Literature DB >> 31907568

Investigating the equivalent performance of biparametric compared to multiparametric MRI in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Baojun Wang1, Jie Gao1, Qing Zhang1, Chengwei Zhang1, Guangxiang Liu1, Wang Wei1, Haifeng Huang1, Yao Fu2, Danyan Li3, Bing Zhang4, Hongqian Guo5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: PIRADS v2 stipulates that dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging be used to categorize diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI) score 3 (DWI 3) peripheral zone (PZ) lesions as PIRADS score 3 (PIRADS 3; DCE -) or PIRADS 4 (DCE +). It's controversial for the value of DCE in improving clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection. We aimed to figure out whether DCE improves csPCa detection and explore new available measures to improve csPCa detection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 375 patients who underwent mp MRI before MRI/ultrasound (US) fusion-targeted biopsy (TB) with transperineal systematic biopsy (SB). All lesions were classified as DWI 3/DCE -, DWI 3/DCE +, DWI 4/PIRADS 4 lesions. Detection rates of csPCa for each lesion group were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of each approach was analyzed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis.
RESULTS: Totally, 109 DWI 3 or DWI 4 single lesions in PZ were analyzed (n = 109). The rates of csPCa detection for Group A, Group B, Group C is 10.3%, 13.9%, 55.9%, respectively (A vs. B, p = 0.625; B vs. C, p < 0.001). ROC analysis and decision curve analysis showed the method of combining Age, PSA Density (PSAD) and the mean apparent diffusion coefficient value (ADCmean) outperforms individual approaches for csPCa detection.
CONCLUSION: For DWI 3 lesions in PZ, DCE sequence has not additional value for improving detection of csPCa. The integration of clinical characteristics and bpMRI parameter improves the detection of csPCa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biparametric MRI; Clinically significant prostate cancer; Dynamic contrast enhanced; MRI/ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy; Mean value of apparent diffusion coefficient

Year:  2020        PMID: 31907568     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02281-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic Ability of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jing Zeng; Qingqing Cheng; Dong Zhang; Meng Fan; Changzheng Shi; Liangping Luo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  STHLM3-MRI study: Role of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Abhay S Gaur
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2022-01-01

3.  Deep Learning in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Whole-Mount Histopathology Referenced Delineations.

Authors:  Danyan Li; Xiaowei Han; Jie Gao; Qing Zhang; Haibo Yang; Shu Liao; Hongqian Guo; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-13

Review 4.  Current Status of Biparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Literature Analysis.

Authors:  Mason James Belue; Enis Cagatay Yilmaz; Asha Daryanani; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.