| Literature DB >> 31906924 |
Arvind Kumar1, Suman Saurabh2, Sarosh Jamil3, Vijay Kumar4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A visceral leishmaniasis outbreak was reported from a village in a low-endemic district of Bihar, India.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemic; India; Indoor residual spraying; Kala-azar; Migration; Outbreak; Visceral leishmaniasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31906924 PMCID: PMC6945436 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4719-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Location of the outbreak in Sheikhpura, Bihar, India – a) location of kala-azar endemic area in the eastern part of India b) location of Sheikhpura district among the kala-azar endemic districts in India c) location of the affected village within Sheikhpura district. (Modified from source file - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:India_districts_map.svg, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license)
Fig. 2Reporting of kala-azar cases from Sheikhpura sadar block, Sheikhpura Warsaliganj block, Nawada adjacent to Kosra village (2013–2018)
Data source: District Vector Borne Disease Control Office, Sheikhpura, Bihar, India.
Fig. 3Flowchart showing evolution of the kala-azar outbreak until December 2018
Fig. 4Spot map of the kala-azar cases in Kosra village and inset showing nearest neighbour distance of the cases (n = 70 cases). (A computer-drawn schematic base map has been purposely inserted in place of satellite image so that spatial relationship is shown while individual cases’ location can’t be linked to specific houses. Satellite image of the village can be viewed separately at Earth Explorer- https://earthexplorer.usgs.govby searching for ‘Kosra, Bihar, India’)
Fig. 5Time distribution of kala-azar cases (n = 70) at Kosra village until December 2018 – a) by month of developing fever and b) by month of being diagnosed for kala-azar
Area of residence and age-wise attack rates (incidence proportion) of kala-azar in Kosra village, stratified by gender (70 cases)
| Characteristics | Male | Female | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of VL/ Population in group | Attack rate (%) | No. of VL/ population in group | Attack rate (%) | No. of VL/ population group | Attack rate (%) | |
| Area of residence | ||||||
| 39/ 158 | 24.7 | 24/ 174 | 13.8 | 63/ 332 | 19.0 | |
| 4/ 759 | 0.5 | 3/ 667 | 0.4 | 7/ 1426 | 0.5 | |
| Age group* | ||||||
| 14 / 365 | 3.8 | 9 / 320 | 2.8 | 23/ 685 | 3.4 | |
| 12 /199 | 6.0 | 9 / 232 | 3.9 | 21/ 431 | 4.9 | |
| 10 / 153 | 6.5 | 3 / 137 | 2.2 | 13/ 290 | 4.5 | |
| 3 / 98 | 4.1 | 4 / 90 | 4.4 | 7/ 188 | 3.7 | |
| 4 / 102 | 3.9 | 2 / 62 | 3.2 | 6/ 164 | 3.7 | |
| Total | 43 / 917 | 4.7 | 27/841 | 3.2 | 70/ 1758 | 4.0 |
Since gender details of 9 enumerated individuals were missing, denominator is 1758 instead of 1767. * For age-group, Chi-square = 1.86, df = 4, p = 0.762. VL – Visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar)
Health seeking behaviour, access to diagnosis, treatment and preventive services and risk factors for kala-azar (n = 50 kala-azar patients, unless stated otherwise)
| Characteristics | N | % |
|---|---|---|
| Type of health facility where care was first sought for fever | ||
| Government PHC/ Government District hospital | 6 | 12 |
| Quack (unqualified practitioner) | 18 | 36 |
| Private qualified physician | 19 | 38 |
| Didn’t contact anyone (found first on active case search) | 6 | 12 |
| Type of first health facility contact in context of migration | ||
| With migration | 10 | 20 |
| Without migration | 40 | 80 |
| Place of diagnosis of kala-azar | ||
| District hospital | 33 | 66 |
| In village during active case search | 15 | 30 |
| Others (private facility) | 2 | 4 |
| Person who motivated to get tested for kala-azar | ||
| ASHA (Accredited Social Health Activist) | 34 | 78 |
| ANM (Auxiliary Nursing Midwife) | 13 | 26 |
| Self | 2 | 4 |
| Another community member | 1 | 2 |
| Informed about single day treatment after diagnosis | 41 | 82 |
| Informed about monetary incentive of Rs 7100 (USD 100) | 44 | 88 |
| Received monetary incentive ( | 36 | 80 |
| Focal spray conducted within 2 weeks of fever onset | 20 | 40 |
| Quality of spray in preceding focal IRS of May 2017 ( | ||
| All rooms and animal shelter(s) spayed | 21 | 50 |
| One or more rooms or animal shelter(s) missed | 21 | 50 |
| Health worker asked for history of fever among other family members | 46 | 92 |
| Awareness regarding mode of spread of Kala-azar | ||
| Through sandfly bite | 16 | 32 |
| Through mosquito bite | 12 | 24 |
| Through dirty water | 21 | 42 |
| Directly from infected person | 1 | 2 |
| Awareness regarding duration for which walls should not be smeared or painted after IRS | ||
| More than 90 days | 0 | 0 |
| 60–90 days | 12 | 24 |
| Less than 60 days | 13 | 26 |
| Don’t know | 25 | 50 |
| Having awareness that animal shelter spraying is necessary for kala-azar prevention | 31 | 62 |
| Illiteracy | 43 | 86 |
| Belonging to scheduled caste | 46 | 92 |
| Occupation – labourer | 28 | 56 |
| Migration | 29 | 58 |
| Poverty (Per capita income per month < Rs 1000) | 43 | 86 |
| Domestic animal ownership | 16 | 32 |
| Animal shelter location within house | 7 | 14 |
| Residing in thatched mud house without windows | 26 | 52 |
| Sleeping in room with unplastered walls | 45 | 90 |
| Sleeping on floor | 24 | 48 |
| Non-use of mosquito net | 40 | 80 |
Fig. 6Category and location of migration sites of kala-azar cases (n = 29). (Modified from source file - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:India_districts_map.svg, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license)
Entomological findings in the southern hamlet of the affected village
| Characteristics | n / total | % |
|---|---|---|
| Households found positive for sandfly | 28/ 34 | 82.4 |
| Female percentage | 14/ 37 | 37.8 |
| Households found positive for sandfly | 8/ 8 | 100 |
| Female percentage | 10/ 25 | 40.0 |
| Cone bio-assay | ||
| Knockdown | 82/ 136 | 60.3 |
| Mortality (24 h) | 107/ 136 | 78.7 |
| Knockdown | 30/ 60 | 50.0 |
| Mortality (24 h) | 37/ 60 | 61.7 |
Bioassay control: 0% mortality