Literature DB >> 31912665

Genome sequencing in persistently unsolved white matter disorders.

Guy Helman1,2, Bryan R Lajoie3, Joanna Crawford2, Asako Takanohashi4, Marzena Walkiewicz1, Egor Dolzhenko3, Andrew M Gross3, Vladimir G Gainullin3, Stephen J Bent5, Emma M Jenkinson6, Sacha Ferdinandusse7, Hans R Waterham7, Imen Dorboz8, Enrico Bertini9,10, Noriko Miyake11, Nicole I Wolf12, Truus E M Abbink12, Susan M Kirwin13, Christina M Tan13, Grace M Hobson13, Long Guo14, Shiro Ikegawa14, Amy Pizzino4, Johanna L Schmidt4, Genevieve Bernard15,16,17, Raphael Schiffmann18, Marjo S van der Knaap12,19, Cas Simons1,2, Ryan J Taft3, Adeline Vanderver4,20.   

Abstract

Genetic white matter disorders have heterogeneous etiologies and overlapping clinical presentations. We performed a study of the diagnostic efficacy of genome sequencing in 41 unsolved cases with prior exome sequencing, resolving an additional 14 from an historical cohort (n = 191). Reanalysis in the context of novel disease-associated genes and improved variant curation and annotation resolved 64% of cases. The remaining diagnoses were directly attributable to genome sequencing, including cases with small and large copy number variants (CNVs) and variants in deep intronic and technically difficult regions. Genome sequencing, in combination with other methodologies, achieved a diagnostic yield of 85% in this retrospective cohort.
© 2020 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of American Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31912665      PMCID: PMC6952322          DOI: 10.1002/acn3.50957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol        ISSN: 2328-9503            Impact factor:   4.511


Introduction

Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) including both targeted gene panels and exome sequencing has become a central component of the diagnostic evaluation of individuals with a neurologic disorder of unknown origin.1, 2 Exome sequencing has shown success in phenotypically diverse cohorts, including the leukodystrophies, a broad class of genetic disorders that affect the white matter of the central nervous system (CNS).2, 3 Leukodystrophies are diverse in origin and highly heterogeneous in presentation and disease course, making diagnosis challenging. Until recently, the probability of obtaining a definitive molecular diagnosis was less than 50% over 5 years2 and despite increases of up to threefold in diagnostic efficacy, many cases remain unsolved. Previously, we reported on a cohort of 191 families with a suspected leukodystrophy, of which 71 were persistently unsolved despite targeted molecular and enzymatic testing and 19 were lost to follow‐up.1 Trio‐or‐greater exome sequencing analysis resolved 42% (30/71) of unsolved cases, which, in combination with standard of care approaches, yielded a 77% overall diagnostic rate from 172 families available for testing. This was a substantial increase over the historical norms,2 but left at least 23% persistently unsolved.1 Genome sequencing has the potential to detect a wide variety of variant types, including single‐nucleotide variants and indels (out‐performing exome sequencing in protein‐coding regions), copy number variants (CNV),4 repeat expansions,5 and detection of pathogenic nonprotein‐coding variation that is missed by other NGS approaches. We pursued genome sequencing on the remaining 41 persistently unsolved families to assess the potential value of genome sequencing diagnostics in a pediatric neurological disease cohort.

Methods

Recruitment

Affected individuals were referred to the Myelin Disorders Bioregistry Project (MDBP) for unsolved leukoencephalopathy of presumed genetic etiology between 1 August 2009 to 31 July 2013, as previously described.1 The study had approval from the institutional review boards at collaborating institutions. Clinical and neuroimaging descriptions are available on request. All individuals had abnormal white matter identified by neuroimaging, suggestive of a leukodystrophy. Symptom onset ranged from birth to 19 years. Ethnicities varied and included individuals of mixed and northern European descent, as well as African American, Arabian, African, Asian, and Latin American origin.1

