| Literature DB >> 31909226 |
Nebiyu Gizaw1, Adugna Abera2, Solomon Sisay3, Kassu Desta4, Saskia Kreibich5, Lisa Gerwing-Adima6, Solomon Gebre-Selassie1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Smear microscopy is the mainstay for diagnosis of Tuberculosis (TB) in Ethiopia. This technique; however, is insensitive to detect Mycobacteria from most clinical specimens. Currently, light emitting diode (LED) fluorescence microscope is advocated to be used in high Tuberculosis (TB) burden settings by World Health Organization (WHO). However, the utility of this method is not evaluated for bleach treated sputum samples in Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Auramine O; Bleach concentration; Light emitting diode; St. Peter Hospital, TB
Year: 2019 PMID: 31909226 PMCID: PMC6939099 DOI: 10.1016/j.jctube.2019.100140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis ISSN: 2405-5794
Socio-demographic characteristics, clinical findings and yield of AFB results by different diagnostic tools among TB suspected cases at St. Peter specialized Hospital, 2015, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| Variables | Yield of AFB | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZN ( | Direct AO ( | Concentrated AO( | Culture ( | ||
| Sex | |||||
| Male ( | 38(76) | 54(75%) | 78(86.7) | 82(74.5) | |
| Female ( | 12(24) | 18(25) | 22(24.4) | 28(25.5) | |
| Total | 50 | 72 | 90 | 110 | |
| Age groups (in years) | |||||
| 15–24 | 13(26) | 22(30.6) | 24(26.7) | 30(27.3) | |
| 25–34 | 15(30) | 23(31.9) | 26(28.9) | 34(30.9) | |
| 35–44 | 5(10) | 7(9.7) | 13(14.4) | 14(12.7) | |
| 45–54 | 5(10) | 7(9.7) | 9(10) | 12(10.9) | |
| 55–64 | 7(14) | 9(12.5) | 13(14.4) | 15(13.6) | |
| >65 | 5(10) | 4((5.6) | 5(5.6) | 5(4.5) | |
| Total | 50 | 72 | 90 | 110 | |
| Clinical presentations | |||||
| Fever | Yes | 41(82) | 62(86.1) | 76(84.4) | 99(90) |
| No | 1(2) | 2(2.8) | 0 | 1(0.9) | |
| Chest pain | Yes | 40(80) | 60(83.3) | 72(80) | 97(88.2) |
| No | 2(4) | 4(5.6) | 4(4.4) | 3(2.7) | |
| Hemoptysis | Yes | 6(12) | 10(13.9) | 10(11.1) | 15(13.6) |
| No | 36(72) | 54(75) | 66(73.3) | 85(77.3) | |
| Night sweat | Yes | 42(84) | 64(88.9) | 76(84.4) | 99(90) |
| No | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1(0.9) | |
| Weight loss | Yes | 36(72) | 54(75) | 63(70) | 80(72.7) |
| No | 6(12) | 10(13.9) | 13(14.4) | 20(18.2) | |
N = Number; AFB= Acid Fast Bacilli; ZN = Ziehl-Neelsen; AO= Auramine O.
Chest radiograph findings in pulmonary tuberculosis suspected patients (N = 346).
| Variables | DAO | CAO | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive (%) | Negative(%) | Total (%) | Positive (%) | Negative (%) | Total (%) | |
| Abnormal | 69(19.9) | 3(0.9) | 72(20.8) | 85(24.6) | 5(1.5) | 90(26) |
| Normal | 73(21.1) | 201(58.1) | 274(79.2) | 57(16.4) | 199(57.5) | 256(74) |
| Total | 142(41) | 204(59) | 346(100) | 142(41) | 204(59) | 346(100) |
DAO = Direct Auramine O staining; CAO= Concentrated with bleach and stained by AO.
Detection rate of pulmonary tuberculosis by different diagnostic tools.
| Diagnostic tools | Outcomes | Frequency (%) | Detection rate | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TB culture | Positive | 110(31.8) | 31.8% | 27.2 – 36.4 |
| Negative | 236(68.2) | |||
| Direct ZN | Positive | 50(14.5) | 14.5% | 11 – 17.9 |
| Negative | 296(85.5) | |||
| Direct AO staining | Positive | 72(20.8) | 20% | 16.5 - 24.9 |
| Negative | 274(79.2) | |||
| Sputum concentration and staining with AO | Positive | 90(26) | 26% | 20.2 – 29.5 |
| Negative | 256(74) |
TB= Tuberculosis; CI= Confidence Interval; ZN = Ziehl-Neelsen; AO= Auramine O.
Comparison of direct and concentrated AO stained smears against ZN staining and culture method (N = 346).
| Diagnostic tools | Outcomes | Culture | Total | Culture as gold standard | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive ( | Negative ( | ||||
| Direct ZN ( | Positive | 49 | 1 | 50 | Sn=44.5%, Sp=99.6% |
| Negative | 61 | 235 | 296 | Κ= 0.51 (95% CI = 0.41 – 0.61) | |
| Direct AO ( | Positive | 69 | 3 | 72 | Sn=62.7%, Sp=98.7% |
| Negative | 41 | 233 | 274 | ||
| Concentrated AO ( | Positive | 85 | 5 | 90 | Sn=77.3%, Sp= 97.8% |
| Negative | 25 | 231 | 256 | ||
ZN = Zehil-Neelsen; AO = Auramine O; Sn = Sensitivity; Sp = Specificity; K = kappa value; CI = Confidence Interval; N = Number.
Distribution of quantified smear results by different techniques according to (IUATLD/WHO) scale.
| Grades | Staining techniques (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct ZN ( | Direct AO ( | Concentrated AO ( | |
| Scanty | 4(8) | 11(15.3) | 18(20) |
| +1 | 18(36) | 25(34.7) | 15(16.7) |
| +2 | 12(24) | 20(27.8) | 23(25.5) |
| +3 | 16(32) | 16(22.2) | 34(37.8) |
| Total | 50(100) | 72(100) | 90(100) |
ZN = Zehil-Neelsen; O = Auramine O; N = Number.