the time [24-26]. When beef was consumed in Ottoman communities, a common method of preparation was to cure it with salt, and this practise is common even today in Turkey. Cured/salted beef is known as pastirma in Turkish cuisine, and this food was co-opted by the Ottomans from the Byzantine Empire (where it was known as paston) [27]. If the meat was eaten cured but uncooked, this would have spread the parasite and so could explain the presence of Taenia sp. in the cesspit sediment.

Due to the morphological similarity and the extent of overlap in size dimensions between the eggs of Dibothriocephalus latus and Dibothriocephalus dendriticus [28,29], we are unable to make a definitive diagnosis at the species level for the fish tapeworm eggs discovered. Although Dibothriocephalus latus is considered the most common fish tapeworm species worldwide [30], Dibothriocephalus dendriticus has recently been recognised in a variety of recent cases in Europe, prompting conversations about its possible re-emergence as a parasite of humans—or rather an acknowledgement of its prospective impact on humans [31,32]. While Adenocephalus pacificus is a common species of fish tapeworm found in marine fish, it is not found in the Mediterranean region [33]. Therefore, our fish tapeworm eggs are most likely from a species which infects freshwater fish [34]. As fish tapeworm has been found in crusader period latrines in Acre [13], it is possible the parasite became endemic in the region and continued to infect people during the Ottoman period. An alternative scenario is that either travellers from other parts of the Ottoman Empire or Europe were infected elsewhere and then used this latrine when they moved to Acre, or that cured or smoked freshwater fish was brought to Acre by sea and sold, so infecting the local population. Since the Ottomans controlled the Balkans, and since that region is known to have a significant burden of fish tapeworm infection [35], this may have been the source of fish tapeworm transmission in the Ottoman Empire. Indeed, the ruler of Acre from 1776 to 1804, Ahmad al Jazzâr, was born in Bosnia.

Although the prevalence of Dicrocoelium dendriticum in humans appears to be higher in the Near East than other regions across the globe [36], it is unlikely that the egg found is indicative of genuine human infection. Due to the low number of eggs found, it is more likely that someone using the cesspit had eaten the raw or undercooked liver of an infected farm animal, with the eggs passing harmlessly though their intestines. Indeed, a popular dish in Ottoman cuisine was lamb or veal liver, known as Arnavut cigeri or “Albanian liver”, adopted when the Ottomans controlled much of the Balkans [37]. This scenario would be an example of pseudoparasitism, in which the human was not a true definitive host— the person would not have been infected with adult D. dendriticum worms or have experienced any clinical symptoms.

The findings of Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia duodenalis in the latrine samples give further evidence for the level of sanitation and hygiene in this period, as they are spread by the contamination of food and drink by faeces [19]. With microscopic analysis alone E. histolytica is indistinguishable from E. dispar (a non-pathogenic organism), due to the identical nature of these species’ morphology [38]. In contrast, ELISA is able to distinguish these 2 species [39]. In addition, ELISA is more sensitive than light microscopy for the detection of these dysentery-causing protozoa due to their poor preservation in archaeological samples [12,40]. Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia duodenalis have previously been identified in the region in medieval latrines at Acre and a Mamluk period latrine in Jerusalem [12,18]. Drinking water in the Ottoman Empire came from wells, springs and rainwater collected in cisterns, and was transported by aqueducts and cylindrical terracotta pipes. It was common for wastewater to drain into the sewage networks, which led to latrines (located throughout Ottoman cities) or to nearby rivers [41]. The often sophisticated water networks, with separate channels for wastewater and clean water, were made possible by waqfs, or religious endowments [42]. However, with the discovery of these intestinal protozoa in the latrine sediment, it does appear that the Ottoman sewage infrastructure was not sufficient to prevent the population from contracting dysentery.

To conclude, the diversity of parasite species found in this latrine is appreciably higher than most previous studies of past populations of the Middle East region. This may be a consequence of the town’s role in trade, as a coastal city at the border of a large empire. Because of the noticeable lack of past analyses of Ottoman samples, this study helps us to understand the health consequences of the culture, sanitation, diet, and migration patterns within the Ottoman Empire. With our findings of A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, G. duodenalis and E. histolytica, we can infer that hygiene and sanitation infrastructure did not prevent the spread of intestinal diseases in Ottoman Acre. Our findings of Dibothriocephalus sp., Taenia sp., and Dicrocoelium dendriticum, show that foods consumed by the Acre residents may not have always been adequately cooked. In addition, the discovery of Dibothriocephalus sp. might indicate migration from, or trade with, other Ottoman regions such as the Balkans.