| Literature DB >> 31903345 |
Janissardhar Skulsampaopol1, Ake Hansasuta1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness and safety of a cotton swab for extracapsular dissection in endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS) for pituitary adenoma (PA).Entities:
Keywords: Cotton swab; endoscopic; extracapsular dissection; pituitary adenoma; transsphenoidal surgery
Year: 2019 PMID: 31903345 PMCID: PMC6896643 DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_169_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Neurosurg
Figure 1Endoscopic image shows utilizing a cotton swab for extracapsular dissection. The plane between overlying arachnoid and the pseudocapsule (capsule) of the tumor (solid curve line) was established along with the plane separating tumor and the normal pituitary gland (dotted line)
Factors for intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage
| Variable | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| Increasing age | 0.96 (0.92-0.99) | 0.028 | 0.96 (0.91-1.001) | 0.058* |
| Modified Hardy Stage A | 0.12 (0.02-0.70) | 0.018 | 0.06 (0.01-0.56) | 0.013* |
*Logistic regression analysis. CI – Confidence interval; OR – Odds ratio
Factors for postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage and meningitis
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 intraoperative leakage | 0.09 (0.01-0.90) | 0.040* |
*Logistic regression analysis. CI – Confidence interval; OR – Odds ratio
Factors associated with total tumor removal
| Variable | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| Knosp 4 | 0.21 (0.08-0.52) | 0.001 | 0.20 (0.07-0.65) | 0.007* |
| Preoperative tumor volume | 0.92 (0.86-0.99) | 0.022 | 0.98 (0.91-1.06) | 0.636* |
| Previous surgery versus no surgery | 0.13 (0.04-0.37) | < 0.001 | 0.12 (0.04-0.38) | <0.001* |
| Nonfunctioning versus functioning PA | 0.27 (0.09-0.79) | 0.017 | 0.65 (0.18-2.29) | 0.500* |
*Logistic regression analysis. CI – Confidence interval; PA – Pituitary adenoma; OR – Odds ratio
Patient demographics, clinical presentation and preoperative radiographic features (n=100)
| Age, year (SD) | 50.41 (13.96) |
| Sex | |
| Male:female (%) | 50:50 |
| Presenting symptoms (%) | |
| Visual disturbance | 50 |
| Ophthalmoplegia | 6 |
| Apoplexy | 8 |
| Recurrent tumor with growth | 19 |
| Residual tumor without growth | 14 |
| Asymptomatic | 19 |
| Prior treatment (%) | |
| Surgery | 34 |
| Radiotherapy | 3 |
| Nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma (%) | 81 |
| Functioning pituitary adenoma (%) | 19 |
| GH-producing | 8 |
| ACTH-producing | 5 |
| Prolactinoma | 4 |
| Mixed hormone-producing | 2 |
| Hormone status, normal: deficit (%) | 34:66 |
| Sphenoid pneumatization, sellar:presellar type (%) | 73:27 |
| Macroadenoma: Microadenoma (%) | 97:3 |
| Median tumor volume, milliliter (IQR) | 5.35 (2.7, 10.15) |
| Normal pituitary gland position (%) (right: midline:left) | 44:13:43 |
| Modified Hardy’s classification (%) | |
| Stage 0 | 1 |
| Stage A | 6 |
| Stage B | 20 |
| Stage C | 73 |
| Modified Knosp grading (%) | |
| | 15 |
| Grade 0 | 0 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 14 |
| | 85 |
| Grade 3A | 30 |
| Grade 3B | 17 |
| Grade 4 | 38 |
ACTH – Adrenocorticotropic hormone; GH – Growth hormone; IQR – Interquartile range, SD – Standard deviation
Intraoperative data and complications (n=100)
| Intraoperative residual tumor (%) | 62 |
| Definite | 56 |
| Suspected | 6 |
| Intraoperative CSF leakage (%) | |
| No leakage | 22 |
| Evidence of leakage | 78 |
| Grade 1 | 54 |
| Grade 2 | 14 |
| Grade 3 | 10 |
| Internal carotid artery injury (%) | 0 |
| Postoperative complications (%) | |
| Pituitary apoplexy | 0 |
| Persistent CSF leakage requiring surgical repair | 3 |
| Meningitis | 3 |
| Death | 0 |
CSF – Cerebrospinal fluid