| Literature DB >> 31906538 |
Wentian Cui1, Kuanghuai Wu1, Xu Cai1, Haizhu Tang1, Wenke Huang1.
Abstract
In recent years, ultra-thin wearing course asphalt mixture has been widely used in the reconstruction of old road surfaces and the functional layer of new road surfaces due to its good road performance. To improve the rutting resistance of ultra-thin wearing course asphalt mixture, this research presents an Ultra-thin Wearing Course-10 (UTWC-10) asphalt mixture with good high-temperature stability and skid resistance based on the Taylor system standard mesh specifications. The Course Aggregate Void Filling (CAVF) method is used to design the UTWC-10 asphalt mixture, which is compared with two other traditional ultra-thin wearing course asphalt mixtures on the basis of different laboratory performance tests. The high-temperature rutting test data shows that the rutting dynamic stability (DS) index of the UTWC-10 asphalt mixture is much higher than that of traditional wearing course asphalt mixtures, as it has better high-temperature stability. Moreover, anti-sliding performance attenuation tests are conducted by a coarse aggregate polishing machine. The wear test results show that the skid resistance of the UTWC-10 asphalt mixture is promising. The anti-sliding performance attenuation test can effectively reflect the skid resistance attenuation trend of asphalt pavement at the long-term vehicle load. It is verified that the designed UTWC-10 asphalt mixture shows excellent high-temperature rutting resistance and skid resistance, as well as better low temperature crack resistance and water stability than the traditional wearing course asphalt mixtures.Entities:
Keywords: functional pavement layer; high-temperature stability; pavement performance test; ultra-thin wearing course asphalt mixture
Year: 2020 PMID: 31906538 PMCID: PMC6981429 DOI: 10.3390/ma13010189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Properties of Aggregates.
| Aggregate | Test Items | Standard Results | Test Results | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5–10 | 3–5 | 0–3 | |||
| Coarse aggregate | Crushed value (%) | ≤26 | 4.9 | 5.3 | - |
| Abrasion value (%) | ≤28 | 6.1 | 6.1 | - | |
| Polished value PSV | ≥42 | 49 | - | - | |
| Needle shape (%) | ≤15 | 3.2 | - | - | |
| Water absorption rate (%) | ≤2.0 | 0.87 | 0.96 | - | |
| Gross bulk density (g/cm3) | - | 2.90 | 2.89 | - | |
| Apparent density (g/cm3) | >2.6 | 2.93 | 2.92 | - | |
| Adhesion to asphalt (level) | ≥5 | 5 | - | - | |
| Fine aggregate | Apparent density (g/cm3) | ≥2.5 | - | - | 2.93 |
| Sand equivalent (%) | ≥60 | - | - | 87 | |
| Methylene blue value (g/kg) | ≤25 | - | - | 14 | |
Properties of asphalt binder.
| Test Items | Unit | Standard Results | Test Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penetration index (25 °C) | 0.1 mm | 40–80 | 43.1 |
| Softening Point TR&B | °C | ≥70 | 81.6 |
| Ductility (5 °C) | cm | ≥20 | 29 |
| Relative density of asphalt | g/cm3 | - | 1.023 |
| Rotational viscosity 135 °C | Pa·s | - | 2.958 |
| Flexible recovery 25 °C | % | ≥85 | 92 |
| Rotating film oven test (163 °C) | |||
| Quality loss | % | ≤0.6 | 0.09 |
| Penetration ratio | % | ≥65 | 79 |
| Ductility 5 °C | cm | ≥15 | 20 |
Properties of mineral filler.
| Test Items | Unit | Standard Results | Test Results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apparent relative density | g/cm3 | ≥2.5 | 2.864 | |
| Hydrophilic coefficient | — | <1 | 0.6 | |
| Plasticity index | — | <4 | 1 | |
| Water content | % | ≥1 | 0.08 | |
| Particle size range | <0.6 mm | % | 100 | 100 |
| <0.15 mm | % | 90–100 | 99.1 | |
| <0.075 mm | % | 70–100 | 97.7 | |
Figure 1Design process of three asphalt mixtures.
Figure 2Flow chart of the durability test of three asphalt mixtures.
The gradation compositions of the three asphalt mixtures.
| Gradation Type | Passing Rate (%) under Different Mesh Apertures (mm) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.2 | 9.5 | 8 | 6.7 | 4.75 | 2.36 | 1.18 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.15 | 0.075 | |
| Novachip-B | 100 | 97.6 | - | - | 32.5 | 25.3 | 17.6 | 13.9 | 9.8 | 7.5 | 5.6 |
| OGFC-7 | 100 | 100 | - | 98.3 | 86.2 | 20.3 | 16.8 | 15.4 | 12.3 | 10.0 | 6.4 |
| UTWC-10 | 100 | 98.8 | 96.5 | 87.7 | 34.0 | 27.8 | 23.3 | 16 | 11.4 | 7.7 | 5 |
Figure 3The gradation curves of the three asphalt mixtures.
The volume parameters of thea three asphalt mixtures.
| Asphalt Mixture Type | Optimal Asphalt Content (%) | Void Ratio (%) | VMA (%) | VFA (%) | Stability (kN) | Flow Value (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTWC-10 | 5.0 | 12.1 | 21.9 | 44.7 | 8.64 | 27.4 |
| Novachip-B | 5.0 | 12.3 | 22.4 | 43.5 | 8.43 | 32.1 |
| OGFC-7 | 4.5 | 20.3 | 28.3 | 28.3 | 6.80 | 38.5 |
The volume parameters of UTWC-10.
| Asphalt Content (%) | Void Ratio (%) | VMA (%) | VFA (%) | Stability (kN) | Flow Value (mm) | Asphalt Film Thickness (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.4 | 14.1 | 23.6 | 40.1 | 6.69 | 27.0 | 7.6 |
| 4.7 | 13.3 | 23.5 | 43.4 | 7.40 | 32.3 | 8.7 |
| 5.0 | 12.1 | 21.9 | 44.7 | 8.64 | 27.4 | 10.3 |
| 5.3 | 11.3 | 21.5 | 47.4 | 7.25 | 30.7 | 11.1 |
| 5.6 | 11.0 | 21.2 | 48.1 | 6.30 | 34.4 | 12.3 |
The leakage test results of UTWC-10.
| Sample Number | Mixture Quality (g) | Adhesive Quality (g) | Leakage Loss (%) | Average Leakage Rate (%) | Test Temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1000.8 | 0.84 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 185 |
| 2 | 1000.1 | 0.77 | 0.08 | ||
| 3 | 1000.3 | 0.91 | 0.09 | ||
| 4 | 1000.1 | 0.72 | 0.07 |
The volume parameters of Novachip-B.
| Asphalt Content (%) | Void Ratio (%) | VMA (%) | VFA (%) | Stability (kN) | Flow Value (mm) | Asphalt Film Thickness (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.4 | 15.2 | 25.3 | 40.4 | 6.72 | 33.4 | 8.1 |
| 4.7 | 13.4 | 24.6 | 42.3 | 7.51 | 31.5 | 9.3 |
| 5.0 | 12.3 | 22.4 | 43.5 | 8.43 | 32.1 | 10.5 |
| 5.3 | 11.6 | 22.1 | 45.9 | 7.38 | 30.8 | 11.6 |
| 5.6 | 11.1 | 21.7 | 47.2 | 6.67 | 33.6 | 12.8 |
The leakage test results of Novachip-B.
| Sample Number | Mixture Quality (g) | Adhesive Quality (g) | Leakage Loss (%) | Average Leakage Rate (%) | Test Temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1000.1 | 0.71 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 185 |
| 2 | 1000.4 | 0.93 | 0.09 | ||
| 3 | 1000.6 | 1.14 | 0.11 | ||
| 4 | 1000.3 | 0.82 | 0.08 |
The volume parameters of OGFC-7.
| Asphalt Content (%) | Leakage Loss (%) | Scattering Loss (%) | Void Ratio (%) | VMA (%) | VFA (%) | Stability (kN) | Flow Value (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | 0.08 | 24.87 | 24.8 | 27.7 | 25.4 | 5.82 | 34.8 |
| 4.2 | 0.11 | 19.12 | 22 | 28.1 | 26.7 | 6.53 | 36.8 |
| 4.5 | 0.17 | 13.88 | 20.3 | 28.3 | 28.3 | 6.80 | 38.5 |
| 4.8 | 0.33 | 13.29 | 19 | 28.6 | 30.5 | 5.41 | 41.2 |
| 5.1 | 0.47 | 11.6 | 18.3 | 29.1 | 32.9 | 5.07 | 40.3 |
Figure 4Wheel tracking tests instrument.
Figure 5Freeze-thaw splitting test.
Figure 6Wear test system: (a) coarse aggregate polishing machine; (b) ultra-thin wearing course specimen.
The high-temperature rutting test results of the three asphalt mixtures.
| Gradation | 45 min Deformation (mm) | 60 min Deformation (mm) | Deformation Difference (mm) | DS (times/mm) | Mean Value of DS (times/mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTWC-10 | 1.26 | 1.38 | 0.12 | 5250.00 | 5568 |
| 1.30 | 1.41 | 0.11 | 5727.27 | ||
| 1.28 | 1.39 | 0.11 | 5727.27 | ||
| Novachip-B | 1.47 | 1.63 | 0.16 | 3937.5 | 4025 |
| 1.51 | 1.66 | 0.15 | 4200.00 | ||
| 1.49 | 1.65 | 0.16 | 3937.5 | ||
| OGFC-7 | 2.10 | 2.30 | 0.20 | 3150.00 | 3150 |
| 2.13 | 2.33 | 0.21 | 2985.78 | ||
| 2.15 | 2.34 | 0.19 | 3314.22 |
Figure 7The various performance indexes of the three asphalt mixtures: (a) relationship between the bending strain and temperature; (b) relationship between the bending strength and temperature; and (c) relationship between the bending stiffness modulus and temperature.
Figure 8The average residual stability of the three asphalt mixtures.
Freeze-thaw splitting test results of three asphalt mixtures.
| Asphalt Mixture Type | Original Splitting Strength (R1)/MPa | Freeze-thaw Splitting Strength (R2)/MPa | Strength Ratio | Standard Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTWC-10 | 0.765 | 0.706 | 92.3% | ≥80% |
| Novachip-B | 0.757 | 0.684 | 90.4% | |
| OGFC-7 | 0.543 | 0.469 | 86.4% |
Figure 9The texture depths of the three asphalt mixtures.
Figure 10The anti-sliding performance attenuation curves of the three asphalt mixtures.