Literature DB >> 31914216

Concordance of Lumipulse cerebrospinal fluid t-tau/Aβ42 ratio with amyloid PET status.

June Kaplow1, Manu Vandijck2, Julia Gray3, Michio Kanekiyo1, Els Huyck2, C J Traynham4, Rianne Esquivel4, Anne M Fagan3, Johan Luthman1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers can identify individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology (eg, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles), but defined analyte cut-points using high-throughput automated assays are necessary for general clinical use.
METHODS: CSF amyloid β42 peptide (Aβ42), t-tau, and t-tau/Aβ42 were quantified by the Lumipulse platform in two test cohorts (A/B: Eisai BAN2401-201/MISSION AD E2609-301/302, n = 138; C: Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC), n = 198), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses defined cut-points corresponding best to amyloid determinations using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. The best-performing cut-point was then validated as a predictor of amyloid status in an independent cohort (D: MISSION AD E2609-301/302, n = 240).
RESULTS: Virtually identical t-tau/Aβ42 cut-points (∼0.54) performed best in both test cohorts and with similar accuracy (areas under ROC curve [AUCs] [A/B: 0.95; C: 0.94]). The cut-point yielded an overall percent agreement with amyloid PET of 85.0% in validation cohort D. DISCUSSION: Lumipulse CSF biomarker measures with validated cut-points have clinical utility in identifying AD pathology.
© 2020 the Alzheimer's Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer's disease; Lumipulse; amyloid PET; assay validation; biomarker; cerebrospinal fluid; cut-point; t-tau/Aβ42 ratio

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31914216      PMCID: PMC7061432          DOI: 10.1002/alz.12000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimers Dement        ISSN: 1552-5260            Impact factor:   21.566


  39 in total

1.  Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 in humans.

Authors:  Anne M Fagan; Mark A Mintun; Robert H Mach; Sang-Yoon Lee; Carmen S Dence; Aarti R Shah; Gina N LaRossa; Michael L Spinner; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Steven T DeKosky; John C Morris; David M Holtzman
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  The impact of preanalytical variables on measuring cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: A review.

Authors:  Oskar Hansson; Alvydas Mikulskis; Anne M Fagan; Charlotte Teunissen; Henrik Zetterberg; Hugo Vanderstichele; Jose Luis Molinuevo; Leslie M Shaw; Manu Vandijck; Marcel M Verbeek; Mary Savage; Niklas Mattsson; Piotr Lewczuk; Richard Batrla; Sandra Rutz; Robert A Dean; Kaj Blennow
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer's disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers.

Authors:  Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; William J Jagust; Ronald C Petersen; Michael W Weiner; Paul S Aisen; Leslie M Shaw; Prashanthi Vemuri; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Timothy G Lesnick; Vernon S Pankratz; Michael C Donohue; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  Concordance Between Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers with Alzheimer's Disease Pathology Between Three Independent Assay Platforms.

Authors:  James D Doecke; Alan Rembach; Victor L Villemagne; Shiji Varghese; Stephanie Rainey-Smith; Shannon Sarros; Lisbeth A Evered; Christopher J Fowler; Kelly K Pertile; Rebecca L Rumble; Brett Trounson; Kevin Taddei; Simon M Laws; S Lance Macaulay; Ashley I Bush; Kathryn A Ellis; Ralph Martins; David Ames; Brendan Silbert; Hugo Vanderstichele; Colin L Masters; David G Darby; Qiao-Xin Li; Steven Collins
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 5.  Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: current status and prospects for the future.

Authors:  K Blennow; H Zetterberg
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Partial volume correction in quantitative amyloid imaging.

Authors:  Yi Su; Tyler M Blazey; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle; Daniel S Marcus; Beau M Ances; Randall J Bateman; Nigel J Cairns; Patricia Aldea; Lisa Cash; Jon J Christensen; Karl Friedrichsen; Russ C Hornbeck; Angela M Farrar; Christopher J Owen; Richard Mayeux; Adam M Brickman; William Klunk; Julie C Price; Paul M Thompson; Bernadino Ghetti; Andrew J Saykin; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson; Peter R Schofield; Virginia Buckles; John C Morris; Tammie L S Benzinger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Amyloid Imaging: Poised for Integration into Medical Practice.

Authors:  Keshav Anand; Marwan Sabbagh
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.620

8.  Alzheimer's Disease Normative Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers Validated in PET Amyloid-β Characterized Subjects from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study.

