Literature DB >> 31905462

Improving the Patient-Physician Relationship in the Digital Era - Transformation From Subjective Questionnaires Into Objective Real-Time and Patient-Specific Data Reporting Tools.

Nicolai Maldaner1, Atman Desai2, Oliver P Gautschi3, Luca Regli4, John K Ratliff2, Jon Park2, Martin N Stienen2,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31905462      PMCID: PMC6944997          DOI: 10.14245/ns.1938400.200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurospine        ISSN: 2586-6591


× No keyword cloud information.
To the editor The patient-physician relationship is the foundation of patient care and of paramount importance in order to gather information, establish diagnoses, and create treatment plans. Over the last century, we have seen continuous advances in neurosurgery, while the physician-patient interaction has remained conservatively “untouched.” With upcoming digital technologies, however, the dynamic between patients and physicians might undergo a similarly profound transformation. Traditionally, encounters between patients and physicians are reduced to single events, where a patient’s physical and emotional conditions are reviewed. It is commonly perceived as progressive if standardized electronic health records (EHR) using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are employed outside clinical studies [1]. There are important limitations inherent to this practice. First, condensing key symptoms such as pain or disability to a PROM questionnaire does not account for daily or even hourly fluctuations, therefore representing a radical loss in data granularity. Second, filling out questionnaires means a lot of effort to patients who, in turn, are usually unaware of the results. This does not promote compliance in an era of patient-centered healthcare. Fortunately, the ongoing digitalization of the healthcare sector provides us with the fundamental tools to collect and sophistically analyze “digital biomarkers” that can be used to construct longitudinal, accurate and intelligible medical profiles based on objective patient data. Examples for this endeavor include the continuous activity tracking before and after elective spine surgery with a low-cost consumer grade wearable accelerometer, or a spine-specific smartphone application that reports objective functional impairment by repeated GPS-based 6-minute walking tests (6WT) before and after conservative or operative treatment for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine (http://clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03977961,NCT04062942) [2,3]. These tools allow our patients to self-determine their functional ability within an environment that matters most to them (e.g., home/work). By collecting relevant self-measured outcome data, patients are empowered to take a greater degree of responsibility as an equal partner in their care [4]. The selection of objective outcome measures like daily step counts (accelerometer) or distance walked within a fixed time frame (6WT) are metrics that are relevant and understandable, a clear advantage over a constructed questionnaire score. As some of the tools provide analysis functions and immediate feedback (e.g., color coding, similar to traffic signals), patients are entitled to appreciate changes in their health condition over time, be it positive or negative. To improve the engagement of the patient with his/her physician and with these functional assessments, we must rigorously validate the quality of new objective self-measurements and we must present them in fashion both useful and comprehensible to patients and physicians. Information collected by healthcare professionals (e.g., lab results/physiological parameters) could be send to a patient’s smartphone or tablet to be discussed during ward round or consultation [5]. At the same time, we have to improve the way patients can communicate their collected health data (e.g., step count/pain) and integrate it into the EHR to ultimately be relevant for shared decision-making. As a precondition, both patients and physicians need to be confident that the highly sensitive personal data is protected against theft and abuse. In conclusion, modern patients increasingly demand control over their healthcare, disease-management and outcome measures. Involving patients more actively by means of digital technology has the potential to improve both diagnostics and treatment, lower overall health expenditures, and further empower the patient into a true care partnership with his physician. While embracing the potentials of these new technologies, physicians have to communicate their expectations and rationales to successfully shape those new pathways of care. We would like to encourage physicians to appreciate the ongoing digital transformation as a trend that has the potential to ultimately strengthen the patient-physician relationship.
  4 in total

1.  Why Physicians Should Trust in Patients.

Authors:  Rachel Grob; Gwen Darien; David Meyers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Building an electronic health record integrated quality of life outcomes registry for spine surgery.

Authors:  Tej D Azad; Maziyar Kalani; Terrill Wolf; Alisa Kearney; Yohan Lee; Lisa Flannery; David Chen; Ryan Berroya; Matthew Eisenberg; Jon Park; Lawrence Shuer; Alison Kerr; John K Ratliff
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-10-02

3.  Reliability of the 6-minute walking test smartphone application.

Authors:  Martin N Stienen; Oliver P Gautschi; Victor E Staartjes; Nicolai Maldaner; Marketa Sosnova; Allen L Ho; Anand Veeravagu; Atman Desai; Corinna C Zygourakis; Jon Park; Luca Regli; John K Ratliff
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2019-09-13

4.  Web-based audiovisual patient information system--a study of preoperative patient information in a neurosurgical department.

Authors:  Oliver P Gautschi; Martin N Stienen; Christel Hermann; Dieter Cadosch; Jean-Yves Fournier; Gerhard Hildebrandt
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 2.216

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Expanding the indications for measurement of objective functional impairment in spine surgery: A pilot study of four patients with diseases affecting the spinal cord.

Authors:  Gregor Fischer; Vincens Kälin; Oliver P Gautschi; Oliver Bozinov; Martin N Stienen
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-07-20

Review 2.  XR (Extended Reality: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality) Technology in Spine Medicine: Status Quo and Quo Vadis.

Authors:  Tadatsugu Morimoto; Takaomi Kobayashi; Hirohito Hirata; Koji Otani; Maki Sugimoto; Masatsugu Tsukamoto; Tomohito Yoshihara; Masaya Ueno; Masaaki Mawatari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.