Literature DB >> 31912371

Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain: a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial.

Khaled Taha1, R Scott Conley2, Praveen Arany3, Stephen Warunek4, Thikriat Al-Jewair5.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical vibratory stimulation on maxillary canine retraction and pain perception in adolescents undergoing full-fixed orthodontic treatment with extraction. A pilot randomized-controlled clinical trial was conducted in one university orthodontic clinic. Twenty-one healthy adolescents who underwent full-fixed orthodontic treatment with maxillary first-premolar extraction were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to the experimental group (N = 10) that used a mechanical vibration device (AcceleDent Aura, OrthoAccel Technologies, Inc.) or the control group (N = 11) that did not receive a vibration device. The evaluation timepoints were T0 = day of initial canine retraction; T1 = 4 weeks post-initiation; T2 = 8 weeks post-initiation; and T3 = 12 weeks post-initiation. Three-dimensional palatal landmark superimpositions were made to assess amount of tooth movement (mm) at each visit, monthly rate of tooth movement (mm), and perceived pain levels (VAS scores). The total amount of tooth movement was observed in the control versus experimental groups, respectively, as 1.12 ± 0.22 mm versus 1.39 ± 0.36 mm at 4 weeks (p = 0.058), 2.59 ± 0.37 mm versus 2.49 ± 0.76 mm at 8 weeks (p = 0.702), and 3.54 ± 0.23 mm versus 3.37 ± 1.37 mm at 12 weeks (p = 0.716). The rate of tooth movement was 1.21 ± 0.32 mm/month in the control and 1.12 ± 0.20 mm/month in the experimental groups, which was not statistically significant at any of the timepoints and neither was the level of pain. This study found no statistically significant differences in canine retraction and pain perception between the experimental and control groups. We propose that further optimization of accelerated tooth movement with mechanical vibration devices is necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthodontic space closure; Orthodontics; Randomized-controlled trial; Treatment efficiency; Vibratory stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31912371     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  13 in total

1.  Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone.

Authors:  R Huiskes; R Ruimerman; G H van Lenthe; J D Janssen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Regional Acceleratory Phenomenon.

Authors:  Carlalberta Verna
Journal:  Front Oral Biol       Date:  2015-11-24

3.  Vibratory stimulation increases interleukin-1 beta secretion during orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  Chidchanok Leethanakul; Sumit Suamphan; Suwanna Jitpukdeebodintra; Udom Thongudomporn; Chairat Charoemratrote
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Orthodontic movement using pulsating force-induced piezoelectricity.

Authors:  E Shapiro; F W Roeber; L S Klempner
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1979-07

5.  The effects of a vibrational appliance on tooth movement and patient discomfort: a prospective randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Peter Miles; Heath Smith; Robert Weyant; Daniel J Rinchuse
Journal:  Aust Orthod J       Date:  2012-11

6.  Pain control in orthodontics using a micropulse vibration device: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Wendy D Lobre; Brent J Callegari; Gary Gardner; Curtis M Marsh; Anneke C Bush; William J Dunn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets.

Authors:  S Jack Burrow
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Effects of supplemental vibrational force on space closure, treatment duration, and occlusal outcome: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Andrew T DiBiase; Neil R Woodhouse; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Nicola Johnson; Carmel Slipper; James Grant; Maryam Alsaleh; Yousef Khaja; Martyn T Cobourne
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Assessment of the changes in arch perimeter and irregularity in the mandibular arch during initial alignment with the AcceleDent Aura appliance vs no appliance in adolescents: A single-blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Peter Miles; Elizabeth Fisher
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 10.  Mechanical basis of bone strength: influence of bone material, bone structure and muscle action.

Authors:  N H Hart; S Nimphius; T Rantalainen; A Ireland; A Siafarikas; R U Newton
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.041

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness of vibrational forces on orthodontic treatment : A randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Baris Can Telatar; Ahmet Yalcın Gungor
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial.

Authors:  Amit K Khera; Pradeep Raghav; Varun Mehra; Ashutosh Wadhawan; Navna Gupta; Tarun S Phull
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

Review 3.  Performance comparison of vibration devices on orthodontic tooth movement - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pasupureddi Keerthana; Rajasri Diddige; Prasad Chitra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-11-05

4.  Evaluation of the effects of diode laser application on experimental orthodontic tooth movements in rats. Histopathological analysis.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Karabel; Mehmet Doğru; Arzum Doğru; Mehmet İrfan Karadede; Mehmet Cudi Tuncer
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 1.388

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.