Genome sequencing and analysis

Genome sequencing was performed at Illumina Inc., San Diego on an Illumina 2000 using 2 x 125 nucleotide paired‐end reads. Dual analyses were run in parallel for each sample. In one, reads were aligned to the reference human genome (GRCh37) using the Burrows‐Wheeler Aligner (BWA) software package and pedigree informed variant calling was performed using the GATK HaplotypeCaller v3.7.6 Variant annotation was performed using SnpEff v4.3m.7 This analysis used a custom variant annotation and interpretation interface to identify possible causal variants. In the other analysis, samples were processed using the Illumina Secondary Analysis Software v5.11.0 (Northstar v5 release), aligned to the reference human genome (GRCh37). Candidate variants were identified using a custom‐built variant interpretation engine. In both analyses, variants were triaged and prioritized by minor allele frequency, conservation, genotype, inheritance, disease‐association, consequence, and predicted pathogenicity. Candidate splice‐altering variants were validated using a minigene splicing assay (Appendix S1).8

Assessment of Variants

Putatively causal variants were assessed as per the American College of Medical Genetics (AGMC) guidelines.9 Cases with variants in known disease genes meeting the ACMG criteria for pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and whose clinical features were concordant with the established gene–disease relationship (including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns) were classified as resolved. Candidate variants in potentially novel disease genes were submitted to GeneMatcher.

Results

Forty‐one families that remained without a molecular etiology after exome sequencing received genome sequencing (Fig. 1A). The mean read depth in probands was 34X and on average, 91% of the genome had coverage depth greater than 20X (Appendix S1). Genome sequencing resulted in a molecular diagnosis for 14 families (34%) (Table 1). Nine diagnoses were achieved through improvements in variant curation or novel disease‐associated genes described since the exome sequencing analysis. Five diagnoses were achieved through identification of CNVs (three cases), deep intronic variants (one case), and variants in technically difficult regions (one case). One case was considered clinically resolved following multidisciplinary review.
Figure 1

Myelin Disorders Bioregistry Project Unsolved Cohort and Challenging Variants in Known Leukodystrophy Genes. (A) The initial “unsolved” cohort consisted of 191 families. 101 were diagnosed by standard of care (SoC) methodologies, 71 of the remaining families underwent exome sequencing, while 19 were excluded due to lack of DNA or inability to access the family trio for NGS testing. The genome sequencing cohort consisted of 41 families, 14 of which were solved. (B) Variants in GJC2 (OMIM:608803) were identified in LD_0617 and are causative of Pelizaeus‐Merzbacher‐like disease (OMIM:608804). The 13bp paternally inherited duplication, c.916_928dupGCCTCCGCCCCCG, p.Ala310fs in GJC2, was previously undetected by exome sequencing due to a lack of coverage in this region.1 (C) The duplication lies in the middle of a 110 nucleotide block of a ~ 95% GC‐rich region and was identified in the affected individual and father on genome sequencing, where it is indicated by a green rectangle. (D) Sanger chromatogram confirming the presence of the c.916_928dupGCCTCCGCCCCCG variant in the LD_0617 proband. The duplicated sequence is indicated in red with the second copy in LD_0617 bold and underlined.

Table 1

Clinically significant single‐nucleotide, indel, and copy number variants.

Family IDGenderCurrent AgeAge at Initial MRIGeneZygosityVariant (GRCh37) & Transcript IDcDNAProteinrsIDgnomAD AF1 Max AF2

SIFT/ Mutation

Taster3

Variant ClassificationACMG Criteria4
Novel Gene (n = 4)
LD_0246M8 Y11 M H3F3B

Het.,

de novo

17‐73774722‐G‐C

ENST00000254810

c.365C> GPro122ArgN/A0.00000.0000N/A/ DCPathogenicPS2, PM2, PP3
LD_0500M6 Y23 M AIFM1

Hemi.,

de novo

X‐129274569‐G‐A

ENST00000287295

c.720C> TAsp240AspN/A0.00000.0000N/A/ N/APathogenicPS2, PS3, PM2
LD_0527M8 YUNK NKX6‐2 Hom.

10‐134598648‐C‐TA

ENST00000368592

c.606delGinsTALys202fsN/A0.00000.0000N/A/ N/ALikely pathogenicPVS1, PM2
LD_0807F17 Y12 Y SNORD118 Het. (m)

17‐8076848‐A‐C

ENST00000363593

n.58 T> GN/AN/A0.00000.0000N/A/ N/AVUSPM2, PM3, PP4, BP6
Het. (p)

17‐8076762‐G‐A

ENST00000363593

n. *9C> TN/AN/A0.0019070.001907N/A/ N/AVUSPM2, PM3, PP4, BP6
Intronic (n = 1)
LD_0393F (3) & M (1)N/AN/A CSF1R Hom.

