Literature DB >> 31904767

Association of Neighborhood-Level Disadvantage With Cerebral and Hippocampal Volume.

Jack F V Hunt1, William Buckingham2, Alice J Kim3, Jennifer Oh1, Nicholas M Vogt1, Erin M Jonaitis4, Tenah K Hunt5, Megan Zuelsdorff1, Ryan Powell2, Derek Norton1,6, Robert A Rissman7, Sanjay Asthana1,4,8,9, Ozioma C Okonkwo1,4,8,9, Sterling C Johnson1,4,8,9, Amy J H Kind1,2,8,9, Barbara B Bendlin1,4,8,9.   

Abstract

Importance: Identifying risk factors for brain atrophy during the aging process can help direct new preventive approaches for dementia and cognitive decline. The association of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage with brain volume in this context is not well known. Objective: To test whether neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with decreased brain volume in a cognitively unimpaired population enriched for Alzheimer disease risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study, conducted from January 6, 2010, to January 17, 2019, at an academic research neuroimaging center, used cross-sectional data on 951 participants from 2 large, ongoing cohort studies of Alzheimer disease (Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention and Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center clinical cohort). Participants were cognitively unimpaired based on National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroup diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease, confirmed through a consensus diagnosis panel. The cohort was enriched for Alzheimer disease risk based on family history of dementia. Statistical analysis was performed from April 3 to September 27, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The Area Deprivation Index, a geospatially determined index of neighborhood-level disadvantage, and cardiovascular disease risk indices were calculated for each participant. Linear regression models were fitted to test associations between relative neighborhood-level disadvantage (highest 20% based on state of residence) and hippocampal and total brain tissue volume, as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
Results: In the primary analysis of 951 participants (637 women [67.0%]; mean [SD] age, 63.9 [8.1] years), living in the 20% most disadvantaged neighborhoods was associated with 4.1% lower hippocampal volume (β = -317.44; 95% CI, -543.32 to -91.56; P = .006) and 2.0% lower total brain tissue volume (β = -20 959.67; 95% CI, -37 611.92 to -4307.43; P = .01), after controlling for intracranial volume, individual-level educational attainment, age, and sex. Robust propensity score-matched analyses determined that this association was not due to racial/ethnic or demographic characteristics. Cardiovascular risk score, examined in a subsample of 893 participants, mediated this association for total brain tissue but not for hippocampal volume. Conclusions and Relevance: For cognitively unimpaired individuals, living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods was associated with significantly lower cerebral volumes, after controlling for maximal premorbid (total intracranial) volume. This finding suggests an association of community socioeconomic context, distinct from individual-level socioeconomic status, with brain volume during aging. Cardiovascular risk mediated this association for total brain tissue volume but not for hippocampal volume, suggesting that neighborhood-level disadvantage may be associated with these 2 outcomes via distinct biological pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31904767      PMCID: PMC6990953          DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Neurol        ISSN: 2168-6149            Impact factor:   18.302


  51 in total

Review 1.  The National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework.

Authors:  Carl V Hill; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Norman A Anderson; Marie A Bernard
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  How Does the Accuracy of Intracranial Volume Measurements Affect Normalized Brain Volumes? Sample Size Estimates Based on 966 Subjects from the HUNT MRI Cohort.

Authors:  T I Hansen; V Brezova; L Eikenes; A Håberg; T R Vangberg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and 30-day rehospitalization: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amy J H Kind; Steve Jencks; Jane Brock; Menggang Yu; Christie Bartels; William Ehlenbach; Caprice Greenberg; Maureen Smith
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Stress Effects on Neuronal Structure: Hippocampus, Amygdala, and Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Bruce S McEwen; Carla Nasca; Jason D Gray
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Brain volume decline in aging: evidence for a relation between socioeconomic status, preclinical Alzheimer disease, and reserve.

Authors:  Anthony F Fotenos; Mark A Mintun; Abraham Z Snyder; John C Morris; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2008-01

6.  Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and body mass index among residentially stable mid-older aged adults: Findings from the HABITAT multilevel longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jerome N Rachele; Anne Kavanagh; Wendy J Brown; Aislinn M Healy; Christina J Schmid; Gavin Turrell
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Risk factors for progression of brain atrophy in aging: six-year follow-up of normal subjects.

