Orison O Woolcott1, Richard N Bergman2. 1. Sports Spectacular Diabetes and Obesity Wellness and Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. Orison.Woolcott@cshs.org. 2. Sports Spectacular Diabetes and Obesity Wellness and Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: We have recently proposed and validated a simple and accurate method to estimate whole-body fat percentage in adults, the relative fat mass (RFM), derived from the ratio of height to waist circumference. We aimed to identify RFM cutoffs to diagnose obesity based on the association between RFM and all-cause mortality. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: We used data from adult participants (≥20 years of age, n = 43,793) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2014 linked with death certificate records from the National Death Index. Optimal RFM cutoffs were determined using receiver-operating characteristic analysis (the Youden's index and the Euclidean minimum distance to the coordinate (0,1)). RESULTS: Final dataset for analyses comprised 31,008 adults. During a median follow-up of 8.3 years (IQR, 7.6-13.7), 2,517 deaths occurred. Youden and Euclidean optimal cutoffs of baseline RFM for all-cause mortality were 40.8% and 41.6% for women, and 30.9% and 28.9% for men, respectively. Similar cutoffs were obtained using measured whole-body fat percentage by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Adjusting for age, BMI category, ethnicity, education level, and smoking status, the hazard ratio for mortality using Cox proportional hazard regression was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.02-1.95) among women who had an RFM of 40.0-44.9% compared with women who had an RFM <35% (P = 0.035). Among men, the hazard ratio was 1.57 (95% CI, 1.07-2.30) among those with an RFM of 30.0-34.9% compared with men who had an RFM <25% (P = 0.020). Similar adjusted hazard ratios for same RFM categories were obtained in our validation population (NHANES III, n = 12,650, median follow-up: 23.3 years): 1.42 (95% CI, 1.01-2.00) among women (P = 0.043) and 1.50 (95% CI, 1.07-2.10) among men (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest rounded RFM cutoffs of 40% for women and 30% for men to diagnose obesity and identify individuals at higher risk of death.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: We have recently proposed and validated a simple and accurate method to estimate whole-body fat percentage in adults, the relative fat mass (RFM), derived from the ratio of height to waist circumference. We aimed to identify RFM cutoffs to diagnose obesity based on the association between RFM and all-cause mortality. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: We used data from adult participants (≥20 years of age, n = 43,793) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2014 linked with death certificate records from the National Death Index. Optimal RFM cutoffs were determined using receiver-operating characteristic analysis (the Youden's index and the Euclidean minimum distance to the coordinate (0,1)). RESULTS: Final dataset for analyses comprised 31,008 adults. During a median follow-up of 8.3 years (IQR, 7.6-13.7), 2,517 deaths occurred. Youden and Euclidean optimal cutoffs of baseline RFM for all-cause mortality were 40.8% and 41.6% for women, and 30.9% and 28.9% for men, respectively. Similar cutoffs were obtained using measured whole-body fat percentage by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Adjusting for age, BMI category, ethnicity, education level, and smoking status, the hazard ratio for mortality using Cox proportional hazard regression was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.02-1.95) among women who had an RFM of 40.0-44.9% compared with women who had an RFM <35% (P = 0.035). Among men, the hazard ratio was 1.57 (95% CI, 1.07-2.30) among those with an RFM of 30.0-34.9% compared with men who had an RFM <25% (P = 0.020). Similar adjusted hazard ratios for same RFM categories were obtained in our validation population (NHANES III, n = 12,650, median follow-up: 23.3 years): 1.42 (95% CI, 1.01-2.00) among women (P = 0.043) and 1.50 (95% CI, 1.07-2.10) among men (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest rounded RFM cutoffs of 40% for women and 30% for men to diagnose obesity and identify individuals at higher risk of death.
Authors: David A Jenkins; Jack Bowden; Heather A Robinson; Naveed Sattar; Ruth J F Loos; Martin K Rutter; Matthew Sperrin Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Lorenzo M Donini; Luca Busetto; Stephan C Bischoff; Tommy Cederholm; Maria D Ballesteros-Pomar; John A Batsis; Juergen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Dror Dicker; Stefano Frara; Gema Frühbeck; Laurence Genton; Yftach Gepner; Andrea Giustina; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Ho-Seong Han; Steven B Heymsfield; Takashi Higashiguchi; Alessandro Laviano; Andrea Lenzi; Ibolya Nyulasi; Edda Parrinello; Eleonora Poggiogalle; Carla M Prado; Javier Salvador; Yves Rolland; Ferruccio Santini; Mireille J Serlie; Hanping Shi; Cornel C Sieber; Mario Siervo; Roberto Vettor; Dennis T Villareal; Dorothee Volkert; Jianchun Yu; Mauro Zamboni; Rocco Barazzoni Journal: Obes Facts Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 4.807
Authors: Martina Gažarová; Maroš Bihari; Marta Lorková; Petra Lenártová; Marta Habánová Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Diego A Bonilla; Leidy T Duque-Zuluaga; Laura P Muñoz-Urrego; Yurany Moreno; Jorge M Vélez-Gutiérrez; Katherine Franco-Hoyos; Alejandra Agudelo-Martínez; Gustavo Humeres; Richard B Kreider; Jorge L Petro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-27 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Katarzyna Iłowiecka; Paweł Glibowski; Justyna Libera; Wojciech Koch Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-19 Impact factor: 4.614