5‐149440309‐CT‐

ENST00000286301

c.1969 + 115_1969+116delAG5 Pro658Serfs*24N/A0.00000.0000N/A/ N/ALikely pathogenicPS3, PM2, PP1
MT‐DNA (n = 1)
LD_0725F21 Y1 Y MT‐TL1 Het. (m)

MT‐3243‐A‐G

ENST00000386347

n.14A> GN/Ars199474657N/AN/AN/A/ N/APathogenicPS1, PS3, PP3, PP4
Challenging Variants (n = 2)
LD_0315M7 Y19 M DARS2 Het. (p)

1‐173797450‐T‐CC

ENST00000361951

c.228‐21delTinsCCN/Ars5287729840.0000210.002N/A/ N/ALikely pathogenicPS3, PM1
Het. (m)

1‐173797537‐G‐T

ENST00000361951

c.294G>T6 Glu98AspN/A0.00000.0000T/ DCLikely pathogenicPS3, PM2, PP2, PP3
LD_0617F7 Y2 Y GJC2 Het. (p)

1‐228346388‐C‐GCCTCCGCCCCCG

ENST00000366714

c.916_928dupGCCTCCGCCCCCGAla310fsN/A0.00000.0000N/A/ N/APathogenicPVS1, PM2, PP4
Het. (m)

1‐ 228345662‐A‐G

ENST00000366714

c.203A> GTyr68Cysrs10317206540.00000.0000D/ DCLikely pathogenicPM2, PM3, PP3, PP4
Improved Pipeline/ Separate study novel gene (n = 4)
LD_0162M & MDeceased3 Y HIKESHI Hom.

11‐86017416‐G‐C

ENST0000027843

c.160G> CVal54Leurs2020037950.00012990.0002D/ DCLikely pathogenicPS1, PM1, PP1, PP4, PP5
LD_0579M5 Y5 M L1CAM Hemi. (m)

X‐153135278‐A‐T

ENST00000264161

c.1103T> AIle368AsnN/A0.00000.0000D/ DCLikely pathogenicPM1, PM2, PP2, PP3
LD_0808M6 Y18 M SPATA5 Het. (p)

4‐123855300‐G‐A

ENST00000274008

c.554G> AGly185Glurs7535875180.00002530.0002D/ DCLikely pathogenicPM2,PM3, PP2, PP3, PP4
Het. (m)

4‐123949348‐G‐C

ENST00000274008

c.1877G> CTrp626Serrs3753437530.00001220.0000D/ DCLikely pathogenicPM2, PM5, PP3, PP4, PP5
Clinically Resolved
LD_0587M9 Y9 M KDM5C Hemi. (m)

X‐53226186‐C‐A

ENST00000375401

c.2663G> TArg888Leurs3758508720.00001440.0001D/ PVUSPM2, PP3

Key: M – Month; Y – Years; UNK – Unknown; MT– mitochondrial; Het. – heterozygous; Hemi. – Hemizygous; Hom. ‐ Homozygous; N/A – Not available; AF – allele frequency.

Total allele frequency in Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) dataset.

Maximum reported allele frequency for any single subpopulation represented in ExAC, 1000 Genomes, or Exome Variant Server datasets.

DC – Disease‐Causing; DA – Disease‐Causing Automatic; D – Damaging; T – Tolerated

ACMG criteria upon which classification is based

Variant shown in Guo et al. 2019 to result in inclusion of a novel 99nt pseudo‐exon, with an in‐frame stop codon p.(P658Sfs*24) resulting in nonsense‐mediated decay.

Variant shown to result in DARS2 Exon 3 skipping. See Appendix S1.

Myelin Disorders Bioregistry Project Unsolved Cohort and Challenging Variants in Known Leukodystrophy Genes. (A) The initial “unsolved” cohort consisted of 191 families. 101 were diagnosed by standard of care (SoC) methodologies, 71 of the remaining families underwent exome sequencing, while 19 were excluded due to lack of DNA or inability to access the family trio for NGS testing. The genome sequencing cohort consisted of 41 families, 14 of which were solved. (B) Variants in GJC2 (OMIM:608803) were identified in LD_0617 and are causative of Pelizaeus‐Merzbacher‐like disease (OMIM:608804). The 13bp paternally inherited duplication, c.916_928dupGCCTCCGCCCCCG, p.Ala310fs in GJC2, was previously undetected by exome sequencing due to a lack of coverage in this region.1 (C) The duplication lies in the middle of a 110 nucleotide block of a ~ 95% GC‐rich region and was identified in the affected individual and father on genome sequencing, where it is indicated by a green rectangle. (D) Sanger chromatogram confirming the presence of the c.916_928dupGCCTCCGCCCCCG variant in the LD_0617 proband. The duplicated sequence is indicated in red with the second copy in LD_0617 bold and underlined. Clinically significant single‐nucleotide, indel, and copy number variants. SIFT/ Mutation Taster3 Het., de novo 17‐73774722‐G‐C ENST00000254810 Hemi., de novo X‐129274569‐G‐A ENST00000287295 10‐134598648‐C‐TA ENST00000368592 17‐8076848‐A‐C ENST00000363593 17‐8076762‐G‐A ENST00000363593 5‐149440309‐CT‐ ENST00000286301 MT‐3243‐A‐G ENST00000386347 1‐173797450‐T‐CC ENST00000361951 1‐173797537‐G‐T ENST00000361951 1‐228346388‐C‐GCCTCCGCCCCCG ENST00000366714 1‐ 228345662‐A‐G ENST00000366714 11‐86017416‐G‐C ENST0000027843 X‐153135278‐A‐T ENST00000264161 4‐123855300‐G‐A ENST00000274008 4‐123949348‐G‐C ENST00000274008 X‐53226186‐C‐A ENST00000375401 Chr10:27500219‐27507820 Precise breakpoints as determined by Sanger: c.626‐689_937‐235delins936 + 1075_936+1230inv Key: M – Month; Y – Years; UNK – Unknown; MT– mitochondrial; Het. – heterozygous; Hemi. – Hemizygous; Hom. ‐ Homozygous; N/A – Not available; AF – allele frequency. Total allele frequency in Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) dataset. Maximum reported allele frequency for any single subpopulation represented in ExAC, 1000 Genomes, or Exome Variant Server datasets. DC – Disease‐Causing; DA – Disease‐Causing Automatic; D – Damaging; T – Tolerated ACMG criteria upon which classification is based Variant shown in Guo et al. 2019 to result in inclusion of a novel 99nt pseudo‐exon, with an in‐frame stop codon p.(P658Sfs*24) resulting in nonsense‐mediated decay. Variant shown to result in DARS2 Exon 3 skipping. See Appendix S1. Since our initial study, more than 1,200 new gene–disease relationships have been described, and studies have shown increases of up to 10% in diagnostic yield with reanalysis within 24–36 months.10 Reanalysis in the context of recently published literature (and associated annotation pipelines) allowed resolution of an additional eight cases. These included a de novo missense variant in H3F3B (OMIM:601058) (LD_0246), 11 a hemizygous, synonymous variant in AIFM1 (OMIM:300169) (LD_0500),12 and biallelic variants in HIKESHI (OMIM:614908) (LD_0162),13 NKX6‐2 (OMIM:605955) (LD_0527), 14 and SPATA5 (OMIM:613940) (LD_0808),15 all previously associated with prominent white matter disease in multiple affected individuals. Affected individuals in families LD_0579 and LD_0587 had variants in genes previously implicated in neurologic syndromes where improvements to our analysis pipeline or improved phenotypic understand permitted a diagnosis or prioritized a high confidence candidate, in L1CAM (OMIM:308840)16 and KDM5C (OMIM:314690),17 respectively. White matter abnormalities are a rare association with L1CAM‐related disorder.16 LD_0587 has a clinical presentation with intellectual disability, epilepsy, aggressive behavior, and macrocephaly, all consistent features of KDM5C‐related disorder and is classified as clinically resolved but the identified variant lacks definitive proof to be classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic.17 This case was not included in overall numbers of definitively resolved cases as this variant remains a variant of uncertain significance per the ACMG criteria. Finally, causal nonprotein‐coding variants were identified in SNORD118 (OMIM:616663), confirming a clinical diagnosis of leukoencephalopathy with calcifications and cysts (OMIM:614561) in LD_0807.18 SNORD118 variants were found as part of a targeted cohort study and concomitantly found in our genome sequencing cohort.18 In two individuals, genome sequencing revealed variants not identified on exome sequencing analysis due to lack of variant annotation or stringent filtering. For LD_0725, genome sequencing revealed a mitochondrial DNA variant, m.3243A>G in MT‐TL1 (OMIM:590050), carried on 42% of reads in the affected individual and 15% of the maternal reads. This variant has been previously associated with mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke‐like episodes (MELAS [OMIM:540000]). LD_0315 had biallelic variants in DARS2 (OMIM:610956), associated with leukoencephalopathy with brainstem and spinal cord involvement and lactate elevation (LBSL [OMIM:611105]). An intronic variant, c.228‐21delTinsCC, p.(Arg76Serfs*5) that has been shown to affect mRNA splicing of DARS2 with skipping of exon 319 was found in trans with a previously unreported missense variant, c.294G>T, p.(Glu98Asp). Stringent variant filtering performed during the prior exome sequencing analysis excluded this intronic variant and precluded a diagnosis.1 To confirm the predicted splicing change of intronic and exonic variants based on SpliceAI annotations,20 we generated a minigene splicing reporter assay (Appendix S1), demonstrating each variant results in the skipping of exon 3 (Appendix S1). The remaining five cases were resolved due to the identification of variants not typically identifiable by exome sequencing. The first is related to a region that is technically difficult to assess. Biallelic variants were identified in LD_0617 in GJC2 (OMIM:608803), causative of Pelizaeus‐Merzbacher‐like disease (PMLD [OMIM:608804]), a maternally inherited missense variant c.203A>G, p.(Tyr68Cys), and a 13 base paternally inherited duplication c.916_928dupGCCTCCGCCCCCG, p.(Ala310fs). The duplication was previously undetected by exome sequencing due to a lack of coverage as it lies in the middle of a 110 nucleotide block of a ~ 95% GC‐rich region (Fig. 1B).1 The c.916_928dupGCCTCCGCCCCCG GJC2 variant called by genome sequencing was supported by six of 19 genome sequencing reads covering the position (Fig. 1C), and was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1D). In family LD_0393, genome sequencing revealed a homozygous intronic variant, c.1969+115_1969+116delAG in CSF1R (OMIM:164770). Heterozygous CSF1R variants are associated with another leukodystrophy, hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with spheroids (OMIM:221820). This biallelic variant affects a cryptic splice site and results in the inclusion of a novel 99nt pseudo‐exon, with an in‐frame stop codon p.(Pro658Serfs*24) resulting in nonsense‐mediated decay of the truncated protein. These individuals were found to have a novel syndrome due to biallelic variants in CSF1R characterized by brain malformation and skeletal dysplasia, reported in Guo et al. (2019).21 Genome sequencing CNV analysis provided a diagnosis in three affected individuals (Table 1). LD_0498 was found to have impaired peroxisomal β‐oxidation of C26:0 and genome sequencing revealed a homozygous, 7.5kb deletion in ACBD5 (OMIM:616618) causing loss of exons 7 and 8, confirmed by Sanger sequencing.22 LD_0594 was found to have an X‐linked 396kb duplication covering ARX (OMIM: 300382), previously associated with a broad spectrum of neuroimaging abnormalities and early infantile epileptic encephalopathy (OMIM:308350). LD_0671 was found to harbor a 21kb de novo deletion encompassing a region in chromosome 2 covering SATB2 (OMIM:608148), previously associated with Glass syndrome (OMIM:612313).23

