| Literature DB >> 31906389 |
Ilya Okulov1,2, Ivan Soldatov3,4, Ivan Kaban3, Baran Sarac5, Florian Spieckermann6, Jürgen Eckert5,6.
Abstract
Flash Joule-heating was applied to the Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 metallic glass for designing fully crystalline metastable nanocomposites consisting of the metastable B2 CuZr and low-temperature equilibrium Cu10Zr7 phases. The onset of crystallization was in situ controlled by monitoring resistivity changes in the samples. The effect of heating rate and annealing time on the volume fraction of the crystalline phases and mechanical properties of the nanocomposites was studied in detail. Particularly, an increase of the heating rate and a decrease of the annealing time lead to a lower number of equilibrium Cu10Zr7 precipitates and an increase of tensile ductility. Tailoring of these non-equilibrium microstructures and mechanical properties may not be possible unless one starts with a fully glassy material that opens new perspectives for designing metastable nanomaterials with unique physical properties.Entities:
Keywords: flash annealing; mechanical behaviour; metallic glass; metastable material; nanocomposite
Year: 2020 PMID: 31906389 PMCID: PMC7022490 DOI: 10.3390/nano10010084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic continuous heating transformation (CHT) diagram of the Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 metallic glass based on [20].
Microstructural characteristics of the Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 metallic glass samples rapidly annealed until the resistivity drop.
| Sample | Current Density (MA m−2) | Estimated Heating Rate (K s−1) | Annealing Time | Volume Fraction of B2 CuZr (vol.%) | Volume Fraction of Cu10Zr7 (vol.%) | Number of Cu10Zr7 Particles (mm−2) | Size of Cu10Zr7 Particles (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2-98 | 59 ± 5 | ≥830 | Until resistivity drop | 98 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 1.1 × 104 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.3 |
| B2-83 | 44 ± 5 | ≥330 | 83 ± 3 | 17 ± 3 | 22.0 × 104 ± 0.7 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | |
| B2-59 | 34 ± 5 | ≥150 | 59 ± 5 | 41 ± 5 | 61.2 × 104 ± 1.5 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | |
| B2-27 | 34 ± 5 | ≥150 | 1.6 s after resistivity drop | 27 ± 4 | 73 ± 4 | 146.9 × 104 ± 2.8 | 1.2 ± 0.2 |
| B2-11 | 34 ± 5 | ≥150 | 2.2 s after resistivity drop | 11 ± 3 | 89 ± 3 | 169.5 × 104 ± 2.1 | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
Figure 2Effect of heating rate on the microstructure of flash annealed Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 metallic glass. XRD patterns (a–c) and secondary electron SEM micrographs (d–f) of the Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 metallic glass samples rapidly annealed by Joule heating (up to the resistivity drop) with the following current densities: (a,d) 34 ± 5 MA m−2; (b,e) 44 ± 5 MA m−2; and (c,f) and 59 ± 5 MA m−2. (Figure 2d is adopted from [20]).
Figure 3Effect of annealing time on the microstructure of flash annealed Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 metallic glass. X-ray diffractograms (a–c) and secondary electron micrographs (d–f) of the Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 metallic glass samples rapidly annealed by Joule heating at the current density i3 = 34 ± 5 MA m−2 and different times: (a,d) until the resistivity drop; (b,e) 1.6 s after the resistivity drop; and (c,f) 2.2 s after the resistivity drop. (Figure 3d is adopted from [20]).
Figure 4Schematic illustration of annealing conditions of the samples selected for the current study. Nucleation and growth rate curves are drawn based on reference [41].
Figure 5Room temperature tensile true stress-true strain curves of the Cu10Zr7 dendrite/B2 nano- and microcomposites obtained by flash annealing the Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 metallic glass. (a) Annealed at 34 ± 5 MA m−2 until 1.6 s after the onset of the resistivity drop; (b) annealed at 34 ± 5 MA m−2 until the resistivity drop; (c) annealed at 44 ± 5 MA m−2 until the resistivity drop; and (d) annealed at 59 ± 5 MA m−2 until resistivity drop. The values at the end of the stress-strain curves indicate the volume fraction of the Cu10Zr7 dendrites. (Stress-strain curve “d” is adopted from [20]).
Mechanical properties of the Cu10Zr7 dendrite/B2 nano- and microcomposites obtained by flash annealing the Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 metallic glass.
| Sample | Yield Strength (MPa) | Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa) | Young’s Modulus (GPa) | Strain to Fracture (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2-27 | 1440 ± 30 | 1580 ± 50 | 94.9 ± 0.6 | 1.8 ± 0.2 |
| B2-59 | 1220 ± 30 | 1670 ± 50 | 94.3 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.1 |
| B2-83 | 980 ± 30 | 1710 ± 50 | 87.2 ± 0.4 | 7.5 ± 0.5 |
| B2-98 | 700 ± 30 | 1320 ± 50 | 79.5 ± 0.8 | 7.1 ± 0.5 |