Literature DB >> 31910676

Rationale for screening selected patients for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Kosmas I Paraskevas1, Hans-Henning Eckstein2, Dimitri P Mikhailidis3, Frank J Veith4,5, J David Spence6.   

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Approximately 15% of all first-ever strokes occur due to atheroembolism from a previously undetected/untreated asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS). Despite that, international guidelines do not recommend screening for ACS. The rationale for not recommending screening include: (a) the harm associated with screening, (b) the questionable clinical benefit associated with surgery, (c) the lack of proven reduction in the risk of stroke, (d) the large number of false positive/false negative tests, and (e) the cost-effectiveness of such screening programs. A critical analysis of each of these arguments is presented. Patients with ACS have a very high risk of all-cause and cardiac mortality. Detection of ACS should not be viewed as an indication for surgery, but rather as an opportunity to implement best medical treatment (BMT) and lifestyle changes to prevent not only strokes, but also cardiac events. The implementation of screening programs for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has led to a considerable reduction in the number of ruptured AAAs and AAA-related deaths. Similarly, screening high-risk individuals for ACS would enable timely identification of patients with ACS and implementation of BMT and lifestyle measures to prevent future strokes and cardiac events.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymptomatic carotid stenosis; best medical treatment; carotid endarterectomy; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31910676     DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1713075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  4 in total

1.  Another Step toward the Understanding of Carotid Artery Pathology.

Authors:  A Podlasek; R J Simpson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.966

2.  The burden of carotid-related strokes.

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Hediyeh Baradaran; Reinoud P H Bokkers; Alun H Davies; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Gianluca Faggioli; Jose Fernandes E Fernandes; Mauro Gargiulo; Arkadiusz Jawien; Mateja K Jezovnik; Stavros K Kakkos; Michael Knoflach; M Eline Kooi; Gaetano Lanza; Christos D Liapis; Ian M Loftus; Armando Mansilha; Laura Mechtouff; Antoine Millon; Piotr Myrcha; Andrew N Nicolaides; Rodolfo Pini; Pavel Poredos; Jean-Baptiste Ricco; Tatjana Rundek; Luca Saba; Mauro Silvestrini; Francesco Spinelli; Francesco Stilo; Sherif Sultan; Jasjit S Suri; Alexei V Svetlikov; Tissa Wijeratne; Clark J Zeebregts; Peter Gloviczki
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-02

3.  Roadmap Consensus on Carotid Artery Plaque Imaging and Impact on Therapy Strategies and Guidelines: An International, Multispecialty, Expert Review and Position Statement.

Authors:  L Saba; W Brinjikji; J D Spence; M Wintermark; M Castillo; G J de Borst; Q Yang; C Yuan; A Buckler; M Edjlali; T Saam; D Saloner; B K Lal; D Capodanno; J Sun; N Balu; R Naylor; A V D Lugt; B A Wasserman; M E Kooi; J Wardlaw; J Gillard; G Lanzino; U Hedin; D Mikulis; A Gupta; J K DeMarco; C Hess; J V Goethem; T Hatsukami; P Rothwell; M M Brown; A R Moody
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.966

Review 4.  Why are we still debating criteria for carotid artery stenosis?

Authors:  Victor J Del Brutto; Heather L Gornik; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.