| Literature DB >> 31906342 |
Jingxia Zheng1, Yanting Xie1, Yingying Wei1, Yongzhen Yang1, Xuguang Liu1,2, Yongkang Chen1,3, Bingshe Xu1.
Abstract
To greatly improve the production quality and efficiency ofEntities:
Keywords: green carbon quantum dots; high fluorescent quantum yield; high product yield; white LEDs
Year: 2020 PMID: 31906342 PMCID: PMC7022538 DOI: 10.3390/nano10010082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the synthesis of green carbon quantum dots (g-CQDs) and their application in white light emitting diodes (white).
Product yield (PY) and quantum yield (QY) values of green carbon quantum dots (g-CQDs) under different reaction conditions.
| V(EDA)/mL | Reaction Temperature/°C | Reaction Duration/h | PY/% | QY/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 180 | 12 | 0.60 | 5.29 |
| 2 | 88.58 | 41.07 | ||
| 4 | 70.90 | 62.98 | ||
| 8 | 51.60 | 36.22 | ||
| 4 | 160 | 12 | 21.15 | 15.07 |
| 180 | 70.90 | 62.98 | ||
| 200 | 50.50 | 43.05 | ||
| 4 | 180 | 10 | 34.90 | 25.42 |
| 12 | 70.90 | 62.98 | ||
| 14 | 37.10 | 24.02 |
A comparison of the QY and PY of g-CQDs synthesised by different materials and methods.
| Year | Experimental Materials | Synthesis Methods | PY/% | QY/% | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 3,4,9,10-tetranitroperylene | solvothermal | - | 80 | [ |
| 2018 | citric acid, N-(2-aminoethyl)-3- | solvothermal | 49 | [ | |
| 2018 | urea, aniline, ethylenediamine | hydrothermal | - | 2.46 | [ |
| 2017 | citric acid, N-(β-aminoethyl)-γ-aminopropyl trimethoxysilane (AEAPMS) | solvothermal | - | 16.4 | [ |
| 2015 | L-valine, H3PO4 (85%) | solvothermal | - | 44.8 | [ |
| 2014 | citric acid, urea | solvothermal | - | 36 | [ |
| 2014 | ammonium citrate, ammonium hydroxide, H2O2 | hydrothermal | 34 | 16.5 | [ |
| 2013 | phytic acid, ethylenediamine | microwave oven | - | 21.65 | [ |
| 2018 | 2,7-dihydroxynaphthalene, ethylenediamine, H2O2 | solvothermal | 70.90 | 62.98 | this article |
Figure 2(a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image and (b) size distribution of g-CQDs, inset of (a) is the high resolution TEM image. (V(EDA) = 4 mL, T = 180 °C, Dr = 12 h).
Figure 3X-ray diffraction of g-CQDs (V(EDA) = 4 mL, T = 180 °C, Dr = 12 h).
Figure 4Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of the g-CQDs (V(EDA) = 4 mL, T = 180 °C, Dr = 12 h).
Figure 5(a) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum of the g-CQDs, and (b–d) are the corresponding extended peaks of C1s, N1s and O1s, respectively (V(EDA) = 4 mL, T = 180 °C, Dr = 12 h).
Elemental analysis results of the g-CQDs (V(EDA) = 4 mL, T = 180 °C, Dr = 12 h).
| Sample | N | C | H | O |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| g-CQDs/% | 20.31 | 55.15 | 5.44 | 19.10 |
Figure 6(a) UV–Vis absorption spectrum and excitation spectrum of g-CQD solution; (b) fluorescence spectra of g-CQD solution at different excitation wavelengths (V(EDA) = 4 mL, T = 180 °C, Dr = 12 h).
Figure 7Fluorescence decay curve of g-CQDs (V(EDA) = 4 mL, T = 180 °C, Dr = 12 h).
Double-exponential fitting parameters of the g-CQD solution (V(EDA) =4 mL, T = 180 °C, Dr = 12 h).
| Sample | α1 | τ1 (ns) | α2 | τ2 (ns) | χ2 | <τ> (ns) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g-CQDs | 0.28 | 2.18 | 0.72 | 7.68 | 1.28 | 7.13 |
Figure 8The red–green–blue spectral composition of g-CQDs (V(EDA) = 4 mL, T = 180 °C, Dr = 12 h).
Figure 9Schematic diagram of (a) the structure of white LEDs based on g-CQDs (V(EDA) = 4 mL, T = 180 °C, Dr = 12 h); (b) emission spectrum of the single blue light chip and white LEDs; (c) CIE chromaticity diagram of white LEDs, inset is the photo of white LEDs.
Comparison of LEDs fabricated by the blue chip and different g-CQDs and other phosphors.
| Products | PY/% | QY/% | λex/nm | λem/nm | WLEDs | References | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phosphor | CIE Coordinates | CRI | CCT | ||||||
| CDs | - | 16.5 | 400 | 500 | CDs + CaAlSiN3:Eu2+ | (0.382, 0.391) | 86.9 | 3863 | [ |
| SiCDs | - | - | 450 | 524 | SiCDs | (0.3353, 0.5647) | - | - | [ |
| G-CDs | - | 80 | 460 | 508 | G-CDs/MTES + | (0.4046, 0.4028) | 92.9 | 3610 | [ |
| g-CDs | - | 14 | 405 | 522 | g-CDs@MMT | (0.46, 0.49) | - | 3232 | [ |
| (CdSe)x(ZnS)1−x | - | 54 | 365 | 517 | (CdSe)x(ZnS)1−x + | (0.437, 0.432) | 65.5 | 3220 | [ |
| Sr7.95Si4O12Cl8: | - | 81 | 395 | 500–557 | Sr7.95Si4O12Cl8:0.05 | ~ | 90.3 | ~ | [ |
| g-CQDs | 70.90 | 62.98 | 460 | 513 | g-CQDs | (0.45, 0.37) | 87 | 2520 | this article |
MTES: methyltriethoxysilane; APTES: 3-triethoxysilylpropylamine; “~” refers to variable.