| Literature DB >> 31909060 |
Valeria Hirschler1, Claudio Gonzalez1, Claudia Molinari1, Hernan Velez2, Mariela Nordera3, Rodrigo Suarez2, Alberto Robredo2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare blood pressure (BP) levels in three groups of Argentinean Indigenous schoolchildren from similar ethnic backgrounds but living at three different altitudes.Entities:
Keywords: blood pressure; high altitude; school children
Year: 2019 PMID: 31909060 PMCID: PMC6940575 DOI: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.4.370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIMS Public Health ISSN: 2327-8994
Figure 1.Study flowchart.
Anthropometric measurements, BP and lipid levels of children from SAC, Cobres and CH.
| CH (n = 167) | Cobres (n = 47) | SAC (n = 185) | |
| Age (years)** (b) | 9.31± 2.12 | 8.17 ± 2.58 | 8.4 ± 2.39 |
| Weight (Kg)**(b) | 37.14± 13.79 | 26.52 ± 7.6 | 27.47 ± 9.04 |
| Height (m)**(b) | 1.37± 0.13 | 1.27 ± 0.15 | 1.27 ± 0.14 |
| Waist (cm)**(b) | 67.49 ± 12.75 | 56.51 ± 4.82 | 59.17 ± 8 .13 |
| BMI**(b) | 19.21 ± 4.46 | 16.09 ± 1.43 | 16.59 ± 2.62 |
| BMI percentile**(b) | 60.01 ± 28.69 | 44.11 ± 22.66 | 37.31 ± 26.15 |
| z-BMI**(b) | 0.37 ± 1.06 | −0.15 ± 0.73 | −0.43 ± 0.88 |
| Systolic BP (mm Hg)**(a) | 69.52 ± 14.39 | 77.54 ± 9.63 | 86.31 ± 12.97 |
| Diastolic BP (mm Hg)**(c) | 47.48 ± 10.9 | 51.52 ± 6.31 | 56.86 ± 12.78 |
| MAP (mm Hg)**(a) | 54.83 ± 11.62 | 60.2 ± 7.11 | 66.68 ± 12.32 |
| Hematocrit (%)**(b) | 41.10 ± 2.59 | 46.34 ± 2.32 | 44.25 ± 2.38 |
| Oxygen Saturation (%)**(a) | 95.42 ± 2.84 | 89.32 ± 7.47 | |
| TG (mg/dL) | 87.81 ± 41.21 | 96.47 ± 41.52 | 103.61 ± 39.13 |
| HDL-C(mg/dL)** (e) | 48.4 ± 10.64 | 34.35 ± 8.59 | 45.77 ± 8.48 |
| TG/HDL-C**(a) | 1.97 ± 1.23 | 3.11 ± 1.86 | 2.39 ± 1.15 |
Note: SAC, San Antonio de los Cobres; CH, Chicoana; BMI, body mass index; Data were presented as mean ± SD. Z-score is a quantitative measure of the deviation of a specific variable taken from the mean of that population. Significance: **p<0.01. All means were significantly different. CH was significantly different than Cobres and SAC. SAC was significantly different than CH and Cobres. SAC was significantly different than CH. Cobres was significantly different than CH and SAC.
Multiple regression analysis.
| Model | Non-Stand. Coefficients | Stand. Coefficients | ||||
| B | Standard Error | Beta | t | Sig. | R2 | |
| Age | 1.13 | 0.28 | 0.17 | 4.11 | < 0.01 | 0.40 |
| Sex | 0.02 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.99 | |
| Altitude | 10.55 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 15.59 | < 0.01 | |
| BMI | 1.18 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 6.48 | < 0.01 | |
| Dependent Variable SBP |
Multiple regression analysis.
| Model | Non-Stand. Coefficients | Stand. Coefficients | ||||
| B | Standard Error | Beta | t | Sig. | R2 | |
| Age | 0.83 | 0.25 | 0.16 | 3.37 | < 0.01 | 0.25 |
| Sex | 1.68 | 1.07 | 0.07 | 1.57 | 0.12 | |
| Altitude | 6.27 | 0.61 | 0.48 | 10.34 | < 0.01 | |
| BMI | 0.87 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 5.29 | < 0.01 | |
| Dependent Variable DBP |
Multiple regression analysis.
| Model | Non-Stand. Coefficients | Stand. Coefficients | ||||
| B | Standard Error | Beta | t | Sig. | R2 | |
| Age | 0.93 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 3.81 | < 0.01 | 0.32 |
| Sex | 1.13 | 1.06 | 0.04 | 1.06 | 0.29 | |
| Altitude | 7.69 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 12.82 | < 0.01 | |
| BMI | 0.97 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 6.00 | < 0.01 | |
| Dependent Variable MAP |