| Literature DB >> 31908705 |
Xiaogang Chen1, Guangye Wang1, Yuan-Tian Qin2, Jin Li1, Pu Wang1, Wenjun Huang3, Jie Chen1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery using traditional methods to remove the posterior longitudinal ligament often causes massive bleeding, increasing the risk of surgery. However, the use of a high-frequency electrotome under the microscope can significantly reduce bleeding and reduce the risk of surgery. AIM: To explore the clinical significance of electrosurgical excision of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical anterior approach under the microscope.Entities:
Keywords: anterior approach; cervical spondylosis; electrocautery; posterior longitudinal ligament resection
Year: 2019 PMID: 31908705 PMCID: PMC6939216 DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.84827
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne ISSN: 1895-4588 Impact factor: 1.195
Photo 1The procedure of PLL removal by high-frequency electrosurgical excision under the microscope. A – Electrosurgical excision of posterior longitudinal ligament; B – isolation of the superficial layer of the posterior longitudinal ligament; C – exposure of the spinal cord after complete removal of the posterior longitudinal ligament
Comparisons of general data in the two groups
| Parameters | Group A ( | Group B ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age [years] | 44.6 ±3.96 | 45.4 ±2.43 |
| Gender: | ||
| Male | 33 | 40 |
| Female | 25 | 25 |
| Types of cervical spondylosis: | ||
| Myelopathy | 39 | 40 |
| Radiculopathy | 19 | 25 |
| Number of operation interspace: | ||
| Single | 31 | 36 |
| Double | 27 | 29 |
| Preoperative JOA score | 11.8 ±2.33 | 12.0 ±2.29 |
| Preoperative VSA score | 4.47 ±1.52 | 4.6 ±1.74 |
No significant difference was found between the two groups.
Operation time, bleeding volume and JOA score improvement rate and VAS score of two groups at 3 months after the operation
| Parameter | Group A ( | Group B ( |
|---|---|---|
| Operation time [min] | 64.3 ±17.51 | 88.32 ±23.28 |
| Bleeding volume [ml] | 15.5 ±5.15 | 55.52 ±32.52 |
| VAS score | 3.25 ±1.57 | 3.34 ±1.50 |
| Improvement rate of JOA (%) | 66.9 ±18.70 | 65.23 ±13.64 |
Data are shown as mean ± SD.
P < 0.05, vs. group A.