Literature DB >> 3190970

Comparison of chloral hydrate and midazolam by mouth as premedicants in children undergoing otolaryngological surgery.

L Saarnivaara1, L Lindgren, U M Klemola.   

Abstract

Chloral hydrate 25, 50 or 75 mg kg-1 or midazolam 0.4, 0.5 or 0.6 mg kg-1, all given by mouth in combination with atropine 0.03 mg kg-1, were compared as premedication in 248 children in a randomized, double-blind study. Chloral hydrate was significantly less palatable than midazolam. The anxiolytic effect of chloral hydrate 75 mg kg-1 was "good" in children younger than 5 yr, whereas the other doses of chloral hydrate, and all doses of midazolam, provided only "fair" anxiolysis in this age group. All doses of both premedicants provided good anxiolysis in the older children. A satisfactory antisialogogue effect was seen in 83-90% of each group. About 20 min after extubation, restlessness was observed in 15-25% of the younger children premedicated with chloral hydrate 25 mg kg-1 or with midazolam 0.4 or 0.6 mg kg-1. The mean total recovery score (0-10) based on activity, ventilation, heart rate, conscious level and colour ranged between 5.8 and 6.8 at 10 min and between 9 and 9.5 at 70 min after extubation in all groups. Midazolam 0.5 mg kg-1 is recommended for children less than 5 yr of age and midazolam 0.4-0.5 mg kg-1 for older ones. Chloral hydrate 75 mg kg-1 provided good anxiolysis in both age groups; however, it was less palatable than the midazolam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3190970     DOI: 10.1093/bja/61.4.390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  13 in total

1.  Effects of midazolam on explicit vs implicit memory in a pediatric surgery setting.

Authors:  Sherry H Stewart; Susan E Buffett-Jerrott; G Allen Finley; Kristi D Wright; Teresa Valois Gomez
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Techniques for induction of general anesthesia in the pediatric dental patient.

Authors:  L D Trapp
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1992

3.  Premedication of children with oral midazolam.

Authors:  C O McMillan; I A Spahr-Schopfer; N Sikich; E Hartley; J Lerman
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Oral premedication for paediatric ambulatory anaesthesia: a comparison of midazolam and ketamine.

Authors:  P J Alderson; J Lerman
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  A pilot study of the efficacy of oral midazolam for sedation in pediatric dental patients.

Authors:  D A Haas; S A Nenniger; R Yacobi; J G Magathan; H A Grad; P E Copp; M D Charendoff
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1996

6.  Effects of benzodiazepines on explicit memory in a paediatric surgery setting.

Authors:  Susan E Buffett-Jerrott; Sherry H Stewart; G Allen Finley; Heather Lee Loughlan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-07-04       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Preparing children for the operating room: psychological issues.

Authors:  T McGraw
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Intravenous Midazolam Versus a Commercially Prepared Syrup.

Authors:  Katayoun Salem; Hossein Khoshrang; Maryam Kousha; Mahboobeh Hoseini; Marzieh Ranjbar; Shadi Baniasadi; Jamshid Salamzadeh
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 0.364

9.  Two Oral Midazolam Preparations in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Katayoun Salem; Shaqayegh Kamranzadeh; Maryam Kousha; Shahnaz Shaeghi; Fatemeh AbdollahGorgi
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2015-05-20

10.  Is midazolam superior to triclofos and hydroxyzine as premedicant in children?

Authors:  Sujata Chaudhary; Reena Jindal; Gautam Girotra; Rashmi Salhotra; Rajesh Singh Rautela; Ashok Kumar Sethi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.