BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of the hospital discharge destination field ("discharge code" hereafter) for research and payment reform, its accuracy is not well established. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of discharge codes in Medicare claims. DATA SOURCES: 2012-2015 Medicare claims of knee and hip replacement patients. RESEARCH DESIGN: We identified patients' discharge location in claims and compared it with the discharge code. We also used a mixed-effects logistic regression to examine the association of patient and hospital characteristics with discharge code accuracy. RESULTS: Approximately 9% of discharge codes were inaccurate. Long-term care hospital discharge codes had the lowest accuracy rate (41%), followed by acute care transfers (72%), inpatient rehabilitation facility (80%), and home discharges (83%). Most misclassifications occurred within 2 broad groups of postacute care settings: home-based and institutional care. The odds of inaccurate discharge codes were higher for Medicaid-enrolled patients and safety-net and low-volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Inaccurate hospital discharge coding may have introduced bias in studies relying on these codes (eg, evaluations of Medicare bundled payment models). Inaccuracy was more common among Medicaid-enrolled patients and safety-net and low-volume hospitals, suggesting more potential bias in existing study findings pertaining to these patients and hospitals.
BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of the hospital discharge destination field ("discharge code" hereafter) for research and payment reform, its accuracy is not well established. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of discharge codes in Medicare claims. DATA SOURCES: 2012-2015 Medicare claims of knee and hip replacement patients. RESEARCH DESIGN: We identified patients' discharge location in claims and compared it with the discharge code. We also used a mixed-effects logistic regression to examine the association of patient and hospital characteristics with discharge code accuracy. RESULTS: Approximately 9% of discharge codes were inaccurate. Long-term care hospital discharge codes had the lowest accuracy rate (41%), followed by acute care transfers (72%), inpatient rehabilitation facility (80%), and home discharges (83%). Most misclassifications occurred within 2 broad groups of postacute care settings: home-based and institutional care. The odds of inaccurate discharge codes were higher for Medicaid-enrolled patients and safety-net and low-volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Inaccurate hospital discharge coding may have introduced bias in studies relying on these codes (eg, evaluations of Medicare bundled payment models). Inaccuracy was more common among Medicaid-enrolled patients and safety-net and low-volume hospitals, suggesting more potential bias in existing study findings pertaining to these patients and hospitals.
Authors: Richard Iorio; Andrew J Clair; Ifeoma A Inneh; James D Slover; Joseph A Bosco; Joseph D Zuckerman Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Lindsay E Jubelt; Keith S Goldfeld; Wei-yi Chung; Saul B Blecker; Leora I Horwitz Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Anne Deutsch; Carl V Granger; Roger C Fiedler; Gerben DeJong; Robert L Kane; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Allen W Heinemann; John P Naughton; Maurizio Trevisan Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Wenqiang Tian; Gerben DeJong; Susan D Horn; Koen Putman; Ching-Hui Hsieh; Joan E DaVanzo Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: John M Dundon; Joseph Bosco; James Slover; Stephen Yu; Yousuf Sayeed; Richard Iorio Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Karthikeyan E Ponnusamy; Zan Naseer; Mostafa H El Dafrawy; Louis Okafor; Clayton Alexander; Robert S Sterling; Harpal S Khanuja; Richard L Skolasky Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Trudy R Mallinson; Jillian Bateman; Hsiang-Yi Tseng; Larry Manheim; Orit Almagor; Anne Deutsch; Allen W Heinemann Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Michael L Barnett; Andrew Wilcock; J Michael McWilliams; Arnold M Epstein; Karen E Joynt Maddox; E John Orav; David C Grabowski; Ateev Mehrotra Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-01-02 Impact factor: 91.245