Authors:  C Enzinger; F Fazekas; P M Matthews; S Ropele; H Schmidt; S Smith; R Schmidt
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 8.  The Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention: A review of findings and current directions.

Authors:  Sterling C Johnson; Rebecca L Koscik; Erin M Jonaitis; Lindsay R Clark; Kimberly D Mueller; Sara E Berman; Barbara B Bendlin; Corinne D Engelman; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Kirk J Hogan; Sanjay Asthana; Cynthia M Carlsson; Bruce P Hermann; Mark A Sager
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2017-12-08

9.  Early life socioeconomic circumstance and late life brain hyperintensities--a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Alison D Murray; Christopher J McNeil; Sima Salarirad; Lawrence J Whalley; Roger T Staff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Identifying preclinical vascular dementia in symptomatic small vessel disease using MRI.

Authors:  Christian Lambert; Eva Zeestraten; Owen Williams; Philip Benjamin; Andrew J Lawrence; Robin G Morris; Andrew D Mackinnon; Thomas R Barrick; Hugh S Markus
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Neurologic Complications of Poverty: the Associations Between Poverty as a Social Determinant of Health and Adverse Neurologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Monica Maalouf; Maureen Fearon; Mary Clare Lipa; Hannah Chow-Johnson; Linda Tayeh; Daniel Lipa
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Error in Second Footnote to Table 2.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 3.  Neurobehavioural comorbidities of epilepsy: towards a network-based precision taxonomy.

Authors:  Bruce P Hermann; Aaron F Struck; Robyn M Busch; Anny Reyes; Erik Kaestner; Carrie R McDonald
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 44.711

4.  The Association Between Neighborhood Poverty and Hippocampal Volume Among Individuals at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis: The Moderating Role of Social Engagement.

Authors:  Benson S Ku; Katrina Aberizk; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Ricardo E Carrión; Michael T Compton; Barbara A Cornblatt; Benjamin G Druss; Daniel H Mathalon; Diana O Perkins; Ming T Tsuang; Scott W Woods; Elaine F Walker
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 7.348

5.  The Relationship Between Prior Cancer Diagnosis and All-Cause Dementia Progression Among US Adults.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Fowler; Nicole C Wright; Kristen Triebel; Gabrielle B Rocque; Marguerite R Irvin; Richard E Kennedy
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.160

6.  Neighborhood-Level Social Disadvantage and Risk of Delirium Following Major Surgery.

Authors:  Franchesca Arias; Fan Chen; Tamara G Fong; Haley Shiff; Margarita Alegria; Edward R Marcantonio; Yun Gou; Richard N Jones; Thomas G Travison; Eva M Schmitt; Amy J H Kind; Sharon K Inouye
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Association of Neighborhood Context, Cognitive Decline, and Cortical Change in an Unimpaired Cohort.

Authors:  Jack F V Hunt; Nicholas M Vogt; Erin M Jonaitis; William R Buckingham; Rebecca L Koscik; Megan Zuelsdorff; Lindsay R Clark; Carey E Gleason; Menggang Yu; Ozioma Okonkwo; Sterling C Johnson; Sanjay Asthana; Barbara B Bendlin; Amy J H Kind
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 11.800

8.  Relationships Between Chronic Pain Stage, Cognition, Temporal Lobe Cortex, and Sociodemographic Variables.

Authors:  Jared J Tanner; Shivani Hanchate; Catherine C Price; Cynthia Garvan; Song Lai; Roland Staud; Hrishikesh Deshpande; Georg Deutsch; Burel R Goodin; Roger B Fillingim; Kimberly T Sibille
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 9.  Methods to Address Self-Selection and Reverse Causation in Studies of Neighborhood Environments and Brain Health.

Authors:  Lilah M Besser; Willa D Brenowitz; Oanh L Meyer; Serena Hoermann; John Renne
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Trends of hospitalizations among patients with both cancer and dementia diagnoses in New York 2007-2017.

Authors:  Bian Liu; Katherine A Ornstein; Naomi Alpert; Rebecca M Schwartz; Kavita V Dharmarajan; Amy S Kelley; Emanuela Taioli
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2021-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.