| Literature DB >> 31906872 |
Mohammad Javad Abbaszadeh Afshar1, Maryam Barkhori Mehni2, Mostafa Rezaeian3, Mehdi Mohebali3, Vali Baigi4, Somayeh Amiri5, Mohammad Bagher Amirshekari5, Ruhollah Hamidinia5, Mohammad Samimi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Determination of the prevalence and distribution pattern of intestinal parasites is a fundamental step to set up an effective control program to improve the health status. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and associated risk factors among inhabitants of Rudbar-e Jonub county, southeast of Kerman province, southeastern Iran.Entities:
Keywords: Human; Intestinal parasites; Iran; Prevalence
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31906872 PMCID: PMC6945597 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4730-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Map of the study area. Left: Map of Iran, Right: Location of Rudbar-e Jonub county in Kerman province
Socio-demographic characteristics of participants (n = 861)
| Characteristics | Number | Percent (un-weighted) | Percent (weighted) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Male | 400 | 46.5 | 46.1 |
| Female | 461 | 53.5 | 53.9 |
| Age group | |||
| ≤ 9 | 234 | 27.2 | 25.9 |
| 10 to 19 | 151 | 17.5 | 16.7 |
| 20 to 29 | 134 | 15.6 | 15.5 |
| 30 to 39 | 156 | 18.1 | 18.4 |
| 40 to 49 | 98 | 11.4 | 11.5 |
| 50≤ | 88 | 10.2 | 12 |
| Occupation | |||
| Housewife | 222 | 25.8 | 26.6 |
| Children | 132 | 15.3 | 13.2 |
| Student | 202 | 23.5 | 24.2 |
| Farmer | 136 | 15.8 | 15.7 |
| Employed | 70 | 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Unemployed | 24 | 2.8 | 2.5 |
| Others | 75 | 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Education level | |||
| Children under 6-yr | 135 | 15.7 | 13.6 |
| Elementary school | 242 | 28.1 | 28.9 |
| High school | 256 | 29.7 | 30.1 |
| University | 55 | 6.4 | 6.9 |
| Illiterate | 173 | 20.1 | 20.5 |
| Source of drinking water | |||
| Tap water | 558 | 64.8 | 64.4 |
| Spring or well water | 303 | 35.2 | 35.6 |
| Animal close contact | |||
| Yes | 501 | 58.2 | 60.1 |
| No | 360 | 41.8 | 39.9 |
| Residency status | |||
| Rural | 751 | 87.2 | 87.7 |
| Urban | 110 | 12.8 | 12.3 |
Prevalence of intestinal parasites in the participants (n = 861)
| Parasite | Number of infected | Prevalence (95%CIa) |
|---|---|---|
| Protozoa | ||
| | 114 | 13.3 (11.0 to 15.5) |
| | 98 | 11.4 (8.7 to 15.4) |
| | 92 | 10.6 (8.5 to 13.1) |
| | 14 | 1.5 (0.8 to 2.6) |
| | 11 | 1.0 (0.5 to 1.9) |
| | 5 | 0.5 (0.1 to 1.2) |
| | 4 | 0.4 (0.1 to 1.0) |
| Totalb | 280 | 32.3 (28.4 to 36.5) |
| Helminths | ||
| | 22 | 2.4 (1.5 to 3.9) |
| | 3 | 0.3 (0.0 to 0.9) |
| | 3 | 0.3 (0.1 to 1.3) |
| Total | 28 | 3.2 (2.1 to 4.7) |
| Totalb | 295 | 34.2 (30.1 to 38.2) |
aCI confidence interval
bThere were also some cases of coinfection with two or three species
Univariate and multiple analysis of intestinal parasitic infections and potential risk factors (n = 861)
| Risk factors | Prevalence (95% CI) | ORa (95% CI) | ORb (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Male | 35.4 (29.1 to 42.4) | 1 | 1 |
| Female | 32.8 (28.1 to 37.8) | 1.0 (0.7 to 1.3) | 1.1 (0.8 to 1.6) |
| Age group | |||
| ≤ 9 | 42.6 (34.6 to 53.7) | 1 | 1 |
| 10 to 19 | 35.9 (28.0 to 44.7) | 0.8 (0.5 to 1.3) | 0.7 (0.3 to 1.1) |
| 20 to 29 | 23.9 (17.0 to 32.5) | 0.5 (0.3 to 0.8) | 0.4 (0.2 to 1.0) |
| 30 to 39 | 31.1 (23.9 to 39.4) | 0.7 (0.4 to 1.1) | 0.8 (0.4 to 1.2) |
| 40 to 49 | 36.2 (26.4 to 47.3) | 0.8 (0.4 to 1.3) | 0.8 (0.4 to 1.4) |
| 50≤ | 25.4 (16.4 to 37.2) | 0.6 (0.3 to 1.1) | 0.5 (0.3 to 1.2) |
| Occupation | |||
| Housewife | 30.6 (24.1 to 38.0) | 1 | 1 |
| Children | 32.4 (24.5 to 41.4) | 1.0 (0.6 to 1.7) | 2.2 (0.5 to 3.8) |
| Student | 45.8 (36.0 to 56.1) | 1.4 (0.9 to 2.1) | 1.1 (0.5 to 2.1) |
| Farmer | 32.3 (24.6 to 41.0) | 1.1 (0.7 to 1.7) | 1.0 (0.5 to 1.7) |
| Employed | 20.3 (12.0 to 32.1) | 0.6 (0.3 to 1.1) | 0.6 (0.3 to 1.3) |
| Unemployed | 47.0 (26.2 to 68.8) | 1.4 (0.6 to 3.1) | 1.3 (0.5 to 3.5) |
| Others | 27.6 (17.7 to 40.5) | 0.8 (0.4 to 1.4) | 0.6 (0.3 to 1.2) |
| Education level | |||
| High school | 29.7 (22.2 to 38.4) | 1 | 1 |
| Children under 6-yr | 38.5 (29.3 to 48.6) | 0.7 (0.4 to 1.1) | 0.1 (0.1 to 0.6) |
| Elementary school | 35.1 (29.0 to 41.7) | 0.9 (0.6 to 1.3) | 0.7 (0.5 to 1.1) |
| University | 22.0 (12.3 to 36.1) | 0.4 (0.2 to 0.9) | 0.5 (0.2 to 1.2) |
| Illiterate | 33.0 (25.6 to 41.2) | 0.8 (0.5 to 1.3) | 0.7 (0.4 to 1.2) |
| Source of drinking water | |||
| Tap water | 31.6 (26.4 to 37.3) | 1 | 1 |
| Spring or well water | 38.4 (32.6 to 44.6) | 1.3 (1.0 to 1.8) | 1.3 (1.0 to 1.8) * |
| Animal close contact | |||
| No | 32.7 (27.6 to 38.2) | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 34.9 (29.4 to 40.9) | 1.1 (0.8 to 1.4) | 1.0 (0.7 to 1.3) |
| Residency status | |||
| Rural | 34.8 (30.5 to 39.3) | 1 | 1 |
| Urban | 28.6 (20.0 to 39.0) | 0.6 (0.3 to 0.9) | 0.4 (0.2 to 0.7) * |
aCrude odds ratio
bAdjusted odds ratio
*Indicates p < 0.05