Authors:  Qiao-Xin Li; Victor L Villemagne; James D Doecke; Alan Rembach; Shannon Sarros; Shiji Varghese; Amelia McGlade; Katrina M Laughton; Kelly K Pertile; Christopher J Fowler; Rebecca L Rumble; Brett O Trounson; Kevin Taddei; Stephanie R Rainey-Smith; Simon M Laws; Joanne S Robertson; Lisbeth A Evered; Brendan Silbert; Kathryn A Ellis; Christopher C Rowe; S Lance Macaulay; David Darby; Ralph N Martins; David Ames; Colin L Masters; Steven Collins
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.472

9.  The A4 study: stopping AD before symptoms begin?

Authors:  Reisa A Sperling; Dorene M Rentz; Keith A Johnson; Jason Karlawish; Michael Donohue; David P Salmon; Paul Aisen
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Cerebrospinal fluid analysis detects cerebral amyloid-β accumulation earlier than positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Sebastian Palmqvist; Niklas Mattsson; Oskar Hansson
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Oskar Hansson
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Data-Driven vs Consensus Diagnosis of MCI: Enhanced Sensitivity for Detection of Clinical, Biomarker, and Neuropathologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Emily C Edmonds; Denis S Smirnov; Kelsey R Thomas; Lisa V Graves; Katherine J Bangen; Lisa Delano-Wood; Douglas R Galasko; David P Salmon; Mark W Bondi
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 11.800

3.  CSF Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers: Time-Varying Relationships With MCI Symptom Onset and Associations With Age, Sex, and ApoE4.

Authors:  Barry D Greenberg; Corinne Pettigrew; Anja Soldan; Jiangxia Wang; Mei-Cheng Wang; Jacqueline A Darrow; Marilyn S Albert; Abhay Moghekar
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 11.800

Review 4.  Promising Blood Biomarkers for Clinical Use in Alzheimer's Disease: A Focused Update.

Authors:  Sun Ah Park; Yu Jung Jang; Min Kyoung Kim; Sun Min Lee; So Young Moon
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 5.  Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Philip Scheltens; Bart De Strooper; Miia Kivipelto; Henne Holstege; Gael Chételat; Charlotte E Teunissen; Jeffrey Cummings; Wiesje M van der Flier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Biofluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: Progress, Problems, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Shan Huang; Yan-Jiang Wang; Junhong Guo
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 5.271

7.  Alzheimer's cerebrospinal biomarkers from Lumipulse fully automated immunoassay: concordance with amyloid-beta PET and manual immunoassay in Koreans : CSF AD biomarkers measured by Lumipulse in Koreans.

Authors:  Sohee Moon; Sujin Kim; Sakulrat Mankhong; Seong Hye Choi; Manu Vandijck; Vesna Kostanjevecki; Jee Hyang Jeong; Soo Jin Yoon; Kyung Won Park; Eun-Joo Kim; Bora Yoon; Hee Jin Kim; Jae-Won Jang; Jin Yong Hong; Dong-Ho Park; Leslie M Shaw; Ju-Hee Kang
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 6.982

8.  Comparing CSF amyloid-beta biomarker ratios for two automated immunoassays, Elecsys and Lumipulse, with amyloid PET status.

Authors:  Eline A J Willemse; Betty M Tijms; Bart N M van Berckel; Nathalie Le Bastard; Wiesje M van der Flier; Philip Scheltens; Charlotte E Teunissen
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2021-05-01

9.  Concordance of CSF measures of Alzheimer's pathology with amyloid PET status in a preclinical cohort: A comparison of Lumipulse and established immunoassays.

Authors:  Ashvini Keshavan; Henrietta Wellington; Zhongbo Chen; Ayesha Khatun; Miles Chapman; Melanie Hart; David M Cash; William Coath; Thomas D Parker; Sarah M Buchanan; Sarah E Keuss; Matthew J Harris; Heidi Murray-Smith; Amanda Heslegrave; Nick C Fox; Henrik Zetterberg; Jonathan M Schott
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2020-09-13

10.  Arterial stiffening acts synergistically with APOE genotype and AD biomarker status to influence memory in older adults without dementia.

Authors:  Katherine J Bangen; Denis S Smirnov; Lisa Delano-Wood; Christina E Wierenga; Mark W Bondi; David P Salmon; Douglas Galasko
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.