| Literature DB >> 31906529 |
Ibrahim A A Mohamed1,2, Nesma Shalby1,2, Chenyang Bai1, Meng Qin1, Ramadan A Agami2, Kuai Jie1, Bo Wang1, Guangsheng Zhou1.
Abstract
The negative effects of salt stress vary among different rapeseed cultivars. In this study, we investigated the sodium chloride tolerance among 10 rapeseed cultivars based on membership function values (MFV) and Euclidean cluster analyses by exposing seedlings to 0, 100, or 200 mM NaCl. The NaCl toxicity significantly reduced growth, biomass, endogenous K+ levels, relative water content and increased electrolyte leakage, soluble sugar levels, proline levels, and antioxidant enzyme activities. SPAD values were highly variable among rapeseed cultivars. We identified three divergent (tolerant, moderately tolerant, and sensitive) groups. We found that Hua6919 and Yunyoushuang2 were the most salt-tolerant cultivars and that Zhongshuang11 and Yangyou9 were the most salt-sensitive cultivars. The rapeseed cultivars were further subjected to photosynthetic gas exchange and anatomical trait analyses. Among the photosynthetic gas exchange and anatomical traits, the stomatal aperture was the most highly correlated with salinity tolerance in rapeseed cultivars and thus, is important for future studies that aim to improve salinity tolerance in rapeseed. Thus, we identified and characterized two salt-tolerant cultivars that will be useful for breeding programs that aim to develop salt-tolerant rapeseed.Entities:
Keywords: Brassica napus; antioxidant enzymes; cluster analysis; growth; salinity; stomata
Year: 2020 PMID: 31906529 PMCID: PMC7020420 DOI: 10.3390/plants9010062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1The symptoms of seedlings after 28 days grown under control (A,B; without NaCl) and 200 mM NaCl treatment (C,D); A and C: Hua6919 cultivar; B and D: Zhongshuang11 cultivar. bars = 10 cm.
Means of salt tolerance coefficients * based on growth and biomass parameters in B. napes cultivars.
| Cultivars | PH | TLA | NL | SFW | RFW | SDW | RDW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhongshuang11 | 71.7 | 39.1 | 77.8 | 41.5 | 48.9 | 45.7 | 46.2 |
| Yangyou9 | 69.2 | 45.6 | 70.5 | 47.2 | 57.1 | 48.2 | 44.3 |
| Hua6919 | 82.9 | 57.4 | 88.2 | 52.7 | 66.8 | 74.3 | 65.7 |
| Xiangyouza553 | 73.8 | 48.8 | 71.4 | 49.1 | 49.1 | 52.3 | 49.7 |
| Yangza11 | 80.2 | 44.5 | 70.3 | 42.6 | 53.1 | 49.1 | 50.4 |
| Fengyou520 | 88.5 | 60.6 | 77.1 | 54.2 | 62.6 | 72.3 | 61.7 |
| Huashuang5 | 76.7 | 53.7 | 78.2 | 48.3 | 62.1 | 64.2 | 52.8 |
| Ningza27 | 71.2 | 43.8 | 71.5 | 37.6 | 54.7 | 52.2 | 53.0 |
| Rongyou18 | 77.5 | 49.5 | 86.2 | 47.4 | 57.6 | 60.1 | 53.7 |
| Yunyoushuang2 | 83.5 | 56.9 | 89.1 | 53.2 | 65.2 | 65.5 | 57.6 |
* Means of salt tolerance coefficients were defended as the average of the observations under two salt stresses divided by the means of the controls and expressed as a percentage. PH; plant height, TLA; total leaves area, NL; number of leaves, SFW; shoot fresh weight, RFW; root fresh weight, SDW; shoot dry weight, RDW; root dry weight.
