| Literature DB >> 31907060 |
Waniganeththi Arachchige Manori Piyumal Samaranayake1, Suzanne Dempsey2, Annaleise R Howard-Jones2, Alexander Conrad Outhred2,3, Alison Margaret Kesson2,3,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Rapid diagnostic tools are imperative for timely clinical decision making, particularly in bacteraemic patients. This study evaluated the performance of a fast, inexpensive novel in house method for processing positive blood cultures for immediate identification of microorganisms by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (Vitek MS bioMérieux). We prospectively analyzed the clinical impact of such method on the management of pediatric patients. RESULT: In total, 360 positive blood cultures were included. Among 318 mono-microbial cultures, in-house method achieved correct identification in 270 (85%) cultures to the species level, whilst 43 (13.5%) gave no identification, and 7 (2.2%) gave discordant identifications. Identification of Gram-negative organisms was accurate to both species and genus level in 99% of isolates, and for Gram positives accuracy was 84% to genus and 81% to species level overall, with accuracy of 100% for Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus to the species level. Assessment of the potential impact of direct identification in sixty sequential cases revealed a clear clinical benefit in 35.5% of cases. Benefits included timely antibiotic rationalization, change of medical intervention, and early confirmation of contamination. This study demonstrates a highly accurate in-house method with considerable potential clinical benefits for paediatric care.Entities:
Keywords: Bloodstream infection; Clinical impact; Direct identification of blood culture; MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry; Pediatric
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31907060 PMCID: PMC6945395 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-019-4861-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
List of the microorganisms identified by routine method and direct in house method
| List of microorganisms identified by routine methods/number of isolates | Number of isolates identified by MALDI-TOF MS at the species level | Number of isolates identified by MALDI-TOF MS at the genus level only | Isolates not identified by MALDI-TOF MS | Isolates with discordant results | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36 | – | – | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| 45 | 1 | – | 82.1 | 97.9 | 93.3 | 94.2 | ||
| 8 | – | 1 | ||||||
| 2 | – | – | ||||||
| 2 | – | 1 | ||||||
| – | – | 1 | ||||||
| 2 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| – | – | 1 | ||||||
| 2 | – | – | ||||||
| 7 | – | 9 | ||||||
| – | – | 1 | ||||||
| Total GPC resembling Staphylococcus (120) | 105 | 1 | 14 | 88.3 | 97.5 | 95.5 | 93.2 | |
| 6 | – | 1 | ||||||
| 5 | – | 1 | ||||||
| 5 | – | 4 | ||||||
| 2 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| Other Viridans group of Streptococci (6) | – | 2 | 4 | |||||
| – | – | 1 | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 23 | – | – | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| 2 | – | – | ||||||
| Total GPC resembling Streptococcus (61) | 47 | 2 | 12 | 80.3 | 99.6 | 98 | 95.5 | |
| 2 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 4 | – | 1 | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| – | – | 1 | ||||||
| – | – | 1 | ||||||
| – | – | 1 | ||||||
| – | – | 1 | ||||||
| – | 1 | – | ||||||
| – | – | 2 | ||||||
| Total Gram positive rods (20) | 12 | 1 | 7 | 65 | 99.7 | 92.9 | 97.7 | |
| 29 | – | – | ||||||
| 11 | – | – | ||||||
| 2 | – | – | ||||||
| 21 | – | 1 | ||||||
| 14 | – | – | ||||||
| 4 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 9 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 7 | – | – | ||||||
| 1 | – | – | ||||||
| 2 | – | – | ||||||
| Total Gram negatives (107) | 106 | – | 1 | 99 | 100 | 100 | 99.5 | |
| – | – | 1 | ||||||
| – | – | 9 | ||||||
| Total yeast (10) | – | – | 10 |
MALDI-TOF matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value
Summary of cases for which rapid organism identification would have impacted clinical decision making
| Case number | Gram stain day one | Clinical context | Antibiotics on day one | Organisms identified by direct MALDI-ToF on day one | Organisms identified from sub-culture day two | Antibiotic change on day two | Medical/surgical intervention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GNR | Pyelonephritis | Vancomycin and Gentamicin | Cefotaxime and Cotrimoxazole added | Neprostomy tube removed | ||
| 2 | GNR | Febrile neutropenia due to UTI | Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Gentamicin | Cefotaxime added. Gentamicin continued | – | ||
| 3 | GNR | Post-operative liver transplant infection | No antibiotics | Imipenem added | Interventions to sterilise line with antibiotic locks | ||
| 4 | GPR | Myonecrosis | Piperacillin/Tazobactam, Clindamycin and Vancomycin | High dose benzyl penicillin added clindamycin continued; tazocin and vancomycin ceased | Urgent re-exploration of leg as necrotising fasciitis | ||
| 5 | GPCSTR | Intra muscular abscess | Penicillin and Flucloxacillin | Penicillin continued Flucloxacillin stopped | MRI to rule out septic arthritis | ||
| 6 | GPCSTR | Meningitis | Cefotaxine, Gentamicin and Ampicillin | Benzylpenicillin added Cefotaxime, Gentamicin, Ampicillin ceased | – | ||
| 7 | GPCSTA | Congenital heart disease with fever | Vancomycin and Gentamicin | Vancomycin continued Gentamicin ceased | – | ||
| 8 | GPCSTA | Febrile neutropenia | Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Vancomycin | Vancomycin continued Piperacillin/Tazobactam ceased | CVL removed | ||
| 9 | GPCSTA | Primary immune deficiency with fever | Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Vancomycin | Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Vancomycin continued | CVL removed | ||
| 10 | GPCSTA | Acute bronchiolitis | Vancomycin | Vancomycin ceased as probable contamination | – | ||
| 11 | GPCSTR | Cerebral palsy | Vancomycin | Vancomycin ceased as probable contamination | – |
MALDI-TOF matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight, GNR Gram negative rods, GPR Gram positive rods, GPCSTR Gram positive Staphylococci, GPCSTA Gram positive Streptococci, CVL central venous line, UTI urinary tract infection
Fig. 1Renal tract ultrasound showing appearance of hydro-nephrosis of right kidney and dilated right ureter (diameter 12.1 mm) on initial presentation. Rt Kidney right kidney, Rt Ureter right ureter, Dist A distance A (12.1 mm)