Literature DB >> 31907756

Effects of March of Dimes Supportive Pregnancy Care on Maternal and Infant Health Across Diverse Patient Populations: a Quasi-Experimental Multi-Site Pilot Study.

Heather Hensman Kettrey1, Katarzyna T Steinka-Fry2.   

Abstract

Group prenatal care may be a promising alternative to traditional one-on-one care. However, research on its effects has produced inconsistent findings and raises questions about effectiveness across different patient populations. This pilot study evaluated the effects of March of Dimes Supportive Pregnancy Care (SPC) on maternal health and behavior across six diverse healthcare sites. Analyses of a propensity score-matched medical record dataset aggregated across sites (N = 1950) indicated significant unfavorable effects on gestational age at delivery (b = - 0.34, p < .05), birthweight (b = - 94.55, p < .05), and low birthweight (OR = 1.10, p < .05). However, these findings did not hold up to sensitivity analyses. Significant favorable aggregate effects were observed for postpartum visit attendance (OR = 1.68; 95% CI [1.12, 2.53]), breastfeeding at delivery (OR = 1.84; 95% CI [1.20, 2.83]), and breastfeeding at follow-up (OR = 3.82; 95% CI [1.46, 9.97]). These findings remained largely consistent across sensitivity analyses. In addition to these aggregate effects, significant site-level effects were observed, but only for two sites. Both were racially homogenous, serving White and African American patient populations, respectively. Future research should determine whether these effects can be generalized to women receiving care in racially heterogeneous settings or whether they are limited to White and African American women receiving care in racially homogenous settings. Efforts to roll out SPC should be accompanied by a continual accrual of research assessing the effects of this program on maternal and infant health across a range of geographic settings and patient profiles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Group prenatal care; Infant health; Maternal health; Supportive Pregnancy Care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31907756     DOI: 10.1007/s11121-019-01083-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  14 in total

1.  Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology.

Authors:  Gabriel L Schlomer; Sheri Bauman; Noel A Card
Journal:  J Couns Psychol       Date:  2010-01

Review 3.  Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.

Authors:  Christine J Catling; Nancy Medley; Maralyn Foureur; Clare Ryan; Nicky Leap; Alison Teate; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-04

4.  Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeannette Ickovics; Jessica Lewis; Trace Kershaw; Urania Magriples
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Group prenatal care versus individual prenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Eider Ruiz-Mirazo; Maite Lopez-Yarto; Sarah D McDonald
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2012-03

Review 6.  Effectiveness of CenteringPregnancy on Breastfeeding Initiation Among African Americans: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karen Robinson; Mauricio Garnier-Villarreal; Lisa Hanson
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2018 Apr/Jun       Impact factor: 1.638

7.  One-to-many propensity score matching in cohort studies.

Authors:  Jeremy A Rassen; Abhi A Shelat; Jessica Myers; Robert J Glynn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 8.  Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ebony B Carter; Lorene A Temming; Jennifer Akin; Susan Fowler; George A Macones; Graham A Colditz; Methodius G Tuuli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeannette R Ickovics; Trace S Kershaw; Claire Westdahl; Urania Magriples; Zohar Massey; Heather Reynolds; Sharon Schindler Rising
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 731: Group Prenatal Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.