Means of salt tolerance coefficients * based on physiological and biochemical traits in B. napes cultivars
| Cultivars | SPAD | K+ | TSS | ProC | RWC | EL | SOD | CAT | APX | POD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhongshuang11 | 100 | 16.2 | 134 | 147 | 76.5 | 190.6 | 149 | 159 | 103 | 135 |
| Yangyou9 | 85 | 15.9 | 130 | 159 | 77.0 | 173.1 | 180 | 141 | 94 | 144 |
| Hua6919 | 119 | 25.6 | 158 | 177 | 88.2 | 121.0 | 245 | 177 | 121 | 182 |
| Xiangyouza553 | 96 | 15.8 | 134 | 172 | 81.0 | 184.8 | 165 | 137 | 105 | 128 |
| Yangza11 | 104 | 17.5 | 134 | 169 | 80.2 | 139.1 | 176 | 143 | 94 | 133 |
| Fengyou520 | 129 | 22.9 | 159 | 202 | 84.7 | 170.1 | 192 | 195 | 100 | 193 |
| Huashuang5 | 115 | 23.9 | 145 | 197 | 84.6 | 189.2 | 130 | 138 | 116 | 179 |
| Ningza27 | 111 | 19.9 | 126 | 179 | 84.3 | 187.5 | 164 | 144 | 120 | 136 |
| Rongyou18 | 120 | 21.5 | 139 | 189 | 83.9 | 144.4 | 174 | 183 | 112 | 154 |
| Yunyoushuang2 | 121 | 24.9 | 153 | 199 | 86.7 | 132.4 | 232 | 172 | 120 | 186 |
* Means of salt tolerance coefficients ware defended as the average of the observations under two salt stresses divided by the means of the controls and expressed as a percentage. SPAD; total chlorophyll, K+; potassium concentration, TSS; total soluble sugar, ProC; proline concentration, RWC relative water content, El; electrolyte leakage, SOD; superoxide dismutase, CAT; catalase, APX; ascorbate peroxidase, POD; peroxidase.
Figure 2Dendrogram from cluster analysis for salinity tolerance showing the classification of 10 B. napus L. cultivars based on the membership function value (MFV) of morpho-physiological and biochemical indices into three groups. Values surrounded by parenthesis is the mean of MFV of each cultivar listed after the cultivar name.
Means of salt tolerance coefficient * of net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), and stomatal conductance (Gs), stomata aperture area (SAA), and stomatal density (SD) in B. napes cultivars.
| Cultivars | Pn | Tr | Gs | SAA | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhongshuang11 | 43.6 | 43.6 | 32.2 | 26.0 | 129.2 |
| Yangyou9 | 53.1 | 48.2 | 47.0 | 36.5 | 123.6 |
| Hua6919 | 75.6 | 74.7 | 67.3 | 77.4 | 123.0 |
| Xiangyouza553 | 45.0 | 42.9 | 33.8 | 48.8 | 124.8 |
| Yangza11 | 44.5 | 49.4 | 38.3 | 40.8 | 122.8 |
| Fengyou520 | 54.4 | 55.2 | 41.2 | 52.2 | 116.4 |
| Huashuang5 | 63.8 | 66.8 | 52.4 | 55.8 | 112.1 |
| Ningza27 | 50.6 | 51.6 | 45.9 | 46.7 | 135.8 |
| Rongyou18 | 64.8 | 60.6 | 54.7 | 50.9 | 117.2 |
| Yunyoushuang2 | 74.3 | 66.6 | 55.6 | 64.9 | 119.5 |
* Means of salt tolerance coefficients (indexes) ware defended as the average of the observations under two salt stresses divided by the means of the controls and expressed as a percentage.
Figure 3Photographs of B. napus L. leaf abaxial surface grown under different salt stress levels. (A) Hua6919; (B) Yunyoushuang2; (C) Yangyou9; (D) Zhongshuang11 cultivar; S0 (0 mM NaCl); S1 (100 mM NaCl); S2 (200 mM NaCl); gc, guard cells; sc, subsidiary cells, bar = 25 μm.
Figure 4Pearson’s correlation among salt tolerance coefficients based on the different parameters from 10 B. napes cultivars exposed to different salt stress levels (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl). Each circle indicates the Pearson’s correlation coefficient of a pair of parameters. MFV; mean of MFV, PH; plant height, TLA; total leaves area, NL; number of leaves, SFW; shoot fresh weight, RFW; root fresh weight, SDW; shoot dry weight, RDW; root dry weight, K+; potassium concentration, ProC; proline concentration, TSS; total soluble sugar, RWC; relative water content. EL; electrolyte leakage, SOD; superoxide dismutase, APX; ascorbate peroxidase, CAT; catalase, POD; peroxidase, (Pn; net photosynthetic rate, Tr; transpiration rate, and Gs; stomatal conductance, SAA; stomata aperture area, and SD; stomatal density). * and **; Correlation is significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively.