Literature DB >> 319068

Increased prescribing of Valium, Librium, and other drugs--an example of the influence of economic and social factors on the practice of medicine.

I Waldron.   

Abstract

Drug prescriptions per capita in the United States have more than doubled since 1950 without a commensurate improvement in health. Drugs are often prescribed for clinical conditions in which therapeutic benefits do not outweigh the risk of adverse drug reactions. Deaths due to adverse drug reactions are roughly as frequent as deaths due to automobile accidents. Valium and Librium are the first and fourth most commonly prescribed drugs in the U.S., used by one ten adults each year. The rapid rise in use of these drugs has occurred during a period of rising social stress, as indicated by increases in alcohol consumption, suicide, and homicide, Valium and Librium are frequently prescribe for patients who go to doctors with social or other nonmedical problems, often in lieu of attempts to resolve these underlying problems. Overprescribing occurs because the decision to prescribe is influenced not only by consideration of therapeutic benefit, but also by nonmedical factors, for example the widespread expectation by both patient and doctor that the doctor will provide a drug or some other technological treatment. Prescribing decisions are also influenced by the profit-motivated activities of drug companies, including the expenditure of almost one-quarter of every sales dollar on drug promotion. The most widely used source of drug information for doctors is the industry-sponsored Physicians' Desk Reference, which overrates the therapeutic value of Valium and Librium as compared to disinterested medical sources. Drug companies also contribute to overprescribing by introducing numerous minor variants of existing drugs. The therapeutic benefits of such new drugs are often overestimated in the early years of use when adverse side effects are not well known and apparent efficacy is enhanced by placebo effects in uncontrolled observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 319068     DOI: 10.2190/FPJT-V9YE-VWM1-UXPA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Serv        ISSN: 0020-7314            Impact factor:   1.663


  8 in total

1.  Social trends in prescribing mood-modifying drugs to women.

Authors:  J Harding
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Physicians investigated for inappropriate prescribing by the Oregon Board of Medical Examiners.

Authors:  L Kofoed; J D Bloom; M H Williams; C Rhyne; M Resnick
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-05

3.  Are benzodiazepines overused and abused?

Authors:  K Rickels
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  The role of global traditional and complementary systems of medicine in treating mental health problems.

Authors:  Oye Gureje; Gareth Nortje; Victor Makanjuola; Bibilola Oladeji; Soraya Seedat; Rachel Jenkins
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 27.083

5.  GPs' attitudes to benzodiazepine and 'Z-drug' prescribing: a barrier to implementation of evidence and guidance on hypnotics.

Authors:  A Niroshan Siriwardena; Zubair Qureshi; Steve Gibson; Sarah Collier; Martin Latham
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Relation between physician characteristics and prescribing for elderly people in New Brunswick.

Authors:  W Davidson; D W Molloy; G Somers; M Bédard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Rational use of benzodiazepines in the elderly.

Authors:  R I Shorr; D W Robin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Beyond Prescriptions Monitoring Programs: The Importance of Having the Conversation about Benzodiazepine Use.

Authors:  Erin Oldenhof; Jane Anderson-Wurf; Kate Hall; Petra K Staiger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.