Literature DB >> 31905592

Prevalence of microplastics in animal-based traditional medicinal materials: Widespread pollution in terrestrial environments.

Shibo Lu1, Rong Qiu1, Jiani Hu1, Xinyu Li1, Yingxin Chen1, Xiaoting Zhang1, Chengjin Cao1, Huahong Shi2, Bing Xie1, Wei-Min Wu3, Defu He4.   

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs) pollution is an emerging environmental and health concern. MPs have been extensively observed in the aquatic environment, yet rarely investigated in the terrestrial ecosystem, especially in relation to health risks. To evaluate potential MPs pollution in land-dwelling animal medicine materials, we collected 20 types of small animal-based medicinal materials and 10 types of available fresh terrestrial animals from eight different regions in China. MPs were found in all medicinal materials with an average incidence rate of 94.67%. The abundance of MPs was in the range of 1.80 ± 0.38 to 7.80 ± 0.83 items/individual or 1.59 ± 0.33 to 43.56 ± 9.22 items/g (dry weight), with polymer distribution by polyethylene terephthalate (40.45%), rayon (30.64%), polyethylene (10.11%), nylon (7.35%), polypropylene (5.93%), and polyvinyl chloride (5.52%). The majority of MPs were microfibers (84.68%), with 15.32% of fragments. Moreover, MPs were directly observed in the intestine, detected in all ten types of fresh medicinal animals with the abundance of 0.83 ± 0.35 to 3.42 ± 0.46 items/individual. Furthermore, significant positive correlations (R: 0.32-0.99, p < 0.05) of MPs characteristics were found between medicinal materials and fresh animals, including shape, size, color, and polymer distribution of MPs. The results support that MPs in the medicinal materials were likely derived from living animals. This study demonstrates the prevalence of MPs in animal-based, traditional medicinal materials, and also suggests widespread MPs pollution in terrestrial environments and latent health risks.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Insects; Medicinal animals; Microplastics; Terrestrial environments; Traditional medicinal materials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31905592     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

Review 1.  Microplastics in Food: A Review on Analytical Methods and Challenges.

Authors:  Jung-Hwan Kwon; Jin-Woo Kim; Thanh Dat Pham; Abhrajyoti Tarafdar; Soonki Hong; Sa-Ho Chun; Sang-Hwa Lee; Da-Young Kang; Ju-Yang Kim; Su-Bin Kim; Jaehak Jung
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Microplastics and Their Impact on Reproduction-Can we Learn From the C. elegans Model?

Authors:  Elysia Jewett; Gareth Arnott; Lisa Connolly; Nandini Vasudevan; Eva Kevei
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 3.  Impact of coronavirus pandemic litters on microfiber pollution-effect of personal protective equipment and disposable face masks.

Authors:  R Rathinamoorthy; S Raja Balasaraswathi
Journal:  Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran)       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.519

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.