PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Early access to rheumatology is imperative to achieve appropriate outcomes in rheumatologic diseases. But there seems to be a significant gap and disparity in the access to rheumatology care between urban and rural areas. This review was undertaken to analyze this issue. RECENT FINDINGS: A significant delay in diagnosis of rheumatic disorder has been correlated to the travel distance to rheumatologist. It is also clear that currently, a significant rheumatology workforce shortage exists and is projected to worsen significantly, thereby making this gap and disparity much bigger. SUMMARY: The scope of this gap and disparity in rheumatology care for rural patients remains incompletely defined and quantified. It is felt to be a significant issue and it is important to invest resources to obtain information about its scope. In addition, a number of solutions already exist which can be implemented using current network and infrastructure. These include relatively low-cost interventions such as patient navigator, remote rheumatology experts and if possible tele-rheumatology. These interventions can assist temporarily but a major improvement will require policy change at federal and state government level as well as involvement, buy-in, and incentivization of the providers and health networks providing rheumatology care.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Early access to rheumatology is imperative to achieve appropriate outcomes in rheumatologic diseases. But there seems to be a significant gap and disparity in the access to rheumatology care between urban and rural areas. This review was undertaken to analyze this issue. RECENT FINDINGS: A significant delay in diagnosis of rheumatic disorder has been correlated to the travel distance to rheumatologist. It is also clear that currently, a significant rheumatology workforce shortage exists and is projected to worsen significantly, thereby making this gap and disparity much bigger. SUMMARY: The scope of this gap and disparity in rheumatology care for rural patients remains incompletely defined and quantified. It is felt to be a significant issue and it is important to invest resources to obtain information about its scope. In addition, a number of solutions already exist which can be implemented using current network and infrastructure. These include relatively low-cost interventions such as patient navigator, remote rheumatology experts and if possible tele-rheumatology. These interventions can assist temporarily but a major improvement will require policy change at federal and state government level as well as involvement, buy-in, and incentivization of the providers and health networks providing rheumatology care.
Authors: Johanna Mucke; Johannes Knitza; Felix Muehlensiepen; Manuel Grahammer; Ramona Stenzel; David Simon; Arnd Kleyer; Gerhard Krönke; Charlotte Sharp; Gerlinde Bendzuck; Marianne Korinth; Corinna Elling-Audersch; Nicolas Vuillerme; Georg Schett; Ann-Christin Pecher; Martin Krusche Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-12-13
Authors: Susan Shenoi; Kristen Hayward; Megan L Curran; Elizabeth Kessler; Jay J Mehta; Meredith P Riebschleger; Helen E Foster Journal: Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 3.054
Authors: Guillermo A Guaracha-Basáñez; Irazú Contreras-Yáñez; Gabriela Hernández-Molina; Viviana A Estrada-González; Lexli D Pacheco-Santiago; Salvador S Valverde-Hernández; José Roberto Galindo-Donaire; Ingris Peláez-Ballestas; Virginia Pascual-Ramos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 3.240