| Literature DB >> 31906081 |
Norhisam Misron1,2, Nisa Syakirah Kamal Azhar1, Mohd Nizar Hamidon1,2, Ishak Aris1, Kunihisa Tashiro3, Hirokazu Nagata4.
Abstract
There are many factors affecting oil extraction rate (OER) but a large contributor to high national OER is by processing good-quality fresh fruit bunches (FFB) at the mills. The current practice for grading oil palm fruit bunches in mills is using human graders for visual inspection, which can lead to repeated mistakes, inconsistent evaluation results, and many other related losses. This study aims to develop a fruit maturity sensor that can detect oil palm fruit maturity grade and send indication to the user whether to accept or reject the bunches. This study focuses on fruit battery principle and applying the charging concept to the fruit battery in order to generate significant load voltage readings of oil palm fruit battery. The charging process resulted in amplified load voltage readings, which were 4 times more sensitive to changes as compared to normal fruit battery without charging process. From the load voltage readings, the fruits can be characterized into their maturity grade based on moisture content. It was determined that fruits with moisture content less than 44% and average load voltage, Vavg, between 20 to 30 mV are considered ripe fruits.Entities:
Keywords: fruit battery; fruit maturity; load voltage; moisture content; oil palm; sensor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31906081 PMCID: PMC6983112 DOI: 10.3390/s20010226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Procedure of oil palm fresh fruit bunches’ (FFB) processing at mills.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of oil palm fruit battery electrochemical cell.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of fruit battery circuit with charging concept.
Figure 4Structure of sensor head.
MPOB oil palm fruit maturity grading standard [20].
| Fruit Maturity Grade | Unripe | Under Ripe | Ripe | Over Ripe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fruitlet Surface Color | Black to dark purple | Dark brown to dark orange | Dark red to yellow–orange | Orange |
| Loose Fruits on Ground | 0 | 0 to 5 | >10 | >50% of fruit |
| Loose Fruit Sockets on Bunch | 0 | <10 | >10 | >50% of fruit |
| Fruit Mesocarp Color | Yellow | Yellow–orange | Yellow–orange | Yellow–orange |
Figure 5Photograph of experimental setup.
Figure 6Electrode sensor position on the fruit surface.
Figure 7Load resistance voltage characteristics of fruit battery with and without charging process.
Figure 8Performance comparison between charging and without charging process.
Figure 9Methods to characterize load resistance voltage readings.
Characteristics of various fruit maturity grade.
| Maturity Grade | Characteristics | Values | FFB Appearance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unripe |
| 13.0 | 19.9 | 86.9 |
|
| Under Ripe |
| 24.9 | 39.0 | 59.0 |
|
| Ripe 1 |
| 29.3 | 48.9 | 44.0 |
|
| Ripe 2 |
| 17.4 | 27.2 | 24.6 |
|
Figure 10Relationship between moisture content and load resistance voltage. (a) Maximum voltage characteristic; (b) average voltage characteristic.