BACKGROUND: To achieve high image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) pulmonary vein (PV) angiography prior catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation, optimal timing of the angiographic sequence during contrast agent passage is important. The present study identified influential cardiovascular parameters for prediction of contrast agent travel time. METHODS: One hundred six consecutive patients underwent a CMR examination including three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced PV angiography with real-time bolus tracking prior to catheter ablation. Correct scan timing was characterized by relative signal enhancement measurements in the pulmonary artery, left atrium (LA), and ascending aorta. Furthermore, left- and right-ventricular function, left- and right-atrial dimensions, presence of mitral or tricuspid insufficiencies, and main pulmonary artery diameter were determined. RESULTS: The highest relative signal enhancement in LA demonstrated optimal scan timing. Contrast agent travel time showed wide variability (range: 12-42 s; mean: 18 ± 4 s). On univariate analysis, most cardiovascular parameters correlated with contrast agent travel time while on multivariate analysis left- and right-ventricular function remained the only independent predictors, but overall a poor fit to the data (adjusted R2, 27.5%) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast agent travel time was mainly influenced by left- and right-ventricular function but prediction models poorly fitted the data. Thus, 3D PV angiography prior to PV ablation procedures necessitates real-time assessment, with visual determination of individual contrast agent passage time to ensure consistently high CMR image quality.
BACKGROUND: To achieve high image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) pulmonary vein (PV) angiography prior catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation, optimal timing of the angiographic sequence during contrast agent passage is important. The present study identified influential cardiovascular parameters for prediction of contrast agent travel time. METHODS: One hundred six consecutive patients underwent a CMR examination including three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced PV angiography with real-time bolus tracking prior to catheter ablation. Correct scan timing was characterized by relative signal enhancement measurements in the pulmonary artery, left atrium (LA), and ascending aorta. Furthermore, left- and right-ventricular function, left- and right-atrial dimensions, presence of mitral or tricuspid insufficiencies, and main pulmonary artery diameter were determined. RESULTS: The highest relative signal enhancement in LA demonstrated optimal scan timing. Contrast agent travel time showed wide variability (range: 12-42 s; mean: 18 ± 4 s). On univariate analysis, most cardiovascular parameters correlated with contrast agent travel time while on multivariate analysis left- and right-ventricular function remained the only independent predictors, but overall a poor fit to the data (adjusted R2, 27.5%) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast agent travel time was mainly influenced by left- and right-ventricular function but prediction models poorly fitted the data. Thus, 3D PV angiography prior to PV ablation procedures necessitates real-time assessment, with visual determination of individual contrast agent passage time to ensure consistently high CMR image quality.
Authors: Lawrence G Rudski; Wyman W Lai; Jonathan Afilalo; Lanqi Hua; Mark D Handschumacher; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Scott D Solomon; Eric K Louie; Nelson B Schiller Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Paulus Kirchhof; Stefano Benussi; Dipak Kotecha; Anders Ahlsson; Dan Atar; Barbara Casadei; Manuel Castella; Hans-Christoph Diener; Hein Heidbuchel; Jeroen Hendriks; Gerhard Hindricks; Antonis S Manolis; Jonas Oldgren; Bogdan Alexandru Popescu; Ulrich Schotten; Bart Van Putte; Panagiotis Vardas; Stefan Agewall; John Camm; Gonzalo Baron Esquivias; Werner Budts; Scipione Carerj; Filip Casselman; Antonio Coca; Raffaele De Caterina; Spiridon Deftereos; Dobromir Dobrev; José M Ferro; Gerasimos Filippatos; Donna Fitzsimons; Bulent Gorenek; Maxine Guenoun; Stefan H Hohnloser; Philippe Kolh; Gregory Y H Lip; Athanasios Manolis; John McMurray; Piotr Ponikowski; Raphael Rosenhek; Frank Ruschitzka; Irina Savelieva; Sanjay Sharma; Piotr Suwalski; Juan Luis Tamargo; Clare J Taylor; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Adriaan A Voors; Stephan Windecker; Jose Luis Zamorano; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Paul D Stein; Thomas L Chenevert; Sarah E Fowler; Lawrence R Goodman; Alexander Gottschalk; Charles A Hales; Russell D Hull; Kathleen A Jablonski; Kenneth V Leeper; David P Naidich; Daniel J Sak; H Dirk Sostman; Victor F Tapson; John G Weg; Pamela K Woodard Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Nassir F Marrouche; David Wilber; Gerhard Hindricks; Pierre Jais; Nazem Akoum; Francis Marchlinski; Eugene Kholmovski; Nathan Burgon; Nan Hu; Lluis Mont; Thomas Deneke; Mattias Duytschaever; Thomas Neumann; Moussa Mansour; Christian Mahnkopf; Bengt Herweg; Emile Daoud; Erik Wissner; Paul Bansmann; Johannes Brachmann Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Christopher J François; David Tuite; Vibhas Deshpande; Renate Jerecic; Peter Weale; James C Carr Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 11.105