Literature DB >> 31909884

First-in-man study of a thinner-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (FUTURE-I): Three-year clinical and imaging outcomes.

Lei Song1, Zhongwei Sun2, Changdong Guan2, Hongbing Yan1,3, Mengyue Yu1, Jingang Cui1, Chaowei Mu1, Hong Qiu1, Yida Tang1,3, Yanyan Zhao4, Shubin Qiao1,3, Harry Suryapranata5, Runlin Gao1,3, Bo Xu2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The FUTURE-I study aimed to assess preliminary safety and effectiveness with the long-term clinical and imaging follow-up for the Firesorb (MicroPort, Shanghai, China), a thinner-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BRS).
BACKGROUND: First-generation BRS has been associated with unexpected device-related adverse outcomes at long-term follow-up.
METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, first-in-man study, patients with single de novo lesions in native coronary arteries were randomized 2:1 into two cohorts after successful Firesorb implantation: cohort 1 (n = 30) underwent multimodality imaging assessment at 6 and 24 months; and cohort 2 (n = 15) at 12 and 36 months. All patients underwent clinical follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months and annually up to 5 years.
RESULTS: Between January and March 2016, 45 patients were enrolled. At 3-year follow-up, one patient had experienced target lesion failure and none scaffold thrombosis. In-scaffold minimal lumen diameter decreased significantly from 6-month to 2-year (2.53 ± 0.24 mm vs. 2.27 ± 0.37 mm, p = .0003), and only numerically from 1-year to 3-year follow-up (2.48 ± 0.28 mm vs. 2.22 ± 0.13 mm, p = .08). By optical coherence tomography, neointimal strut coverage at 3-year follow-up was 99.8%, and very low rate of late scaffold discontinuity was observed, only in one patient on two cross sections with three malapposed struts.
CONCLUSIONS: At 3-year follow-up of the FUTURE-I study, implantation of the thinner-strut Firesorb BRS appeared preliminary feasible and effective in the treatment of patients with noncomplex coronary lesions.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioresorbable scaffold; intravascular ultrasound; optical coherence tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31909884     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  2 in total

Review 1.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Xiang Peng; Wenbo Qu; Ying Jia; Yani Wang; Bo Yu; Jinwei Tian
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-11-30

2.  Three-year outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus second-generation drug-eluting stents: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Junsong Ke; Hongyu Zhang; Jun Huang; Ping Lv; Yun Chen; Kai Xu; Wenxue Yang; Bangyan Tu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.