Literature DB >> 31903466

Opposite responses of normal hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma cells to substrate viscoelasticity.

Kalpana Mandal1, Ze Gong, Alexis Rylander, Vivek B Shenoy, Paul A Janmey.   

Abstract

The cellular microenvironment plays a critical role in cell differentiation, proliferation, migration, and homeostasis. Recent studies have shown the importance of substrate viscosity in determining cellular function. Here, we study the mechanoresponse of normal hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HCC) to elastic and viscoelastic substrates using the Huh7 cell line derived from a human liver tumor and primary human hepatocytes (PHH). Unlike PHH and fibroblasts, which respond to viscoelastic substrates by reducing spreading area and actin bundle assembly compared to purely elastic substrates of the same stiffness, Huh7 cells spread faster on viscoelastic substrates than on purely elastic substrates. The steady state spreading areas of Huh7 cells are larger on viscoelastic substrates, whereas the opposite effect occurs with PHH cells. The viscoelasticity of the microenvironment also promotes motility and multiple long protrusions in Huh7 cells. Pharmacologic disruption of the actin assembly makes cells unable to spread on either elastic or viscoelastic substrates. In contrast, upon vimentin perturbation, cells still spread to a limited degree on elastic substrates but are unable to spread on viscoelastic substrates. The time evolution of cell traction force shows that the peak occurs at an earlier time point on viscoelastic substrates compared to elastic substrates. However, the total force generation at steady state is the same on both substrates after 4 hours. Our data suggest that stress relaxation time scales of the viscoelastic substrate regulate cell dynamics and traction force generation, indicating different binding-unbinding rates of the proteins that form cell attachment sites in HCC cells and normal hepatocytes. These results suggest that liver cancer cells may have different characteristic lifetimes of binding to the substrate in comparision to normal cells, which might cause differences in cell spreading and motility within the diseased tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31903466     DOI: 10.1039/c9bm01339c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomater Sci        ISSN: 2047-4830            Impact factor:   6.843


  14 in total

1.  A Novel Method to Make Polyacrylamide Gels with Mechanical Properties Resembling those of Biological Tissues.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pogoda; Elisabeth E Charrier; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2021-08-20

Review 2.  Collective Cell Migration on Collagen-I Networks: The Impact of Matrix Viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Ivana Pajic-Lijakovic; Milan Milivojevic; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-04

Review 3.  Reciprocity of Cell Mechanics with Extracellular Stimuli: Emerging Opportunities for Translational Medicine.

Authors:  Yiwei Li; Ian Y Wong; Ming Guo
Journal:  Small       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 15.153

4.  Recursive feedback between matrix dissipation and chemo-mechanical signaling drives oscillatory growth of cancer cell invadopodia.

Authors:  Ze Gong; Katrina M Wisdom; Eóin McEvoy; Julie Chang; Kolade Adebowale; Christopher C Price; Ovijit Chaudhuri; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  A novel method to make viscoelastic polyacrylamide gels for cell culture and traction force microscopy.

Authors:  Elisabeth E Charrier; Katarzyna Pogoda; Robin Li; Chan Young Park; Jeffrey J Fredberg; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2020-07-02

6.  Vimentin Intermediate Filaments Mediate Cell Morphology on Viscoelastic Substrates.

Authors:  Maxx Swoger; Sarthak Gupta; Elisabeth E Charrier; Michael Bates; Heidi Hehnly; Alison E Patteson
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2022-01-07

Review 7.  Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour.

Authors:  Ovijit Chaudhuri; Justin Cooper-White; Paul A Janmey; David J Mooney; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Reconstructing the tumor architecture into organoids.

Authors:  Zhimin Luo; Xingwu Zhou; Kalpana Mandal; Na He; Wally Wennerberg; Moyuan Qu; Xing Jiang; Wujin Sun; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 17.873

9.  Bioinformatics Analysis of Prognostic Tumor Microenvironment-Related Genes in the Tumor Microenvironment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Zongbiao Tian; Zheng Wang; Yanfeng Chen; Shuoying Qu; Changhong Liu; Fengzhe Chen; Lixian Ma; Jie Zhu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-03-31

Review 10.  Review of PIP2 in Cellular Signaling, Functions and Diseases.

Authors:  Kalpana Mandal
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.