Discussion

Of the original 191 families examined in this cohort, 101 received a definitive diagnosis using enzymatic, biochemical, or single gene molecular approaches (53%). Nineteen families were subsequently lost to follow‐up, leaving 71 families able to be tested by NGS. Thirty cases were solved by exome sequencing,1 and in this study, genome sequencing established a diagnosis in an additional 14 families yielding a 20% improvement, and an overall diagnostic efficacy of NGS of genome or exome sequencing increased to 44/71 (62%) and in total resolution of 145/172 (84%) of the original testable cohort. Reanalysis by genome sequencing also led to the identification of variants in recently described disease genes AIFM1,12 HIKESHI, 13 H3F3B, 11 NKX6‐2, 14 and SPATA5, 15 and genes missed in the previous analysis (L1CAM). This is consistent with multiple recent studies that have shown increases of up to 10% in diagnostic yield with reanalysis within 24–36 months.10 Improvements in variant annotation and filtering detected variants in mitochondrial DNA and intronic regions proximal to captured exons. It is expected that these would have been identified on exome sequencing if performed with current testing modalities. Genome sequencing findings improved the overall diagnostic yield in this cohort by ~11% (5/44 cases solved by NGS), through the detection of variants in GC‐rich regions, deep intronic variants, and CNVs. As sequencing assays and associated informatic pipelines improve, some of these variant types may be detected by exome sequencing. In our exome analysis, however, these variants were not found due to limitations of either sequencing or analysis, some of which will be difficult to overcome due to limitations of the assay (e.g. GC‐rich regions) or the ability of exome to accurately detect large genomic alterations in single cases. Our study lends support to a previous study that suggested that currently up to 80% of white matter disorders may be able to be solved.2 Notably, no recurring diagnoses were made in the current cohort of n = 41, and only a minority across all tiers of NGS testing (20%) were associated with canonical leukodystrophy genes. These data indicate that only a fraction of affected individuals would achieve a diagnosis using targeted testing approaches, including panels of classically defined leukodystrophy genes now in widespread use. An established diagnostic workflow for laboratory and genetic testing in combination with MRI pattern recognition24 suggests that if initial biochemical and enzymatic testing is not confirmatory and if the MRI does not fit an established leukodystrophy, broad‐based NGS testing should be implemented. Our data support this approach, favoring genome sequencing over exome sequencing.

Conflict of Interest

BRL, ED, AG, VG, and RJT are/were employees of Illumina, Inc. Nemours receives revenue from diagnostic testing performed in the Nemours Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory. GB has received compensation for traveling to meetings and advisory boards from Ionis, Shire/Takeda, Actelion Pharmaceuticals and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. She served on the scientific advisory board for Ionis (2019) and has received research grants from Shire/Takeda and Bluebird Bio. AV receives support from Shire, Gilead, Eli Lilly and Illumina for research activities. Otherwise the authors report no conflict of interest.

Author Contributions

GH, BRL, CS, RJT, and AV designed and managed the project and wrote the manuscript. JC, AT, MW, EMJ, YJC, SF, HRW, ID, EB, NM, NIW, TEMA, SMK, CT, GMH, LG, and SI provided functional analysis of variants and confirmation of variants and contributed to figures. BRL, SJB, CS, and RJT contributed bioinformatics expertise. GH, BRL, AP, JLS, GB, RS, MSvdK, GB, CS, RJT, and AV performed analysis of or provided consultation for cases from the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. Appendix S1. A supplemental text PDF file is provided which includes methods and results for the minigene splicing reporter assay used in the case of LD_0315 (Section 1) and sequencing coverage achieved for proband samples (Table S2). Case reports are for each of the 41 families with diagnoses associated with single‐nucleotide variants and small insertion‐deletion events (Section 2), copy number variants (Section 3), or remaining unsolved after genome sequencing and analysis (Section 3). The supplemental text of the original study can be found at: https://imb.uq.edu.au/download/Vanderver_AON_2016.case_reports.pdf Click here for additional data file.
  24 in total

1.  A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3.

Authors:  Pablo Cingolani; Adrian Platts; Le Lily Wang; Melissa Coon; Tung Nguyen; Luan Wang; Susan J Land; Xiangyi Lu; Douglas M Ruden
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.160

2.  ACBD5 deficiency causes a defect in peroxisomal very long-chain fatty acid metabolism.

Authors:  Sacha Ferdinandusse; Kim D Falkenberg; Janet Koster; Petra A Mooyer; Richard Jones; Carlo W T van Roermund; Amy Pizzino; Michael Schrader; Ronald J A Wanders; Adeline Vanderver; Hans R Waterham
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Bi-allelic CSF1R Mutations Cause Skeletal Dysplasia of Dysosteosclerosis-Pyle Disease Spectrum and Degenerative Encephalopathy with Brain Malformation.

