Literature DB >> 31905336

Important Considerations for Design and Implementation of Decision Aids for Shared Medical Decision Making.

Sean Koon1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Decision aids are software or paper-based tools that enable patients and health care practitioners to work together to make optimal treatment decisions. Although there are decades of favorable research for the use of decision aids, there is wide variation in their development and implementation.
OBJECTIVE: To review the literature and provide a summary of best practices for the design, implementation, and assessment of decision aids.
METHODS: A literature search and screening process was employed with a focus on systematic review articles. The resulting articles were synthesized and summarized into recommendations regarding the optimal design, implementation, and appraisal of shared decision-making tools.
RESULTS: Designers of decision aids should initially focus on engagement by involving health care practitioners and patients to ensure the decision aids are pertinent to the situation and not perceived as time consuming. The International Patient Decision Aids Standards help ensure quality in design. Patients should be able to select information in a manner that suits them and view it in a way that allows them to evaluate trade-offs. In reporting of statistical risks, format bias should be avoided through careful and consistent choice of format and by adding visual representations. Decision aids should be tested in real settings with iterative improvements. For appraisal of the implemented decision aids, consider using the Control Preference and Decisional Conflict scales. DISCUSSION: Further research is recommended regarding optimal engagement of users with decision aids and exploration of the distinct opportunities that computerized decision aids and online patient communities may present.
CONCLUSION: Decision aids can be a valuable tool for shared medical decision making. Their quality and usefulness can be maximized by involving users in their creation and by attending to key considerations in their design, implementation, and appraisal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31905336      PMCID: PMC6972553          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/19.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  17 in total

1.  Prime Time for Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Erica S Spatz; Harlan M Krumholz; Benjamin W Moulton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Design and testing of tools for shared decision making.

Authors:  Daniel D Matlock; Erica S Spatz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-04-08

3.  Belief in numbers: When and why women disbelieve tailored breast cancer risk statistics.

Authors:  Laura D Scherer; Peter A Ubel; Jennifer McClure; Sarah M Greene; Sharon Hensley Alford; Lisa Holtzman; Nicole Exe; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-04-24

4.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette O'Connor; Dawn Stacey; Robert Volk; Adrian Edwards; Angela Coulter; Richard Thomson; Alexandra Barratt; Michael Barry; Steven Bernstein; Phyllis Butow; Aileen Clarke; Vikki Entwistle; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Nora Moumjid; Al Mulley; Cornelia Ruland; Karen Sepucha; Alan Sykes; Tim Whelan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-08-14

Review 5.  Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.

Authors:  France Légaré; Dawn Stacey; Stéphane Turcotte; Marie-Joëlle Cossi; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Ian D Graham; Anne Lyddiatt; Mary C Politi; Richard Thomson; Glyn Elwyn; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-15

6.  User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Holly O Witteman; Selma Chipenda Dansokho; Heather Colquhoun; Angela Coulter; Michèle Dugas; Angela Fagerlin; Anik Mc Giguere; Sholom Glouberman; Lynne Haslett; Aubri Hoffman; Noah Ivers; France Légaré; Jean Légaré; Carrie Levin; Karli Lopez; Victor M Montori; Thierry Provencher; Jean-Sébastien Renaud; Kerri Sparling; Dawn Stacey; Gratianne Vaisson; Robert J Volk; William Witteman
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-26

Review 7.  Clarifying values: an updated review.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Michael Pignone; Purva Abhyankar; Nananda Col; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Teresa Gavaruzzi; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Carrie A Levin; Arwen H Pieterse; Valerie Reyna; Anne Stiggelbout; Laura D Scherer; Celia Wills; Holly O Witteman
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  "Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Isabelle Scholl; Caroline Tietbohl; Mala Mann; Adrian G K Edwards; Catharine Clay; France Légaré; Trudy van der Weijden; Carmen L Lewis; Richard M Wexler; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 9.  Balancing the presentation of information and options in patient decision aids: an updated review.

Authors:  Purva Abhyankar; Robert J Volk; Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby; Paulina Bravo; Angela Buchholz; Elissa Ozanne; Dale Colins Vidal; Nananda Col; Peep Stalmeier
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  A systematic development process for patient decision aids.

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Diana Stilwell; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Chirk Jenn Ng; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and Pilot Evaluation of a Decision Aid for Small Kidney Masses.

Authors:  Shailin A Thomas; Mutita Siriruchatanon; Stephanie L Albert; Marc Bjurlin; Jason C Hoffmann; Aisha Langford; R Scott Braithwaite; Danil V Makarov; Angela Fagerlin; Stella K Kang
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.