Lucas M Kimmig1, Chuanhong Liao2, Remzi Bag3,4. 1. Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. 3. Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. rbag@bsd.uchicago.edu. 4. Biological Sciences Division, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. rbag@bsd.uchicago.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The intravenous or subcutaneous delivery of prostanoid drugs for moderate to severe pulmonary arterial hypertension has been fraught with complications and patient dissatisfaction. Combination therapy including inhaled treprostinil is an attractive alternative in clinically stable patients. Uncertainties exist about the patient characteristics and the optimal setting (inpatient versus office/home) for transition. METHODS: Sixteen stable patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and favorable risk profile were transitioned from parenteral prostanoid to combination therapy including inhaled treprostinil in the home setting. Nine patients were using intravenous treprostinil, two patients were using subcutaneous treprostinil, and five patients were using intravenous epoprostenol at a median dose of 80 (interquartile range, IQR 72-90), 76.5 (68 and 85), and 28 (IQR 26-30) ng/kg/min respectively. Patients were followed up for a median of 732.5 days after transition (IQR 506.5-1294 days). RESULTS: Patients tolerated the transition to inhaled treprostinil well without significant change in functional class (81.25% FC I/II before transition vs. 87.5% after), 6-min walk distance [349 m (IQR 226-461 m) to 364 m (IQR 238-565 m), p = 0.09] or NT-proBNP [149 pg/ml (IQR 71.5-383 pg/ml) to 186.5 pg/ml (IQR 83.5-444 pg/ml), p = 0.38]. Hemodynamic data, where available, showed significant improvements in mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance from 36 mmHg (IQR 27-46.5 mmHg) and 5.2 Wood Units (WU) (IQR 3.1-5.6 WU) to 28.5 mmHg (IQR 22-35.5 mmHg) and 3.2 WU (IQR 2.4-4.2 WU) (p-values 0.022 and 0.003). More patients were on triple therapy after transition, and side effects reported were less severe. CONCLUSION: For select patients, transition from a parenteral prostanoid-based therapy to a combination regimen including inhaled treprostinil in the home setting appears safe and well tolerated.
PURPOSE: The intravenous or subcutaneous delivery of prostanoid drugs for moderate to severe pulmonary arterial hypertension has been fraught with complications and patient dissatisfaction. Combination therapy including inhaled treprostinil is an attractive alternative in clinically stable patients. Uncertainties exist about the patient characteristics and the optimal setting (inpatient versus office/home) for transition. METHODS: Sixteen stable patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and favorable risk profile were transitioned from parenteral prostanoid to combination therapy including inhaled treprostinil in the home setting. Nine patients were using intravenous treprostinil, two patients were using subcutaneous treprostinil, and five patients were using intravenous epoprostenol at a median dose of 80 (interquartile range, IQR 72-90), 76.5 (68 and 85), and 28 (IQR 26-30) ng/kg/min respectively. Patients were followed up for a median of 732.5 days after transition (IQR 506.5-1294 days). RESULTS: Patients tolerated the transition to inhaled treprostinil well without significant change in functional class (81.25% FC I/II before transition vs. 87.5% after), 6-min walk distance [349 m (IQR 226-461 m) to 364 m (IQR 238-565 m), p = 0.09] or NT-proBNP [149 pg/ml (IQR 71.5-383 pg/ml) to 186.5 pg/ml (IQR 83.5-444 pg/ml), p = 0.38]. Hemodynamic data, where available, showed significant improvements in mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance from 36 mmHg (IQR 27-46.5 mmHg) and 5.2 Wood Units (WU) (IQR 3.1-5.6 WU) to 28.5 mmHg (IQR 22-35.5 mmHg) and 3.2 WU (IQR 2.4-4.2 WU) (p-values 0.022 and 0.003). More patients were on triple therapy after transition, and side effects reported were less severe. CONCLUSION: For select patients, transition from a parenteral prostanoid-based therapy to a combination regimen including inhaled treprostinil in the home setting appears safe and well tolerated.
Authors: Darren B Taichman; Joe Ornelas; Lorinda Chung; James R Klinger; Sandra Lewis; Jess Mandel; Harold I Palevsky; Stuart Rich; Namita Sood; Erika B Rosenzweig; Terence K Trow; Rex Yung; C Gregory Elliott; David B Badesch Journal: Chest Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Antonio Roman; Joan A Barberà; Pilar Escribano; Maria L Sala; Laia Febrer; Itziar Oyagüez; Eliazar Sabater; Miguel A Casado Journal: Appl Health Econ Health Policy Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 2.561
Authors: Nazzareno Galiè; Marc Humbert; Jean-Luc Vachiery; Simon Gibbs; Irene Lang; Adam Torbicki; Gérald Simonneau; Andrew Peacock; Anton Vonk Noordegraaf; Maurice Beghetti; Ardeschir Ghofrani; Miguel Angel Gomez Sanchez; Georg Hansmann; Walter Klepetko; Patrizio Lancellotti; Marco Matucci; Theresa McDonagh; Luc A Pierard; Pedro T Trindade; Maurizio Zompatori; Marius Hoeper Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Amresh Raina; James C Coons; Manreet Kanwar; Srinivas Murali; George Sokos; Raymond L Benza Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.017