Authors:  Long Guo; Débora Romeo Bertola; Asako Takanohashi; Asuka Saito; Yuko Segawa; Takanori Yokota; Satoru Ishibashi; Yoichiro Nishida; Guilherme Lopes Yamamoto; José Francisco da Silva Franco; Rachel Sayuri Honjo; Chong Ae Kim; Camila Manso Musso; Margaret Timmons; Amy Pizzino; Ryan J Taft; Bryan Lajoie; Melanie A Knight; Kenneth H Fischbeck; Andrew B Singleton; Carlos R Ferreira; Zheng Wang; Li Yan; James Y Garbern; Pelin O Simsek-Kiper; Hirofumi Ohashi; Pamela G Robey; Alan Boyde; Naomichi Matsumoto; Noriko Miyake; Jürgen Spranger; Raphael Schiffmann; Adeline Vanderver; Gen Nishimura; Maria Rita Dos Santos Passos-Bueno; Cas Simons; Kinya Ishikawa; Shiro Ikegawa
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  A clinical approach to the diagnosis of patients with leukodystrophies and genetic leukoencephelopathies.

Authors:  Sumit Parikh; Geneviève Bernard; Marc C Patterson; Ryan J Taft; Adeline Vanderver; Richard J Leventer; Marjo S van der Knaap; Johan van Hove; Amy Pizzino; Nathan H McNeill; Guy Helman; Cas Simons; Johanna L Schmidt; William B Rizzo
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.797

5.  Biallelic mutations in the homeodomain of NKX6-2 underlie a severe hypomyelinating leukodystrophy.

Authors:  Imen Dorboz; Chiara Aiello; Cas Simons; Robert Thompson Stone; Marcello Niceta; Monique Elmaleh; Mohammad Abuawad; Diane Doummar; Alessandro Bruselles; Nicole I Wolf; Lorena Travaglini; Odile Boespflug-Tanguy; Marco Tartaglia; Adeline Vanderver; Diana Rodriguez; Enrico Bertini
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Predicting Splicing from Primary Sequence with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Kishore Jaganathan; Sofia Kyriazopoulou Panagiotopoulou; Jeremy F McRae; Siavash Fazel Darbandi; David Knowles; Yang I Li; Jack A Kosmicki; Juan Arbelaez; Wenwu Cui; Grace B Schwartz; Eric D Chow; Efstathios Kanterakis; Hong Gao; Amirali Kia; Serafim Batzoglou; Stephan J Sanders; Kyle Kai-How Farh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Leukodystrophies: a proposed classification system based on pathological changes and pathogenetic mechanisms.

Authors:  Marjo S van der Knaap; Marianna Bugiani
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 17.088

9.  Altered Gene-Regulatory Function of KDM5C by a Novel Mutation Associated With Autism and Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Christina N Vallianatos; Clara Farrehi; Michael J Friez; Margit Burmeister; Catherine E Keegan; Shigeki Iwase
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 5.639

10.  Detection of long repeat expansions from PCR-free whole-genome sequence data.

Authors:  Egor Dolzhenko; Joke J F A van Vugt; Richard J Shaw; Mitchell A Bekritsky; Marka van Blitterswijk; Giuseppe Narzisi; Subramanian S Ajay; Vani Rajan; Bryan R Lajoie; Nathan H Johnson; Zoya Kingsbury; Sean J Humphray; Raymond D Schellevis; William J Brands; Matt Baker; Rosa Rademakers; Maarten Kooyman; Gijs H P Tazelaar; Michael A van Es; Russell McLaughlin; William Sproviero; Aleksey Shatunov; Ashley Jones; Ahmad Al Khleifat; Alan Pittman; Sarah Morgan; Orla Hardiman; Ammar Al-Chalabi; Chris Shaw; Bradley Smith; Edmund J Neo; Karen Morrison; Pamela J Shaw; Catherine Reeves; Lara Winterkorn; Nancy S Wexler; David E Housman; Christopher W Ng; Alina L Li; Ryan J Taft; Leonard H van den Berg; David R Bentley; Jan H Veldink; Michael A Eberle
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 9.438

View more
  13 in total

1.  De novo mutations in TOMM70, a receptor of the mitochondrial import translocase, cause neurological impairment.

Authors:  Debdeep Dutta; Lauren C Briere; Oguz Kanca; Paul C Marcogliese; Melissa A Walker; Frances A High; Adeline Vanderver; Joel Krier; Nikkola Carmichael; Christine Callahan; Ryan J Taft; Cas Simons; Guy Helman; Undiagnosed Diseases Network; Michael F Wangler; Shinya Yamamoto; David A Sweetser; Hugo J Bellen
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Reanalysis of exome negative patients with rare disease: a pragmatic workflow for diagnostic applications.

Authors:  Gaby Schobers; Jolanda H Schieving; Michèl A A P Willemsen; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Helger G Yntema; Maartje Pennings; Rolph Pfundt; Ronny Derks; Tom Hofste; Ilse de Wijs; Nienke Wieskamp; Simone van den Heuvel; Jordi Corominas Galbany; Christian Gilissen; Marcel Nelen; Han G Brunner; Tjitske Kleefstra; Erik-Jan Kamsteeg
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 15.266

Review 3.  Hypomyelinating leukodystrophies - unravelling myelin biology.

Authors:  Nicole I Wolf; Charles Ffrench-Constant; Marjo S van der Knaap
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  Progressive Early-Onset Leukodystrophy Related to Biallelic Variants in the KARS Gene: The First Case Described in Latin America.

Authors:  Adriana Vargas; Jorge Rojas; Ivan Aivasovsky; Sergio Vergara; Marianna Castellanos; Carolina Prieto; Luis Celis
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Genetic testing of leukodystrophies unraveling extensive heterogeneity in a large cohort and report of five common diseases and 38 novel variants.

Authors:  Nejat Mahdieh; Mahdieh Soveizi; Ali Reza Tavasoli; Ali Rabbani; Mahmoud Reza Ashrafi; Alfried Kohlschütter; Bahareh Rabbani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Genome sequencing identifies three molecular diagnoses including a mosaic variant in the COL2A1 gene in an individual with Pol III-related leukodystrophy and Feingold syndrome.

Authors:  Kayla J Muirhead; Amanda R Clause; Zinayida Schlachetzki; Holly Dubbs; Denise L Perry; R Tanner Hagelstrom; Ryan J Taft; Adeline Vanderver
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2021-12-09

7.  Clinical and genetic spectrum of 104 Indian families with central nervous system white matter abnormalities.

Authors:  Parneet Kaur; Michelle C do Rosario; Malavika Hebbar; Suvasini Sharma; Neethukrishna Kausthubham; Karthik Nair; Shrikiran A; Ramesh Bhat Y; Leslie Edward S Lewis; Sheela Nampoothiri; Siddaramappa J Patil; Narayanaswami Suresh; Sunita Bijarnia Mahay; Ratna Dua Puri; Shivanand Pai; Anupriya Kaur; Rakshith Kc; Nutan Kamath; Shruti Bajaj; Ali Kumble; Rajesh Shetty; Rathika Shenoy; Mahesh Kamate; Hitesh Shah; Mamta N Muranjan; Yatheesha Bl; K Shreedhara Avabratha; Girish Subramaniam; Rajagopal Kadavigere; Stephanie Bielas; Katta Mohan Girisha; Anju Shukla
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Further Delineation of the Clinical and Pathologic Features of HIKESHI-Related Hypomyelinating Leukodystrophy.

Authors:  Guy Helman; Ayelet Zerem; Akshata Almad; Julia L Hacker; Sarah Woidill; Sunetra Sase; Alexandra N LeFevre; Josef Ekstein; Martin M Johansson; Chloe A Stutterd; Ryan J Taft; Cas Simons; Judith B Grinspan; Amy Pizzino; Johanna L Schmidt; Brian Harding; Yoel Hirsch; Angela N Viaene; Aviva Fattal-Valevski; Adeline Vanderver
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.210

Review 9.  Modeling CSF-1 receptor deficiency diseases - how close are we?

Authors:  Violeta Chitu; Şölen Gökhan; E Richard Stanley
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.622

10.  Deep clinicopathological phenotyping identifies a previously unrecognized pathogenic EMD splice variant.

Authors:  Daniel G Calame; Jawid M Fatih; Isabella Herman; Zeynep Coban-Akdemir; Haowei Du; Tadahiro Mitani; Shalini N Jhangiani; Dana Marafi; Richard A Gibbs; Jennifer E Posey; Vidya P Mehta; Carrie A Mohila; Farida Abid; Timothy E Lotze; Davut Pehlivan; Adekunle M Adesina; James R Lupski
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.511

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.